双边网络环境下考虑消费者行为的两期供应链回收定价模型研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0098

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 97-107.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0098

双边网络环境下考虑消费者行为的两期供应链回收定价模型研究

朱晓东¹, 李薇²

1. 南京信息工程大学管理工程学院, 江苏南京 210044;
2. 南京信息工程大学长望学院, 江苏南京 210044

收稿日期:2020-01-08 修回日期:2020-02-25 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-26
通讯作者: 朱晓东(1979-),男(汉族),山东淄博人,南京信息工程大学管理工程学院,副教授,博士,研究方向:供应链建模与优化,E-mail:zxd@nuist.edu.cn. E-mail:zxd@nuist.edu.cn.
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目（19YJC630240）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（71804072）；国家级大学生创新创业训练计划项目（201910300045Z）

Research on A Two-period Supply Chain Recycling Pricing Model Considering Consumer Behavior in A Two-sided Network Environment

ZHU Xiao-dong¹, LI Wei²

1. School of Management Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
2. ChangWang School of Honors, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

Received:2020-01-08 Revised:2020-02-25 Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 闭环供应链管理是促进经济与环境双重效益提高的有效途径，已成为电子废弃物回收利用的核心解决方案。本文考虑包括制造商和第三方回收平台组成的闭环供应链模型，构建了完全垄断的两期动态博弈双边平台，分析和比较了分散决策和集中决策下闭环供应链的最优回收定价和利润，并利用收益共享契约来实现闭环供应链帕累托改进，最后用数值仿真分析了再制造比例、用户对平台利润贡献率对供应链利润的影响，验证了契约协调的有效性。研究表明：交叉网络外部性强度与平台向两边征收的价格、各主体利润和总体利润存在相关关系。第三方回收平台通过补贴消费者可有效增加回收效用，提高了回收率与消费者回收意识。实施收益共享契约的互利性使各主体积极主动实施契约，提高了各方与总体利润。

关键词: 闭环供应链, 双边市场, 网络外部性, 消费者行为, Stackelberg博弈

Abstract: Closed-loop supply chain management has been an effective way to improve the economic and environmental benefits and has become a core solution of product recycling system. A closed-loop supply chain model including manufacturers, consumers and the third-party recycling platform is considered, building a complete monopoly two-sided platform in a two-period dynamic game. Based on the model, the optimal recycling prices and profits of the decentralized and centralized decision model are analyzed and compared respectively. Pareto improvement is also lived through revenue sharing contract. Finally, a numerical simulationisused to analyze the impact of remanufacturing proportion and profit contribution rate of users on the profits, which verifies the effectiveness of the contract. Overall, the results show that decentralized decision will lead to loss of profits of closed-loop supply chain, while the profit of the whole closed-loop supply chain is optimal under the centralized decision. By subsidizing consumers,the third-party recycling platform effectively increases the recycling efficiency. The recycling rate and consumers' awareness of recycling are also raised by this way.Additionally, each participant is motivated to implement the revenue sharing contract due to its mutual benefits, which increases the profit of each party. Consequently, the overall profit of the closed-loop supply chain increases as well.

Key words: closed-loop supply chain, two-sided markets, network externality, consumer behavior, stackelberg game

中图分类号:

F252

朱晓东, 李薇. 双边网络环境下考虑消费者行为的两期供应链回收定价模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(5): 97-107.

ZHU Xiao-dong, LI Wei. Research on A Two-period Supply Chain Recycling Pricing Model Considering Consumer Behavior in A Two-sided Network Environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(5): 97-107.

