绿色供应链中不对称需求预测下的信息共享研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.04.010

中国管理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 104-114.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.04.010

绿色供应链中不对称需求预测下的信息共享研究

士明军^1,2, 王勇^1,2, 但斌^1,2, 文悦^1,2

1. 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400044;
2. 重庆大学现代物流重庆重点实验室, 重庆 400044

收稿日期:2017-10-04 修回日期:2018-08-21 出版日期:2019-04-20 发布日期:2019-06-12
通讯作者: 王勇(1957-),男(汉族),四川内江人,重庆大学经济与工商管理学院教授,研究方向:物流与供应链,E-mail:wangyongcq@126.com E-mail:wangyongcq@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71672015）；国家社会科学基金重大项目（15ZDB169）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目（2017CDJSK02PT09）

Information Sharing in a Green Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Forecasts

SHI Ming-jun^1,2, WANG Yong^1,2, DAN Bin^1,2, WEN Yue^1,2

1. School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Logistics, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China

Received:2017-10-04 Revised:2018-08-21 Online:2019-04-20 Published:2019-06-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了由一个制造商和一个零售商组成的绿色供应链和他们的需求预测信息共享问题。考虑了两种方案：订货型生产方案和库存型生产方案，两种方案下分别考虑了无信息共享和信息共享两种情况。分析了预测信息对两种方案下制造商利润、零售商利润和信息共享价值的影响，同时研究了绿色成本系数对信息共享的影响。研究表明，两种方案中制造商始终能从信息共享中获利，而零售商只有在制造商绿色成本系数较低时才会自愿共享预测信息。当绿色成本系数较高时，制造商可以通过一个讨价还价合同，促进零售商进行信息共享。当绿色成本系数很高时，供应链成员之间不存在信息共享。此外，库存型生产方案中信息共享带来的总收益增量要高于订货型生产方案，因此，库存型生产方案中参与者信息共享的可能性要高于订货型生产方案。

关键词: 绿色供应链, 信息预测, 订货型生产, 库存型生产, 信息共享

Abstract: Due to the rapid changes in business environment, it is difficult for green supply chain members to make accurate decisions in the face of highly uncertain market conditions.However, supply chain members can forecast uncertain market demand based on past sales data.Given this background, a problem of information sharing under asymmetric demand forecasting in green supply chain is studied. Two scenarios are investigated:the "make-to-order"scenario and the "make-to-stock" scenario, considering two situations:with information sharing and without information sharing. The optimal decision and optimal expected profit of the manufacturers and retailers in several cases are obtained. Through the comparison of the optimal expected profits, it is found the value of information sharing and a bargaining mechanism can coordinate the supply chain.
The research shows thatmanufacturers are always profitable from information sharing in both scenarios. Unlike previous studies, retailers can also benefit from information sharing when the green cost factor is low.When the green cost factor is high, manufacturers can promote retailers to share information through a bargaining contract. Additionally, when the green cost factor is high, there is no information sharing between members of the green supply chain. Furthermore, the increase of total revenue brought by information sharing in "make-to-stock" scenario is higher than that of the total revenue in "make-to-order"scenario. Therefore, the possibility of participant information sharing in the "make-to-stock" scenario is higher than that of the "make-to-order"scenario. Finally, the sensitivity analysis of some parameters influences the accuracy and correlation of the forecast information on the profit of the manufacturer, the value of the manufacturer's information sharing, and the value of the information sharing of the supply chain.

Key words: green supply chain, demand forecasts, make-to-order scenario, make-to-stock scenario, informationsharing

中图分类号:

F253

士明军, 王勇, 但斌, 文悦. 绿色供应链中不对称需求预测下的信息共享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 104-114.

SHI Ming-jun, WANG Yong, DAN Bin, WEN Yue. Information Sharing in a Green Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Forecasts[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(4): 104-114.

参考文献

[1] Zheng Yi, Hu Fang, Xu Yujiao. Pricing strategy research of green supply chain based on products substitution[C]//Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013:1095-1101.

[2] Zhu Qinghua, Cote RP. Integrating green supply chain management into an embryonic eco-industrial development:A case study of the Guitang group[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2004,12(8):1025-1035.

[3] Sarkis J,Zhu Qinghua,Geng Yong. Greening the supply chain[J]. Apparel Magazine, 2006, 100(9):63-63.

[4] 朱庆华, 窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6):86-95.

[5] Srivastava S K. Green supply chain management:A state of the art literture reviw[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007, 9(1):53-80.

[6] Wati Y, Koo C. The green IT practices of Nokia, Samsung, Sony, and Sony Ericsson:Content analysis approach[C]//43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,Huwaii, IEEE, 2010:1-10.

[7] 戴远程. 海尔启动绿色战略[N],南方日报,2011-11-05.

[8] Bemporad R, Baranowski M. Conscious consumers are changing the rules of marketing. Are you ready? Highlights from the BBMG conscious consumer report[Z].http://www.bbmg.com, 2007.

[9] OECD. Report of the OECD workshop on information and consumer decisionmaking for sustainable consumption[R]. Working Paper,Working Party on National Environmental Policy,2002.

[10] Ghosh D, Shah J. A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 135(2):568-583.

[11] Liu Z, Anderson T D, Cruz J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 218(3):602-613.

[12] Ghosh D, Shah J. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 164:319-329.

[13] Li Bo, Zhu Mengyan, Jiang Yushan, et al. Pricing policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112(20):2029-2042.

[14] Zhu Wenge, He Yuanjie. Green product design in supply chains under competition[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 258(1):165-180.

[15] 朱庆华, 窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(6):86-95.

[16] 江世英, 李随成. 考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型及收益共享契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6):169-176.

[17] 陈志松. 政府激励政策下人造板绿色供应链谈判-协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2016, 24(2):115-124.

[18] Shang Weixin, Ha A Y, Tong Shilu. Information sharing in a supply chain with a common retailer[J]. Management Science, 2015, 62(1):245-263.

[19] Yue Xiaohang, Liu J. Demand forecast sharing in a dual-channel supply chain[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(1):646-667.

[20] Mishra B K, Raghunathan S, Yue X. Demand forecast sharing in supply chains[J]. Production & Operations Management, 2010, 18(2):152-166.

[21] 高鹏, 聂佳佳, 谢忠秋. 考虑消费者绿色偏好的供应链信息分享策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2013, 33(12):1435-1446.

[22] 谢印成, 高鹏, 聂佳佳. 考虑制造商竞争的绿色供应链信息分享策略研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2015,(8):174-179.

[23] Winkler R L. Combining probability distributions from dependent information sources[J]. Management Science, 1981, 27(4):479-488.

[24] Xu Xiaoping, He Ping, Xu Hao, et al. Supply chain coordination with green technology under cap-and-trade regulation[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 183:433-442.

[25] Zhang Qiao, Tang Wansheng, Zhang Jianxiong. Green supply chain performance with cost learning and operational inefficiency effects[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112:3267-3284.

[26] Nagarajan M, Bassok Y. A bargaining framework in supply chains:The assembly problem[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(8):1482-1496.

绿色供应链中不对称需求预测下的信息共享研究

Information Sharing in a Green Supply Chain with Asymmetric Demand Forecasts

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	郭鑫鑫, 王海燕, 许蒙蒙. 医疗信息共享对患者转移数量和服务质量水平影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 226-236.
[2]	桑圣举, 张强. 基于不确定理论的绿色供应链最优决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 127-136.
[3]	王文隆, 王成军. 基于竞争型制造商创新投入的零售商需求预测信息共享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 127-138.
[4]	张玉华, 戴更新, 孙浩, 韩广华, 王磊. 基于信任的供应预测信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 112-121.
[5]	吴江华, 姜帆. 供应链中具有产能限制的竞争企业中的信息共享研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 146-158.
[6]	冯华, 聂蕾, 施雨玲. 供应链治理机制与供应链绩效之间的相互作用关系——基于信息共享的中介效应和信息技术水平的调节效应[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 104-114.
[7]	成燕, 梅姝娥, 仲伟俊. 用户隐私风险感知对平台社交账号登录方式选择的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 196-207.
[8]	周茂森, 张庆宇. 双向部分透明供应链的大数据投资决策与激励[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 130-144.
[9]	周建亨, 冉芸. 基于策略性竞争博弈的供应链信息共享策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 88-102.
[10]	许明辉, 杨东升. 制造商成本削减策略对风险规避型零售商信息共享策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 77-87.
[11]	官子力, 张旭梅, 但斌. 需求不确定下制造商服务投入影响销售的供应链信息共享与激励[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 56-65.
[12]	苏兵, 林刚, 程新峰, 孙璐璐. 突发性片堵塞下两车信息共享的加拿大旅行者问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(7): 151-158.
[13]	曲优, 关志民, 叶同, 陶瑾. 基于混合CVaR的供应链绿色研发-广告决策与协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(10): 89-101.
[14]	肖群, 马士华. 信息不对称对闭环供应链MTO和MTS模式的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 139-148.
[15]	但斌, 周茂森, 张旭梅. 存在竞争性制造商的集团采购供应链需求预测信息的共享与激励[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(3): 41-51.