[1] Zhu Qinghua, Joseph Sarkis, Kee-hung Lai. Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2013, 19(2): 106-117. [2] 程粟粟,易永锡,李寿德.碳捕获与碳封存机制下跨界污染控制微分博弈[J].系统管理学报,2019,28(5):864-872.Cheng Susu, Yi Yongxi, Li Shoude. A differential game of transboundary pollution for carbon capture and storage[J]. Journal of Systems & Management, 2019,28(5):864-872. [3] 王文宾,周维明,张梦,等.考虑政府引导制造商节能的闭环供应链决策模型研究[J].中国管理科学,2018, 26(7):108-118.Wang Wenbin, Zhou Weiming, Zhang Meng, et al. Closed-loop supply chain decision model of considering the government guidance on manufacturer energy saving[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018,26(7):108-118. [4] 周辉,柳键,江玮璠,等.产品绿色创新决策与绿色渠道激励机制设计[J].系统科学学报,2020, 28(1):61-66+97.Zhou Hui, Liu Jian, Jiang Weifan, et al. Product green innovation decisions and green channel incentive mechanism design[J]. Journal of Systems Science, 2020, 28(1):61-66+97. [5] 缐杰,吴峤滨.最高人民法院、最高人民检察院《关于办理环境污染刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释》理解与适用[J].人民检察,2017(5):21-26.Xian Jie, Wu Qiaobin. Understanding and application of the interpretation of the supreme people’s court and the supreme people’s procuratorate on several issues concerning the application of law in handling criminal cases of environmental pollution[J]. People’s Procuratorate, 2017(5):21-26. [6] 李婧婧,李勇建,刘露,等.激励绿色供应链企业开展生态设计的机制决策[J].系统工程理论与实践,2019, 39(9): 2287-2299.Li Jingjing, Li Yongjian, Liu Lu, et al. Mechanism decisions to encourage product eco-design implemented by green supply chain enterprises[J] Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(9): 2287-2299. [7] 白春光,唐家福.制造–销售企业绿色供应链合作博弈分析[J]. 系统工程学报,2017, 32(6): 818-828.Bai Chunguang, Tang Jiafu. Manufacturing-marketing green supply chain cooperative game analysis[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017,32(6): 818-828. [8] 曲优,关志民,叶同,等.基于混合CVaR的供应链绿色研发-广告决策与协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2018, 26(10): 89-101.Qu You, Guan Zhimin, Ye Tong, et al. Supply chain coordination for green innovation-advertisement decisions based on mixture CVaR criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(10): 89-101. [9] 甘志华,张成堂.异质产品环境下绿色供应链的定价策略[J]. 统计与决策,2015(20): 51-53.Gan Zhihua, Zhang Chengtang. Pricing strategies for green supply chains in heterogeneous product environments[J]. Statistics & Decision, 2015(20): 51-53. [10] 张正,孟庆春,张文姬.技术创新情形下考虑政府补贴的供应链价值创造研究[J]. 软科学,2019, 33(1): 39-44. [11] Zhang Chengtang, Liu Liping. Research on coordination mechanism in three-level green chain under non-cooperative game[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2013,37(5): 3369-3379. [12] Ghosh D, Shah J. A comparative analysis of greening policies across supply chain structures[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 135(2): 568-583. [13] Li Bo, Zhu Mengyan, Jiang Yushan, et al. Policies of a competitive dual-channel green supply chain[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112(20): 2029-2042. [14] 曹柬, 吴晓波, 周根贵. 基于产品效用异质性的绿色供应链协调策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2011(6): 161-168.Cao Jian, Wu Xiaobo, Zhou Gengui. Coordination strategy of green supply chain based on product’s utility diversity[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2011(6): 161-168. [15] 江世英, 李随成. 考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型及收益共享契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 169-176.Jiang Shiying, Li Suicheng. Green supply chain game models and revenue sharing contract with product green degree[J] Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015,23(6): 169-176. [16] 黄辉, 杨冬辉, 严永,等. 公平偏好下考虑产品绿色度的闭环供应链定价决策[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2018, 23(6): 166-176.Huang Hui, Yang Donghui, Yan Yong, et al. closed-loop supply chain pricing decision considering greenness of products under fairness preference[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2018, 23(6): 166-176. [17] 朱庆华, 窦一杰. 基于政府补贴分析的绿色供应链管理博弈模型[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011(6): 90-99.Zhu Qinghua, Dou Yijie. A game model for green supply chain management based on government subsidies[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2011(6): 90-99. [18] 傅端香,张子元,原白云.政府补贴政策下考虑风险规避的绿色供应链定价决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理,2019(9): 33-40+84.Fu Duanxiang, Zhang Ziyuan, Yuan Baiyun. Research on green supply chain pricing decision considering risk aversion under government subsidies[J]. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019(9):33-40+84. [19] Lambertini L, Mantovani A. Process and product innovation by a multiproduct monopolist: a dynamic approach[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2009, 27(4): 508-518. [20] Kouvelis P, Mukhopadhyay S K. Competing on design quality: A strategic planning approach for product quality with the use of a control theoretic model[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 1995, 12(3-4): 369-385. [21] El Ouardighi F, Tapiero C S. Quality and the diffusion of innovations[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 106(1): 31-38. [22] El Ouardighi F, Kim B. Supply quality management with wholesale price and revenue-sharing contracts under horizontal competition[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 206(2): 329-340. [23] Lin Ping, Saggi K. Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition[J]. European Economic Review, 2002, 46(1): 201-211. [24] Battigalli P, Fumagalli C, Polo M. Buyer power and quality improvements[J]. Research in Economics, 2007, 61(2): 45-61. [25] 霍沛军, 陈继祥, 陈剑. R&D补贴与社会次佳R&D[J]. 管理工程学报, 2004(2): 4-6.Huo Peijun, Chen Jixiang, Chen Jian. R&D Subsidies and Socially Second-Best R&D[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2004(2): 4-6. [26] 李伟, 李凯. 考虑渠道势力和研发溢出的竞争制造商研发决策研究[J].中国管理科学, 2019,27(5): 196-207.Li Wei, Li Kai. The innovation decisions of competitive manufacturers when considering channel power and spillover[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019,27(5): 196-207. [27] 张西征,刘志远,王静.企业规模与R&D投入关系研究——基于企业盈利能力的分析[J].科学学研究,2012, 30(2): 265-274.Zhang Xizheng, Liu Zhiyuan, Wang Jing. The analysis of the relationship between firm size and R&D investment based on the firm’s profitability[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2012, 30(2): 265-274. [28] Li Shoude. Dynamic control of a multiproduct monopolist firm’s product and process innovation[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2018, 69(5): 714-733.
|