中国管理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 319-324.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2416
• • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2020-12-21
修回日期:
2022-07-13
出版日期:
2024-01-25
发布日期:
2024-02-08
通讯作者:
张剑
E-mail:bjtuzj@bjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
Jian Zhang1(),Shuang He1,Pujie Shi1,Juliang Zhang2
Received:
2020-12-21
Revised:
2022-07-13
Online:
2024-01-25
Published:
2024-02-08
Contact:
Jian Zhang
E-mail:bjtuzj@bjtu.edu.cn
摘要:
本文研究了期初库存水平和存储能力约束下缺货替代竞争的多周期订货博弈问题。两种可相互替代的产品分别由两个零售商销售,当购买某一产品的顾客遇到缺货时会转而购买另外一种产品。零售商通过选择订货量来争取替代需求,订货后的库存量大于期初库存水平且小于各自的存储能力。研究发现,多周期博弈存在纳什均衡解。当仅考虑期初库存水平约束时,零售商的均衡订货策略是一种广义的Base-stock策略。在存储能力约束下,本文提出了一种改进的Base-stock策略。这两种均衡订货策略包含了非竞争条件下的最优订货策略。数值实验表明,替代竞争会导致零售商订更多的货;与短视策略相比,本文提出的订货策略能够增加零售商收益。
中图分类号:
张剑,何爽,师璞杰,张菊亮. 替代竞争情境下考虑期初库存水平和存储能力约束的多周期订货博弈问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 319-324.
Jian Zhang,Shuang He,Pujie Shi,Juliang Zhang. Multi-period Inventory Substitute Competition under the Initial Inventory Level and the Capacity Constraints[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(1): 319-324.
表1
不同顾客转移比例下两种订货策略的比较."
策略 | 合计 | 损益值 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 | 短视 | 59.15 | 409.03 | 59.15 | 409.03 | 59.15 | 409.03 |
Base-stock | 65.07 | 453.16 | 65.07 | 453.16 | 65.07 | 453.16 | |
0.7 | 短视 | 50.51 | 350.07 | 50.51 | 350.07 | 50.51 | 350.07 |
Base-stock | 52.68 | 366.91 | 52.68 | 366.91 | 52.68 | 366.91 | |
0.5 | 短视 | 52.85 | 367.26 | 52.85 | 367.26 | 52.85 | 367.26 |
Base-stock | 56.39 | 392.21 | 56.39 | 392.21 | 56.39 | 392.21 | |
0.3 | 短视 | 49.39 | 341.98 | 49.39 | 341.98 | 49.39 | 341.98 |
Base-stock | 51.42 | 354.21 | 51.42 | 354.21 | 51.42 | 354.21 | |
0.1 | 短视 | 49.75 | 342.83 | 49.75 | 342.83 | 49.75 | 342.83 |
Base-stock | 53.08 | 368.14 | 53.08 | 368.14 | 53.08 | 368.14 |
1 | Mason J B, Wilkinson J B. Supermarket product availability and the consumer response[J]. Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 1977,47(1): 153-158. |
2 | Emmelhainz M A, Stock J R, Emmelhainz L W. Guest commentary: consumer responses to retail stock-outs[J]. Journal of Retailing, 1991, 67(2): 138-147. |
3 | Sonnet M C. Cost of stockouts in the microprocessor business and its impact in determining the optimal service level[D]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005. |
4 | Sanchez-Ruiz L, Blanco B, Kyguolienė A. A theoretical overview of the stockout problem in retail: from causes to consequences[J]. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 2018, 79(1): 103-116. |
5 | Parlar M. Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demands[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 1988, 35(3): 397-409. |
6 | Lippman S A, McCardle K F. The competitive newsboy[J]. Operations Research, 1997, 45(1): 54-65. |
7 | Netessine S, Rudi N. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution[J]. Operations Research, 2003, 51(2): 329-335. |
8 | Li M, Petruzzi N C, Zhang J. Overconfident competing newsvendors[J]. Management Science, 2016, 63(8): 2637-2646. |
9 | Wu M, Zhu S X, Bai T. A loss averse competitive newsvendor problem with anchoring[J]. Omega, 2018, 81: 99-111. |
10 | Wu D S, Zhang B F, Baron O. A trade credit model with asymmetric competing retailers[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2019, 28(1): 206-231. |
11 | Silbermayr L. A review of non-cooperative newsvendor games with horizontal inventory interactions [J]. Omega, 2019: 102148. |
12 | 苏兵, 徐渝, 陈金亮,等. 单周期二人博弈可替代产品库存模型的应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, 13(1): 53-59. |
Su B, Xu Y, Chen J L, et al. Research on the substitutable product inventory model and its application[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2005, 13(1): 53-59. | |
13 | 杜宾,邱菀华 .基于信息更新的报童模型理性预期均衡分析[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版), 2010, 23(4): 44-47. |
Du B, Qiu W H. Rational expectations equilibrium analysis to newsvendor model with updating information[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (Social Sciences Edition), 2010, 23(4): 44-47. | |
14 | 陈敬贤,王国华,梁樑 .顾客退货影响的多零售商库存博弈[J].系统工程学报, 2013, 28(1): 101-108. |
Chen J X, Wang G H, Liang L. Inventory game among multi retailers under customer returns' impact[J]. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2013, 28(1): 101-108. | |
15 | 曹国昭,齐二石 .替代品竞争环境下损失厌恶报童问题研究[J].管理学报, 2013, 10(6):898-904. |
Cao G Z, Qi E S. Loss-averse newsvendor problem based on competition between substitutable products[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2013, 10(6):898-904. | |
16 | Avsar Z M, Baykal‐Gursoy M. Inventory control under substitutable demand: a stochastic game application[J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2002, 49(4): 359-375. |
17 | Nagarajan M, Rajagopalan S. A multiperiod model of inventory competition[J]. Operations Research, 2009, 57(3): 785-790. |
18 | Olsen T L, Parker R P. Inventory management under market size dynamics[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(10): 1805-1821. |
19 | Olsen T L, Parker R P. On Markov equilibria in dynamic inventory competition[J]. Operations Research, 2014, 62(2): 332-344. |
20 | 张剑, 张菊亮. 供应不确定条件下多周期库存博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(4): 67-77. |
Zhang J, Zhang J L. Multi-period inventory competition under yield uncertainty[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(4): 67-77. | |
21 | Hwang H C, Heuvel W V D, Wagelmans A P M. The economic lot-sizing problem with lost sales and bounded inventory[J]. IIE Transactions, 2013, 45(8): 912-924. |
22 | Zhong J H, Chu F, Chu C B, et al. Polynomial dynamic programming algorithms for lot sizing models with bounded inventory and stock-out and/or backlogging[J]. Journal of Systems Science & Systems Engineering, 2016, 25(3): 370-397. |
23 | Gayon J P, Massonnet G, Rapine C, et al. Constant approximation algorithms for the one warehouse multiple retailers problem with backlog or lost-sales[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 250(1): 155-166. |
24 | Gayon J P, Massonnet G, Rapine C, et al. Fast approximation algorithms for the One-Warehouse Multi-Retailer problem under general cost structures and capacity constraints[J]. Mathematics of Operations Research, 2017, 42(3): 854-875. |
25 | Cachon G P, Netessine S. Game theory in supply chain analysis[A]. Handbook of quantitative supply chain analysis: Modeling in the e-business era[C]. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, 2004: 13-65. |
26 | Topkis D M. Supermodularity and complementarity [M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1998. |
[1] | 陈威,田永乐,马永开,白春光. 可再生能源储能租赁模式对电力质量和电价决策的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 309-318. |
[2] | 姚凡军,肖汉,高野,高红伟. 碳配额交易政策下考虑消费者偏好和成员行为的供应链微分博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 231-241. |
[3] | 闫达文,李存,迟国泰. 基于混频数据的中国上市公司财务困境动态预测研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(1): 1-12. |
[4] | 宋妍,张鹭,张明. 基于微分博弈的环境税政策效果研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(12): 240-248. |
[5] | 冯春,郭倩芸. 考虑消费者感知的扶贫农产品质量定位研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(11): 103-113. |
[6] | 李峰,王月,梁樑,寇纲. 具有共享产出固定和约束的DEA两阶段效率评价方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(11): 268-278. |
[7] | 王文宾,刘业,钟罗升,戚金钰,仝鹏. 补贴-惩罚政策下废旧动力电池的回收决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(11): 90-102. |
[8] | 赖红珍,周艳菊,王傅强. 新零售背景下贸易信贷对资金约束零售商渠道选择的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(10): 205-214. |
[9] | 周家屹,冯连勇,朱金宏. 基于生物物理经济学思想的碳排放权价值测算模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(10): 96-105. |
[10] | 包春兵,金宗凯,戎晓霞,孟庆春,于宇. 环保刚性约束下中小企业污染共治策略演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 137-147. |
[11] | 单而芳. 河流洪水风险控制的合作博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 45-51. |
[12] | 郑月龙, 周冰洁, 白春光, 蔡琴. 双向协同下产业共性技术跨组织合作研发微分博弈模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 255-265. |
[13] | 唐金环,杨芳,姜力文. 疫情冲击下考虑产业政策对汽车制造商生产的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(8): 122-131. |
[14] | 陈崇萍,卓晓坡,陈杰. 不同付款方式下供应不确定企业的采购源与定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(8): 162-172. |
[15] | 许博,左莉琳,金珈伊,岳欣明,王紫薇. 基于演化博弈的“双边-集中”电力市场交易机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(8): 193-203. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||
|