[1] Roeser S. Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions[J]. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 2012, 32(6): 1033-1040. [2] Hart P S, Feldman L. Threat without efficacy? Climate change on US network news[J]. Science Communication, 2014, 36(3): 325-351. [3] Hornsey M J, Fielding K S. A cautionary note about messages of hope: focusing on progress in reducing carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2016, 39: 26-34. [4] 国际能源署.2018全球能源和二氧化碳状况报告[R].巴黎:国际能源署,2019.http://www.huanjing100.com/p-5752.html.International Energy Agency. Global energy & CO2 status report[R]. Paris: International Energy Agency, 2019. http://www.huanjing100.com/p-5752.html. [5] Chu Haoran, Yang J Z. Emotion and the psychological distance of climate change[J]. Science Communication, 2019, 41(6): 761-789. [6] Howell R, Shackley S, Mabon L, et al. Engaging the public with low-carbon energy technologies: results from a Scottish large group process[J]. Energy Policy, 2014, 66: 496-506. [7] Fan Jingli, Xu Mao, Yang Lin, et al. Benefit evaluation of investment in CCS retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and PV power plants in China based on real options[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 115: 109350. [8] 尹聪慧, 余翔. 基于专利信息的CCS技术创新网络图谱分析[J]. 技术经济, 2018, 37(5): 64-70+114.Yin Conghui, Yu Xiang. Analysis on CCS technology innovation network map based on patent information[J]. Journal of Technology Economics, 2018, 37(5): 64-70+114. [9] 王喜平, 郄少媛. 碳交易机制下供应链CCS投资时机研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2020, 34(2): 124-130.Wang Xiping, Qie Shaoyuan. Research on the timing of CCS investment in supply chain under carbon emission trading[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2020, 34(2): 124-130. [10] Guo Jianxin, Huang Chen. Feasible roadmap for CCS retrofit of coal-based power plants to reduce Chinese carbon emissions by 2050[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 259: 114112. [11] Fan Jingli, Wei Shijie, Zhang Xian, et al.A comparison of the regional investment benefits of CCS retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and renewable power generation projects in China[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2020, 92: 102858. [12] 刘德海, 柴瑞瑞, 方乐. 逻辑斯蒂情绪效用如何影响群体性事件的均衡结果?[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(7): 1807-1816.Liu Dehai, Chai Ruirui, Fang Le. How logistic emotional utility will affect the equilibrium of mass incidents?[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(7): 1807-1816. [13] 杨阳, 王杰. 情绪因素影响下的突发事件网络舆情演化研究[J]. 情报科学, 2020, 38(3): 35-41+69.Yang Yang, Wang Jie. The evolution of emergency network public opinion influenced by emotional factors[J]. Information Science, 2020, 38(3): 35-41+69. [14] 徐浩, 张妍, 谭德庆. 参与者情绪对环境污染邻避冲突影响的演化分析[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(3): 121-126.Xu Hao, Zhang Yan, Tan Deqing. Evolutionary equilibrium analysis of the influence of participants’ emotions on environmental NIMBY conflict[J]. Soft Science, 2019, 33(3): 121-126. [15] Quiggin J. A theory of anticipated utility[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1982, 3(4): 323-343. [16] 刘德海, 鲍雪言, 王谢宁. 恐怖袭击事件中悲观/乐观情绪如何影响博弈均衡结果[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(10): 80-88.Liu Dehai, Bao Xueyan, Wang Xiening. How does the pessimistic or optimistic emotion influence the game equilibrium outcome in incidents of violence and terrorism[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(10): 80-88. [17] 熊国强, 张婷, 王海涛. 情绪影响下群体性冲突的RDEU博弈模型分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(9): 162-170.Xiong Guoqiang, Zhang Ting, Wang Haitao. The RDEU game model analysis of group conflict influenced by emotion[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2015, 23(9): 162-170. [18] 丁辉. 低碳示范项目融资和风险管理——以富氧燃烧碳捕集项目为例[J]. 江淮论坛, 2019(1): 74-81.Ding Hui. Finance and risk management of low carbon demonstration projects——taking the oxygen enriched combustion carbon capture project as an example[J]. Jiang-huai Tribune, 2019(1): 74-81.
|