参考文献

[1] Kabul M O, Parlaktürk A K. The value of commitments when selling to strategic consumers:A supply chain perspective[J]. Management Science, 2019, 65(10):4754-4770.
[2] 王喜刚. 逆向供应链中电子废弃产品回收定价和补贴策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8):107-115.
[3] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S,Van Wassen-hove L N.Closed-loop supplychain models with productremanufacturing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2):239-252.
[4] Zhao Junjie, Wang Chuanxu, Xu Lang. Decision forpricing, service and recyclingof closed-loop supplychains considering different remanufacturing roles andtechnology authorizations\. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019:132.
[5] 李琰, 林欣怡, 达庆利. 基于旧件质量和"以旧换再"补贴的分级定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1):131-142.
[6] 朱晓东, 吴冰冰, 王哲. 双渠道回收成本差异下的闭环供应链定价策略与协调机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(12):188-196.
[7] Li Yongjian, Feng Lipan, Govindan K, et al. Effects of a secondary market on original equipment manufactures' pricing, trade-in remanufacturing, and entry decisions[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 279(3):751-766.
[8] Zhu Xiaodong, Wang Jing, Tang Juan. Recycling pricing and coordination of WEEE Dual-channel closed-loop supply chain considering consumers' bargaining[J]. Internationaljournal of environmental research andpublic health,2017, 14(12):1578.
[9] 王玉燕, 于兆青. 基于电商平台销售的E-供应链主导模型与佣金协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(5):109-118.
[10] 冯章伟, 肖条军, 柴彩春. 第三方回收商领导型两级闭环供应链的回收与定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018,26(1):118-127.
[11] Alamdar S F, Rabbani M, Heydari, J. Pricing, collection, and effort decisions with coordination contracts in a fuzzy, three-level closed-loop supply chain[J]. Expert Systems with Application, 2018, 104(Aug.):261-276.
[12] 王文宾, 周维明, 张梦,等. 考虑政府引导制造商节能的闭环供应链决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2018, 26(7):108-118.
[13] 邢大宁, 赵启兰, 郜红虎. 基于双边市场理论的物流信息平台定价策略研究[J]. 商业经济与管理, 2018,6:5-15.
[14] Armstrong M. Competitionintwo-sided markets[J].The RANDJournalof Economics, 2006, 37(3):668-691.
[15] Rochet J C, TiroleJ. Platformcompetitionintwo-sided markets[J]. Journalof European Economic Association, 2003, 1(4):990-1029.
[16] Caillaud B, Jullien B. Chicken & egg:Competition amongintermediationserviceproviders[J]. RANDjournal of Economics, 2003,34(2):309-328.
[17] Wang X V, Wang Lihui. Digitaltwin-based WEEErecycling,recovery and remanufacturing in the backgroundofIndustry 4.0[J]. InternationalJournal of ProductionResearch, 2019, 57(12):3892-3902.
[18] Awasthi A K, Li Jinhui. Management ofelectrical and electronic waste Acomparative evaluation of China andIndia. Renewableand Sustainable Energy Reviews,2017,76:434-447.
[19] Islam M T, Huda N. Assessingtherecycling potentialof "unregulated" e-wastein Australia[J]. Resources,Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 152:104526.
[20] Atasu A, Sarvary M, Van Wassenhove L N. Remanufacturing as a marketingstrategy[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(10):1731-1746.
[21] Chen C M, Ho H. Who pays you to be green? Howcustomers' environmental practices affect the salesbenefits of suppliers' environmental practices. Journal of Operations Management, 2019, 65(4):333-352.

双边网络环境下考虑消费者行为的两期供应链回收定价模型研究

Research on A Two-period Supply Chain Recycling Pricing Model Considering Consumer Behavior in A Two-sided Network Environment

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	张巧可, 陈洪转. 基于质量意识的复杂产品质量控制激励策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 105-114.
[2]	林贵华, 冯文秀, 杨振平. 回收商参与的多阶段绿色闭环供应链竞争模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 136-148.
[3]	王文宾, 王智慧, 杨斯奇, 安霓, 吕佳. 制造商竞争下闭环供应链的押金返还制度研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 179-188.
[4]	桂云苗, 武众, 龚本刚. 竞争环境下双边平台增值服务质量投资竞争研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(5): 65-76.
[5]	李建苗, 李向荣, 张克勇, 郭敏. 新零售模式下在线零售商融资均衡与协调策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 57-69.
[6]	王玉燕, 梁佳平, 申亮, 韩强. 电商平台公平关切下低碳E-CLSC的决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 115-125.
[7]	邱甲贤, 雍驰, 童牧. 独立定价还是共同定价:新支付工具的定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 19-31.
[8]	高鹏, 杜建国, 聂佳佳, 朱宾欣. 消费者品牌忠诚对品牌商再制造市场策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 47-58.
[9]	潘永明, 邹丁华, 张志武. 基于碳标签制度的两级供应链协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 109-115.
[10]	蒲勇健, 余沙, 黄毅祥. 中国电力市场长期产业组织架构与电价趋势研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 158-167.
[11]	林志炳. 基于网络外部性的绿色制造策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 137-145.
[12]	曹兵兵, 樊治平, 尤天慧, 刘春怡. 基于提前支付且考虑银行存贷的资金约束供应链最优定价决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 52-64.
[13]	熊勇清, 李小龙, 黄恬恬. 基于不同补贴主体的新能源汽车制造商定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 139-147.
[14]	王珊珊, 张李浩, 范体军. 基于碳减排技术的竞争供应链投资均衡策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 73-82.
[15]	孙红霞, 李晓芳, 周珍. 双渠道零售商和传统零售商的定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 104-111.