主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (8): 32-40.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2120

• • 上一篇    下一篇

按收购量补贴还是按收购价补贴?

浦徐进(),赖德凌,金德龙   

  1. 江南大学商学院,江苏 无锡 214122
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-13 修回日期:2020-12-21 出版日期:2023-08-15 发布日期:2023-08-24
  • 通讯作者: 浦徐进 E-mail:puyiwei@ustc.edu
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助面上项目(72271109)

Subsidy Based on Purchase Volume or Purchase Price?

Xu-jin PU(),De-ling LAI,De-long JIN   

  1. School of Business,Jiangnan University,Wuxi 214122,China
  • Received:2020-11-13 Revised:2020-12-21 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-08-24
  • Contact: Xu-jin PU E-mail:puyiwei@ustc.edu

摘要:

考虑到当前政府鼓励电商扶贫采用的两种典型补贴政策——按收购量补贴和按收购价补贴,本文构建了由政府、电商和农户组成的农产品供应链模型,建立了三方之间的博弈模型,分析不同补贴政策影响三方行为决策的机制,最终提出了政府选择合理补贴政策的依据。研究发现:(1)电商和政府对于不同补贴政策的偏好具有差异性。(2)电商始终偏好于政府按收购量提供补贴。当补贴预算相对有限时,政府偏好选择按收购价补贴的政策;而当补贴预算相对宽裕时,政府可以选择任意一种补贴政策。(3)随着农户产出风险厌恶程度增大,政府会更加倾向于选择按收购价补贴的政策。研究结论能够为政府合理选择鼓励电商扶贫的补贴政策提供决策参考。

关键词: 农产品供应链, 电商扶贫, 补贴政策, 预算约束, 风险厌恶

Abstract:

There are two typical subsidy policies adopted currently by government to encourage poverty alleviation through e-commerce——subsidy based on purchase volume and subsidy based on purchase price. An agricultural supply chain model composed of government, e-commerce and farmer is developed, a game model between three parties is established, with a risk-averse farmer and government subject to subsidy budget constraint. The mechanism where different subsidy policy affects three parties’ decision-making behaviors is analyzed, and finally the basis for the government under different subsidy budget constraint to choose a reasonable subsidy policy is put forward. It is found that (1) the e-commerce and the government have different preference for different subsidy policy; (2) the e-commerce always prefers the government to provide subsidy based on purchase volume. When the subsidy budget is relatively limited, the government prefers to choose the policy of subsidizing based on purchase price; when the subsidy budget is relatively sufficient, the government can choose either of the subsidy policies; (3) as farmer’s aversion to yield risk increases, the government will become more inclined to choose policy of subsidy based on purchase price. This shows that the government should pay attention to the difference in the degree of risk aversion of farmers when making subsidy policy. For example, young professional farmers are lower risk-averse, while old farmers whose scale are small are higher risk-averse. The study not only complement the literature on government subsidy for poverty alleviation through e-commerce but also provide decision-making reference for the government under different subsidy budget constraint to rationally choose subsidy policy to encourage poverty alleviation through e-commerce.

Key words: agricultural supply chain, poverty alleviation through e-commerce, subsidy policy, budget constraint, risk-averse

中图分类号: