主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 87-98.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1854

• 论文 • 上一篇    

政府补贴方式对绿色供应链制造商减排决策的影响机制

贺勇, 陈志豪, 廖诺   

  1. 广东工业大学管理学院,广东 广州510520
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-15 修回日期:2020-07-29 发布日期:2022-06-24
  • 通讯作者: 廖诺(1981-),女(汉族),贵州人,广东工业大学管理学院,教授,博士,研究方向:低碳供应链、能源经济与管理, Email: laura.first@163.com. E-mail:laura.first@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71974038);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金资助项目(2022A1515010758);教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(21YJAZH048);广东省哲学社科规划基金资助项目(GD18CGL10);广州市社科规划基金资助项目(2018GZYB64)

The Impact Mechanism of Government Subsidy Approach on Manufacturer’s Decision-making in Green Supply Chain

HE Yong, CHEN Zhi-hao, LIAO Nuo   

  1. School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China
  • Received:2019-11-15 Revised:2020-07-29 Published:2022-06-24
  • Contact: 廖诺 E-mail:laura.first@163.com

摘要: 考虑制造商自主研发减排与外包减排任务两种情形,研究政府分别依据减排研发和单位产品减排量进行补贴下供应链的最优决策问题。从供应链制造商的角度,对给定政府补贴方式下,制造商的两种减排决策进行了对比,同时从政府的角度,在制造商特定的减排情形下,两种政府补贴方式的减排效果进行比较。进一步,通过数值仿真分析两种补贴方式下补贴系数对供应链决策的影响。研究结果表明,当政府采取依据减排研发的补贴方式进行补贴时,自主研发减排情形下制造商利润大于外包减排任务情形的利润;当政府采取依据单位产品减排量的补贴方式时,相比外包减排任务,制造商选择自主研发减排均能得到更多的减排量和利润。当制造商自主研发减排时,政府依据减排研发补贴方式比单位产品减排量补贴方式的减排效果更好,但利润较低;当制造商外包减排任务时,两种政府补贴方式的减排效果和利润均相等。通过数值仿真验证了以上结果,同时表明补贴系数对减排效果和利润具有显著影响。以上结论为政府制定合理的补贴方式及企业减排策略的选择提供了理论支撑。

关键词: 补贴方式;碳减排;绿色供应链;减排外包;Stackelberg模型

Abstract: There have been a large number of fruitful work on supply chain decision-making considering government subsidies, but only the decision-making issues of manufacturers’ independent R&D emission reduction has been studied, and the production decision making when manufacturers outsource emission reduction tasks has not been considered. None of the literatures have explored the impact of different government subsidy approaches on manufacturer’s emission reduction options. In view of the above consideration, a three-level green supply chain is constructed that composed of suppliers, manufacturers and consumers to explore this issue. Considering the manufacturer investing R&D to emission reduction or outsourcing the emission reduction task, the Stackelberg game model is employed to explore the decision-making issue under the government subsidy approaches basing on emission reduction R&D investment or emission reduction amount of unit product in green supply chain.From the perspective of manufacturer, the manufacturer’s decisions of two actions for emission reduction are compared when given government subsidy approach. Secondly, from the government’s perspective, when manufacturer’s action is given, the effects of emission reduction between two approaches of government subsidy are compared. Further, numerical simulation is conducted to analyze the impact of subsidy factors on supply chain’s decision-making under two subsidy approaches. The results show that when the government adopts the subsidy method basing on emission reduction R&D investment, manufacturer's profit of R&D emission by themselves is higher than outsourcing emission reduction task. When the government adopts the subsidies basing on emission reduction amount of unit product, the manufacturer’ profit and the emission reduction amount per unit of product in investing R&D to emission are more than the outsourcing emission reduction task. When manufacturer chooses to invest R&D to emission reduction, compared to subsidy approach of basing on emission reduction of unit product, the amount of emission reduction of the government subsidy basing on R&D investment is higher, and the profit is lower. When the manufacturer outsources the emission reduction task, the carbon reduction effect and the profit in the two approaches of government subsidies are identical. Numerical simulations are conducted to verify the above results, and it shows that the subsidy coefficient has significant impact on the emission reduction and profit.These conclusions provide theoretical basis and significant implications for the government to formulate reasonable subsidy policy and the enterprise to choose proper emission reduction strategies.

Key words: subsidy approach; carbon emission reduction; green supply chain; emission reduction outsourcing; Stackelbergmodel

中图分类号: