碳限额交易与补贴政策下动力电池闭环供应链决策分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1828

Abstract

Abstract:

To promote the power battery recycling work and promote the carbon emission reduction of enterprises， the government launched carbon cap-and-trade mechanism and subsidy policy， to explore the impact of the government subsidy strategy choice on the decision-making of the power battery recycling supply chain under cap-and-trade mechanism， a closed-loop supply chain led by power battery manufacturer and composed of the vehicle manufacturer and third-party recycler is constructed， and the optimal decision-making of the power battery recycling supply chain under the three strategies of subsidized power battery manufacturer is studied. In addition， three recycling models are constructed： single-channel monopoly recycling， mixed recycling and alliance recycling， and the supply chain decision-making， profit and recycling rate under different recycling models are compared. Results show that （1） The forward supply chain decision of power battery recycling is affected by the carbon cap-and-trade mechanism and recycling models， while the subsidy policy only affects the reverse supply chain decision；（2） The carbon cap-and-trade mechanism improves the profits of the power battery recycling supply chain， showing that the increase of carbon quota and carbon price is conducive to the increase of the profit of the power battery recycling supply chain， while the increase of carbon price leads to poor recovery performance；（3） Subsidy policies improve supply chain profits and recycling rates， and the recycling rate of subsidized power battery manufacturers or recyclers is always better than that of subsidized consumers；（4） The impact of carbon cap-and-trade mechanism and subsidy policy on the supply chain is not affected by the recycling mode， but the supply chain profit and recovery rate of the alliance recycling mode are better than that of single-channel recycling and mixed recycling.

Key words: power battery recycling, closed-loop supply chain, recycling model, cap-and-trade mechanism, government subsidy

CLC Number:

X773

Wenqi Wu, Ming Zhang. Decision-making Analysis of Power Battery Recycling under Carbon Cap-and-trade Mechanism and Subsidy Policy[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(8): 340-354.

Figures/Tables 11

符号	定义	单位	符号	定义	单位
$c m$	使用原材料生产单位动力电池的成本	元/组	$e$	单位动力电池生产的初始碳排放	吨
$c r$	使用回收材料再生产单位动力电池的成本	元/组	$ρ$	市场需求对碳减排率的弹性系数
$η$	单位动力电池梯次利用的净利润	元/组	$s$	每吨碳排放的价格	元/吨
$Δ$	单位退役动力电池再利用的净收益	元/组	$h$	碳减排成本系数
$θ$	消费者对动力电池零售价格的敏感系数		$D (p)$	市场上的动力电池的需求	组
$a$	消费者自愿返还的退役动力电池数量	组	$Π j i$	回收模式 $i$ 中成员 $j$ 的利润函数	元
$E$	政府分配给动力电池制造商的碳排放额	吨	$b$	消费者对回收价格的敏感系数	组
$E R$	单位退役动力电池循环利用节省的碳排放量	吨	$δ x$	渠道竞争系数
$P i$	第 $i$ 种回收模式下的供应链的总利润	元	$ϕ$	市场潜在需求量	组
$k$	回收单位退役动力电池的努力成本	元/组	$Q i$	动力电池回收总量	组
$A$	回收单位退役动力电池的固定成本	元/组	$E i$	第 $i$ 种回收模式下的回收率	%
$g$	政府补贴	元/组	$V$	单位退役动力电池剩余容量
$p$	零售价格	元/组	$w$	批发价格	元/组
$r j i$	回收模式 $i$ 中成员 $j$ 的回收价格	元/组	$t$	转移支付价格	元/组
$l$	单位动力电池的碳减排水平	%

参数	取值	参数	取值
$ϕ$	300000	$A T$	350
$θ$	1.6	$k$	1.1
$c m$	14349	$E R$	0.017
$b$	1.1	$E$	13650
$δ m v$	0.5	$ρ$	15
$V$	47	$g$	20
$δ v$	0.49	$δ m t$	0.48
$δ t$	0.47	$δ m$	0.46
$A M$	400	$e$	0.5
$A V$	300	$Δ$	29349
$s$	56.75	$h$	10

References 34

[1]	Fang L， Li Y， Govindan K. Entry mode selection for a new entrant of the electric vehicle automaker［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2024， 313（1）： 270-280.
[2]	Liu F， Li J， Zhang J Z， et al. Optimal strategy for secondary use of spent electric vehicle batteries： Sell， lease， or both［J/OL］. Annals of Operations Research， 2023. .
[3]	Feng Z， Luo N， Shalpegin T， et al. The influence of carbon emission reduction instruments on blockchain technology adoption in recycling batteries of the new energy vehicles［J］.International Journal of Production Research， 2024， 62（3）： 891-908.
[4]	El Ouardighi F， Sim J， Kim B. Pollution accumulation and abatement policies in two supply chains under vertical and horizontal competition and strategy types［J］. Omega， 2021， 98： 102108.
[5]	Wu W， Zhang M， Jin D， et al. Decision-making analysis of electric vehicle battery recycling under different recycling models and deposit-refund scheme［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2024， 191： 110109.
[6]	Yu J J， Tang C S， Shen Z M. Improving consumer welfare and manufacturer profit via government subsidy programs： Subsidizing consumers or manufacturers？［J］. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management， 2018， 20（4）： 752-766.
[7]	Chen J， Zhang W， Gong B， et al. Optimal policy for the recycling of electric vehicle retired power batteries［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change， 2022， 183： 121930.
[8]	Hsieh I L， Pan M S， Green W H. Transition to electric vehicles in China： Implications for private motorization rate and battery market［J］. Energy Policy， 2020， 144： 111654.
[9]	姚锋敏，闫颍洛，滕春贤. 考虑政府补贴及CSR投入的闭环供应链运作协调［J］. 系统工程学报， 2021， 36（6）： 817-832.
	Yao F M， Yan Y L， Teng C X. Operation coordination of closed-loop supply chain considering government subsidies and CSR input［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering， 2021， 36（6）： 817-832.
[10]	Liu K， Wang C. The impacts of subsidy policies and channel encroachment on the power battery recycling of new energy vehicles Open Access［J］. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies，2021，16（3）： 770-789.
[11]	Bao B， Ma J， Goh M. Short- and long-term repeated game behaviours of two parallel supply chains based on government subsidy in the vehicle market［J］. International Journal of Production Research， 2020， 58（24）： 7507-7530.
[12]	侯艳辉，王晓晓，郝敏，等. 政府补贴和平台宣传投入下双渠道逆向供应链定价策略研究［J］. 运筹与管理， 2019， 28（5）： 84-91.
	Hou Y H， Wang X X， Hao M， et al. Research on the pricing strategies of reverse supply chain with dual channels under government subsidy and platform publicity investment［J］. Operations Research and Management Science， 2019， 28（5）： 84-91.
[13]	黄宗盛，张媛. 资金支持还是劳动联合？第三方回收动态闭环供应链合作模式选择［J］. 中国管理科学， 2023， DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2575 .
	Huang Z S， Zhang Y. Funding or laboring？cooperative collection strategy selection in dynamic closed-loop supply chain［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2023，DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2575 .
[14]	Sun H， Liu Y. Production decisions in remanufacturing under the cap-and-trade considering consumer education and government subsidies［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2023， 182： 109358.
[15]	Mitra S， Webster S. Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2008， 111（2）： 287-298.
[16]	Heydari J， Govindan K， Jafari A. Reverse and closed loop supply chain coordination by considering government role［J］. Transportation Research Part D： Transport and Environment， 2017， 52： 379-398.
[17]	石纯来，舒夕珂，胡培. 奖惩机制对混合回收闭环供应链中制造商合作的影响［J］. 管理工程学报， 2020， 34（5）： 178-189.
	Shi C L， Shu X K， Hu P. Alliance with the retailer or the recycler in the hybrid-recycling closed-loop supply chain under premium and penalty mechanism？［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management， 2020， 34（5）： 178-189.
[18]	侯玉梅，孙金香，任静. 政府规制下电器电子产品闭环供应链回收模式决策研究［J］. 生态经济， 2019， 35（2）： 86-94.
	Hou Y M， Sun J X， Ren J. Research on the decisions of the recycling models of closed-loop supply chain for electrical and electronic equipment under the government regulations［J］. Ecological Economy， 2019， 35（2）： 86-94.
[19]	Chai Q， Xiao Z， Lai K H， et al. Can carbon cap and trade mechanism be beneficial for remanufacturing？［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2018， 203： 311-321.
[20]	Chai Q， Sun M， Lai K H， et al. The effects of government subsidies and environmental regulation on remanufacturing［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2023， 178： 109126.
[21]	Wang X， Sethi S P， Chang S. Pollution abatement using cap-and-trade in a dynamic supply chain and its coordination［J］. Transportation Research Part E： Logistics and Transportation Review，2022，158： 102592.
[22]	Yang L， Gao M， Feng L. Competition versus cooperation？ Which is better in a remanufacturing supply chain considering blockchain［J］. Transportation Research Part E： Logistics and Transportation Review， 2022， 165： 102855.
[23]	Cai J， Jiang F. Decision models of pricing and carbon emission reduction for low-carbon supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2023， 264： 108964.
[24]	Mao H， Wang W， Liu C， et al. Effects of the carbon emission quota policy on the quality and sales of manufactured and remanufactured products［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2023， 266： 109058.
[25]	张川，田雨鑫，崔梦雨. 电动汽车动力电池制造商混合渠道回收模式选择与碳减排决策［J］. 中国管理科学， 2024， 32（6）： 184-195.
	Zhang C， Tian Y X， Cui M Y. Selection of hybrid channel recycling modes and carbon emission reduction decisions for the electric vehicle battery manufacturer［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2024， 32（6）： 184-195.
[26]	陈静，赵灿红，高歌，等. 碳限额及交易背景下双渠道供应链纵向合作动态减排研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2025， 33（2）： 300-307.
	Chen J， Zhao C H， Gao G， et al. Research on dynamic emission reduction of vertical cooperation in dual-channel supply chain under carbon cap and trade policy［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2025， 33（2）： 300-307.
[27]	Wu W， Cong N， Zhang X， et al. Life cycle assessment and carbon reduction potential prediction of electric vehicles batteries［J］. Science of The Total Environment， 2023， 903： 166620.
[28]	Guo Y， Wang M， Yang F. Joint emission reduction strategy considering channel inconvenience under different recycling structures［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2022， 169： 108159.
[29]	Anand K S， Giraud-Carrier F C. Pollution regulation of competitive markets［J］. Management Science， 2020， 66（9）： 4193-4206.
[30]	Savaskan R C， Bhattacharya S， Van Wassenhove L N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing［J］. Management Science， 2004， 50（2）： 239-252.
[31]	Zhang C， Chen Y X， Tian Y X. Collection and recycling decisions for electric vehicle end-of-life power batteries in the context of carbon emissions reduction［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2023， 175： 108869.
[32]	谢家平，李璟，杨非凡，等. 新能源汽车闭环供应链的多级契约决策优化［J］. 管理工程学报， 2020， 34（2）： 180-193.
	Xie J P， Li J， Yang F F， et al. Decision-making and coordination optimized for multi-stage closed-loop supply chain of new energy vehicle［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management， 2020， 34（2）： 180-193.
[33]	Zhang M， Wu W， Song Y. Study on the impact of government policies on power battery recycling under different recycling models［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2023， 413： 137492.
[34]	郑本荣，杨超，杨珺. 回收渠道竞争下制造商的战略联盟策略选择［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2018， 38（6）： 1479-1491.
	Zheng B R， Yang C， Yang J. Manufacturer’s optimal alliance strategy in closed loop supply chains in the presence of competing recycling channels［J］.Systems Engineering -Theory & Practice，2018，38（6）：1479-1491.

模式	补贴动力电池制造商		补贴整车制造商		补贴消费者
模式	供应链利润	回收率	供应链利润	回收率	供应链利润	回收率
模式M	15554781511	0.23011	15554781511	0.23012	15554452831	0.22997
模式V	15494594597	0.11544	15494594597	0.11544	15494347262	0.11537
模式T	15493976570	0.11525	15493976570	0.11525	15493729648	0.11518
模式MV	15704276051	0.32366	15709195843	0.32366	15703746846	0.29769
模式MVT	15828691044	0.40378	15835691943	0.40378	15827995067	0.19449
模式M+V	20813008963	0.16204	20698933069	0.11468	20812479022	0.16193
模式M+T	15705177661	0.32402	15710084816	0.32402	15704647856	0.29805
模式V+T	15704276051	0.32366	15709195843	0.32366	15703746846	0.29769
模式C	20662405065	0.11501	20595399316	0.08365	20662076385	0.11494

Decision-making Analysis of Power Battery Recycling under Carbon Cap-and-trade Mechanism and Subsidy Policy

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 11

References 34

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Yeming Dai, Shuang Yu. Remanufacturing Closed-loop Supply Chain Decision Considering Retailer’s Dual Behavior Preference under Carbon Tax Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(8): 308-320.
[2]	Mei Duan, Zhenwei Liu, Lang Liu. Differential Game of Dynamic Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Consumers' Purchasing Regret [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(8): 321-330.
[3]	Zongsheng Huang, Yuan Zhang, Lingkang Zeng. Funding or Laboring? Cooperative Collection Strategy Selection in Dynamic Closed-loop Supply Chain [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(7): 262-271.
[4]	He Huang, Wenping Li, Hongyan Xu. Information Sharing with Social Responsibility, Government Subsidy and Cost Sharing [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(6): 265-276.
[5]	Wei Li, Yun Jiang, Yuqin Gan, Baoguang Xu. Research on OEM Provenance Selection and Remanufacturing Authorization Decision in Cross-border Closed-loop Supply Chain Based on Tax Difference [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(5): 302-312.
[6]	Xiqiang Xia, Peihan Li, Jiahui Jia, Rui Wu, Mengyuan Lu. Studying on the Impact of Government Subsidies on Manufacturing/Remanufacturing Based on Different Allocation Modes of Carbon Allowance [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(5): 313-324.
[7]	Weizhen Rao, Lichen Zhou, Xiangyu Ma, Qinghua Zhu. Dual Low-carbon Incentive Strategy for Collaborative Distribution Based on a Digital Platform under the Background of Carbon Trading [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(4): 299-312.
[8]	Zhangwei Feng, Bisheng Du, Zhiyong Yu, Shandong Mou. Recycling and Traceability Technology Introducing Strategy of New Energy Vehicles’ Power Battery Driven by Blockchain [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(4): 313-324.
[9]	Xiaobing Li, Yujun Wang, Wei Jiang. Pricing Decision of Closed-loop Supply Chain for Power Battery Recycling Considering Consumer Heterogeneity [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(2): 279-291.
[10]	Wenbin Wang,Ye Liu,Shiyuan Quan,Luosheng Zhong,Jia Lv. Research on Government Subsidy Model of Dual-sales Channel Closed-loop Supply Chain [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(7): 258-269.
[11]	Chuan Zhang,Yuxin Tian,Mengyu Cui. Selection of Hybrid Channel Recycling Modes and Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions for the Electric Vehicle Battery Manufacturer [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(6): 184-195.
[12]	Jiangtao Hong,Yuting Quan. Closed-loop Supply Chain Decision Model Based on Trade-in and Supply Chain Structural Differences [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 147-157.
[13]	Daoping Wang,Ke Zhang,Yu Zhou. Differential Game of Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Dynamic Stochastic Recovery Rate under Reward-penalty Mechanism of Government [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 158-170.
[14]	Chunxiang Huang,Dengfeng Li. Research on Closed-loop Supply Chain Pricing and Profit Distribution Based on Noncooperative-cooperative Biform Game and Deposit Return to Recyclers [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 166-177.
[15]	Junfei Ding, Xujin Pu, Yuxin Cao, Jing Li. Cost-sharing Mechanism for Closed-loop Supply Chain of New Energy Vehicles under EPR [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(12): 257-268.