主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

Chinese Journal of Management Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 116-128.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0473

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction ofLong-term-Multi-directionalSystem Evaluation Method Based on Individual Advantage Identification

Xinan Zhao(), Junling Chen, Chenxi Sun   

  1. School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China
  • Received:2022-03-09 Revised:2022-10-09 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-07-04
  • Contact: Xinan Zhao E-mail:xnzhao@mail.neu.edu.cn

Abstract:

The mastery of the dynamic development of things leads to the need for dynamic evaluation methods.In order to make up for the problems that the evaluation results provided by the single perspective dynamic evaluation method are less informative, the strength of decision support is weak, and the combination evaluation of multiple methods is not coordinated, a “long-acting and multi-directional” systematic evaluation method is proposed based on individual advantage identification.Firstly, in order to ensure the dynamic long-term performance of the evaluation process and fully explore the individual value of the evaluated object, the research framework including value index system under the strategic concept, dynamic data standardization, index weight, evaluation method selection, evaluation Angle and orientation is constructed.Secondly, in order to meet the needs of multi-directional evaluation, on the basis of "individual agent evaluation", the evaluation frameworks of multi-agent multi-factor dynamic evaluation (T-O-F), time-point cross-section dynamic evaluation (t-O-F), single-agent multi-factor dynamic evaluation (T-o-F) and multi-agent single-factor dynamic evaluation (T-O-f) are further constructed.Through model construction and application research, the following conclusions can be drawn:The method is based on the unified strategic concept to carry out multi-directional dynamic evaluation and analysis, and the guiding ideology is clear,it not only avoids the ambiguity of the guiding ideology of the combined evaluation method system, but also avoids the incongruity among the multi-angle evaluation methods.(2) The improved data standardization method has the characteristics of dynamic and long-term effect, which can not only evaluate the current information, but also be compatible with the subsequent newly added information, so as to meet the continuous and long-term needs of dynamic evaluation.(3) the weight of previous evaluation method for curing weights, the pattern of “unified” without respect individual value proposition by the evaluation behavior main body, and based on the individual advantage of feature recognition method, it is concluded that the personalized weight of the differences between the respect for the actors, the evaluation behavior subject can fully show their own good. At the same time, "agent evaluation" method can be evaluated from multiple angles, which is conducive to the objectivity and adequacy of the evaluation results.(4) This method has some functions that the existing evaluation methods do not have. The multi-agent and multi-factor (T-O-F) orientation can reveal the evolution of dynamic dominant characteristics and development level of (n*N) evaluated objects, the time-point cross section (t-O-F) orientation can reveal the dynamic dominant characteristics and development level of the evaluated actors at different time points, and the single-agent and multi-factor (T-o-F) orientation can reveal each evaluated row independently Body development status and multi-agent single factor (T-O-f) orientation can represent the performance of all evaluated actors in the whole stage of single index factor, and reveal the development differences of different evaluated actors in this index, and can also carry out comparative analysis among index factors.To sum up, this method can not only carry out outcome evaluation (evaluation ranking or evaluation value), but also carry out process evaluation, that is, it can identify the dynamic development characteristics and comprehensive level in the development process of things. Thus, “long-term-Multi-directional” process and result dynamic evaluation and analysis can be achieved, and the consistency of single evaluation method and the stability of combined evaluation method can further enhance the objectivity and practicability of evaluation.

Key words: dynamic evaluation system, long-term utility, multi - directional analysis, individual agent evaluation, systematic evaluation

CLC Number: