基于修正Russell方法的模糊决策单元的排序

Abstract

Abstract: Just like crisp case, the problem of the existence of multi efficient decision making units (DMUs) under fuzzy environment is ubiquitous in application of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), this would make decision maker puzzled. To overcome this difficulty, a super efficiency DEA model based on enhanced Russell measure is presented in the paper firstly. Then, based on comparison of fuzzy numbers, a super efficiency DEA model based on enhanced Russell measure under fuzzy environment is also presented. Thereby, the problem of full sorting fuzzy decision making units is solved. Comparative analysis of fuzzy super efficiency DEA model based on enhanced Russell measure and based on CCR model is carried through a numerical example in the end of the paper. The proposed method will be particularly useful when the number of fuzzy DMUs are small compared with the number of criteria employed for evaluation.

Key words: fuzzy, enhanced Russell measure, super efficiency DEA model, rank

CLC Number:

C934

WANG Mei-qiang, LI Yong-jun. Full Rank of Fuzzy Decision Making Units Based on Enhanced Russell Measure[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(3): 115-120.

References

[1] Andersen P, Petersen N C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management science, 1993, 39 (10), 1261-1294.

[2] Sexton T R, Silkman R H, Hogan A J. Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions[M]//Silkman R H. Measuring efficiency: An assessment of data envelopment analysis. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.

[3] Doyle J R, Green R H. Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1994, 45 (5):567-578.

[4] Doyle J R, Green R H. Cross evaluation in DEA: Improving discrimination among DMUs[J]. INFOR, 1995, 33 (3): 205-222.

[5] Guo Pengjun, Tanaka H. Fuzzy DEA: A perceptual evaluation method[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001, 119(1): 149-160.

[6] Leon T, Liern V, Ruiz J L, et al. A fuzzy mathematical programming approach to the assessment of efficiency with DEA models[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 139: 407-417.

[7] Kao C, Liu S T. Fuzzy efficiency measures in data envelopment analysis[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 113(3): 427-437.

[8] Lertworasirikul S.Fuzzy data envelopment analysis (DEA): A possibility approach[J]. Fuzzy sets and systems, 2003, 139(2): 379-394.

[9] Lertworasirikul S. Fuzzy BCC model for data envelopment analysis[J]. Fuzzy optimization and decision making, 2003, 2(4): 337-358.

[10] Soleimani-damaneh M, Jahanshahloo G R. Computational and theoretical pitfalls in some current performance measurement techniques; and a new approach[J]. Applied mathematics and computation, 2006, 181(2): 1199-1207.

[11] 王美强, 梁樑, 李勇军. 超效率DEA模型的模糊扩展[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(2):115-124.

[12] 王美强, 梁樑.具有三角模糊要素的非径向DEA模型[J].系统工程, 2008, 26 (1):91-95.

[13] 吴文江, 陈颖. 用DEA解输入或输出为模糊数的评价问题[J]. 系统工程理论方法应用, 2000, 9(4):331-334.

[14] 曾祥云, 吴育华. L-R型区间DEA模型及其变换[J]. 系统工程, 2000, 18(2):60-65.

[15] 吴海平, 宣国良, 帅旭.基于LR模糊数的置信DEA模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2003, (9):28-34.

[16] 张茂勤, 李光金, 尚文娟. 基于Campos指数的模糊DEA[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2004, (4):41-48.

[17] 李志亮, 陈世功, 吴今培. 基于模糊变换的DEA模型与应用[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2004, 18(4):64-71.

[18] 黄朝峰, 廖良才.模糊条件下的决策单元相对有效性评价[J]. 模糊系统与数学, 2006, 20(5):77-83.

[19] Fare R, Gosskoff s, Lovell C A K. The measurement of efficiency of production[M]. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1985.

[20] Pastor J T, Ruiz T L. An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999, 115(3): 596-607.

[21] Cooper W W, Huang Zhimin. Efficiency aggregation with Russell measures in data envelopment analysis[J]. Socio-Economics planning sciences, 2006, 41(1):1-21.

[22] Charnes A, Cooper W W. Programming with linear fractional functional[J].Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 1962, 15:333-334.

[23] Ramik J. Inequality relation between fuzzy numbers and its use in fuzzy optimization[J]. Fuzzy sets and systems, 1985, 16(2): 123-138.

[24] Tanaka H. A formulation of fuzzy linear programming problem based on comparison of fuzzy numbers[J]. Control and Cybernetics, 1984, 13: 185-194.

Full Rank of Fuzzy Decision Making Units Based on Enhanced Russell Measure

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	LI Lei, ZHANG Shu-yang. Aggregation Method of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers with Minimized Maximal Compromise under Consensus Condition [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 168-176.
[2]	WANG Ze-zhou, CHEN Yun-xiang, XIANG Hua-chun. Research on an Improved Expert Cluster Weighting Method Based on Fuzzy Kernel Clustering [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 177-183.
[3]	GU Jing, ZENG Lu-xuan, LI Wen-xin, XU Ze-shui. A Class of Sequential Decision Making Methods: Lens and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Perspective [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1): 24-35.
[4]	LI Peng, SHEN Zhi-jie. Pythagorean Fuzzy Uncertain Linguistic Decision Making Method Based on Heronian Mean Operator [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1): 217-225.
[5]	WANG Xian-dong, HE Jian-min. Pricing Asian Options under Uncertain Environment with Fuzziness and Randomness Considering Decision Maker's Subjective Judgment [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(9): 33-44.
[6]	WANG Yan-yan, SUN Bai-qing. Multi-period Optimization Model of Multi-type Emergency Materials Allocation Based on Fuzzy Information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(3): 40-51.
[7]	LIANG Xiao-zhen, WU Zhi-kun, YANG Ming-ge, WANG Shou-yang. Air Passenger Demand Forecasting Based on a Dual Decomposition Strategy and Fuzzy Time Series Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(12): 108-117.
[8]	Gong Ri-zhao, Pan Fen-ping. A Possibility Degree Model for Ranking Interval Numbers under Non-uniform Distribution and its Application [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(12): 220-230.
[9]	LEI Shao-yong, LIU Jing-xu. Equipment Procurement Optimization Based on Genetic Algorithm [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(10): 194-200.
[10]	QU Guo-hua, LIU Xue, LI Yue-jiao, QU Wei-hua, LI Shi-yu, ZHANG Qiang. Fuzzy Game Analysis of Government Participation in Supervision Behavior and the Third Party International Environmental Audit of Enterprise [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(1): 113-121.
[11]	YIN Jin, HU Xiang-pei, ZHENG Yi, ZHOU Zi-xuan. Fuzzy Fusion Model of Consumers’ Perceived Trust Based on Experience and Recommendation in Social Commerce [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(1): 122-133.
[12]	ZOU Xing-qi, YANG Qing. R&D Project Portfolio Selection Based on Domination and Diffusion Relationship in the Project Network [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(4): 198-209.
[13]	ZHANG Jian. Research on the Model of Supplier Selection with HTFWGBM Operator [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3): 137-143.
[14]	ZENG Shou-zhen, MU Zhi-min. A Method Based on Hybrid Weighted Distance for Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS Multiple-attribute Decision Making [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3): 198-205.
[15]	LIU Dong-hai, LIU Yuan-yuan, CHEN Xiao-hong. Study on Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Mean-Standard Deviation Preference Distance Measure Using Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguisticterm Sets [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(1): 174-183.