主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 221-230.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.05.021

• 论文 • 上一篇    

能源补贴改革对资源效率和环境污染治理影响研究——基于动态CGE模型的分析

徐晓亮1,2, 许学芬3   

  1. 1. 南京理工大学经济管理学院, 江苏 南京 210096;
    2. 江苏产业集群决策咨询研究基地, 江苏 南京 210096;
    3. 南京中医药大学医学院, 江苏 南京 210023
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-06 修回日期:2018-12-18 出版日期:2020-05-30 发布日期:2020-05-30
  • 通讯作者: 徐晓亮(1982-),男(汉族),安徽蚌埠人,南京理工大学经济管理学院,教授,博士,研究方向:资源环境经济学,E-mail:xuxiaol2004@126.com. E-mail:xuxiaol2004@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71203002);南京市软科学基金资助项目(20191002);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(30920010020);江苏省社科优青科研资助;南京理工大学青年拔尖人才计划支持

The Impacts of China's Energy Subsidies on Resource Efficiency and Environmental Pollution Control

XU Xiao-liang1,2, XU Xue-fen3   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210096, China;
    2. Jiangsu Industrial Cluster Decision Consulting Research Base, Nanjing 210096, China;
    3. School of Pharmacy, Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2018-07-06 Revised:2018-12-18 Online:2020-05-30 Published:2020-05-30

摘要: 本文构建动态CGE模型,以化石和可再生能源补贴政策为对象,模拟不同类型能源补贴政策改革对经济发展、资源效率、碳排放及雾霾治理的差异性影响。研究表明:总体而言,能源补贴政策对宏观经济具有积极的促进作用,但在一定程度上会提高能源消费强度;不同类型的能源补贴政策方案影响的差异性较大,化石能源在促进经济增长的同时,对环境改善和碳排放目标实现产生不利影响,特别是煤炭补贴能有效降低能源使用成本,极大促进产业总产出和经济增长,但会不利于环境改善,对可再生能源补贴有利于能源利用效率提高和人均资源盈余改善,降低污染物和雾霾排放增速;因此,必须注重不同类型能源补贴政策协调性和差异性,短期内以化石能源补贴为主,长期而言,应逐步加大可再生能源补贴,更加有利于低碳转型和环境改善。

关键词: 能源补贴政策, 动态CGE模型, 经济增长, 环境改善

Abstract: Efficient energy subsidy policy is considered to be one of an effective means to improve industrial competitiveness, but will also induce excessive energy consumption and environmental pollution problems. The paper constructs a dynamic computable general equilibrium model(dynamic CGE model)to simulate the impact on Chinese economy, carbon emissions reduction, and smog emissions from a long-term span by energy subsidies. The research shows that: energy subsidy has a positive role in promoting macroeconomic for China, but will stimulate the energy consumption intensity to a certain extent; and the different types of energy subsidies program have differences affect on promoting economic growth. At the same time, energy subsidy will have an adverse impact on environmental improvement and carbon emission targets. In particular, coal subsidies can reduce energy use costs and greatly promote total industrial output and economic growth, but it will not help the environment, and subsidies for renewable energy will benefit. To improve the environment and carbon emissions, coal subsidy policy can directly reduce energy prices, the cost of the total industry output and the greatest impact on economic growth. Energy subsidy policy will have major environmental pollutants and carbon emissions greater negative impact, and renewable energy subsidies are in favor of energy efficiency and improve earnings per capita resources; hence, under the comprehensive view of economic growth and reduction of energy subsidies, the government must focus policy program coordination and integrity to adjust the energy policy of the socio-economic and environmental systems. In the short term, we should focus on fossil energy subsidies. In the long run, Gradually increasing subsidies for renewable energy is more conducive to low-carbon transformation and environmental improvement.

Key words: energy subsidies, dynamic CGE model, economic growth, environmental improvement

中图分类号: