Chinese Journal of Management Science ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 347-355.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.2212
Previous Articles Next Articles
Lianwei Li1, Canxiang Lin1, Zhuo Lv2(), Shuhan Zhou3
Received:
2023-12-28
Revised:
2024-04-16
Online:
2025-02-25
Published:
2025-03-06
Contact:
Zhuo Lv
E-mail:lvzhuo200889@126.com
CLC Number:
Lianwei Li, Canxiang Lin, Zhuo Lv, Shuhan Zhou. Research on the Impact of Employee Stock Ownership Plans on the TFP of State-owned Enterprises[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(2): 347-355.
"
变量 | 变量定义 | 均值 | 中位数 | 标准差 | 最小值 | 最大值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LP | 基于LP法测算的企业TFP | 13.67 | 13.66 | 1.16 | 10.43 | 16.65 |
DID | 双重差分交乘项 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.22 | 0 | 1 |
Lev | 公司负债与公司总资产之比 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.19 | 0.08 | 0.89 |
Roa | 公司净利润与公司总资产之比 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.04 | -0.13 | 0.18 |
Growth | 公司本年营业收入增加额与上年营业收入之比 | 0.15 | 0.10 | 0.33 | -0.51 | 2.00 |
Age | 公司上市年限加1取对数 | 2.57 | 2.77 | 0.65 | 0 | 3.37 |
Ind | 公司独立董事人数与公司董事总人数之比 | 0.37 | 0.33 | 0.05 | 0.31 | 0.57 |
Dual | 公司董事长是否兼任总经理,是取1,否则取0 | 0.10 | 0 | 0.30 | 0 | 1 |
Top1 | 公司第一大股东持股比例 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.76 |
Cash | 公司货币资金与公司总资产之比 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 0.61 |
Board | 公司董事会人数的自然对数 | 2.20 | 2.20 | 0.19 | 1.61 | 2.71 |
"
变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
DID | 0.398*** (0.044) | 0.254*** (0.064) | 0.204*** (0.043) | 0.131** (0.062) |
Lev | 2.285*** (0.058) | 0.642*** (0.138) | 2.429*** (0.056) | 0.969*** (0.128) |
Roa | 18.990*** (0.295) | 15.358*** (0.433) | 19.474*** (0.300) | 15.782*** (0.419) |
Age | 0.351*** (0.015) | 0.725*** (0.037) | 0.281*** (0.015) | -0.004 (0.050) |
Growth | 0.031 (0.030) | 0.149** (0.022) | 0.071** (0.032) | 0.150*** (0.021) |
Ind | 0.020*** (0.002) | 0.004 (0.003) | 0.020*** (0.002) | 0.004 (0.003) |
Dual | 0.000 (0.032) | -0.009 (0.033) | -0.006 (0.029) | 0.009 (0.030) |
Top1 | 0.016*** (0.001) | 0.002 (0.002) | 0.016*** (0.001) | 0.002 (0.002) |
Cash | -0.167* (0.086) | 0.642*** (0.129) | -0.176** (0.078) | 0.419*** (0.119) |
Board | 0.552*** (0.055) | -0.026 (0.114) | 0.657*** (0.054) | 0.124 (0.099) |
常数项 | 8.286*** (0.173) | 10.545*** (0.389) | 7.719*** (0.171) | 11.453*** (0.342) |
Firm | No | Yes | No | Yes |
Year | No | No | Yes | Yes |
N | 8349 | 8349 | 8349 | 8349 |
R2_adj | 0.433 | 0.461 | 0.473 | 0.524 |
"
变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
低Mer | 高Mer | 低IE | 高IE | 低Eca | 高Eca | |
DID | 0.140 (0.099) | 0.186** (0.091) | 0.232** (0.107) | 0.147 (0.099) | 0.164** (0.081) | 0.116 (0.077) |
常数项 | 12.246*** (0.602) | 10.998*** (0.375) | 12.154*** (0.448) | 11.758*** (0.562) | 11.430*** (0.460) | 11.849*** (0.507) |
控制变量&Firm & Year | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 4190 | 4159 | 2438 | 2443 | 3931 | 3934 |
R2_adj | 0.508 | 0.498 | 0.581 | 0.476 | 0.547 | 0.508 |
"
变量 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
垄断性企业 | 竞争性企业 | 高混改程度 | 低混改程度 | 央企 | 地方国企 | |
DID | 0.064 (0.119) | 0.135* (0.073) | 0.086 (0.081) | 0.176** (0.078) | 0.361 (0.219) | 0.112* (0.061) |
常数项 | 11.492*** (0.576) | 11.452*** (0.381) | 11.312*** (0.374) | 11.844*** (0.560) | 10.522*** (0.496) | 11.583*** (0.368) |
控制变量&Year & Firm | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 2650 | 5699 | 4206 | 4143 | 2772 | 5577 |
R2_adj | 0.580 | 0.497 | 0.533 | 0.517 | 0.497 | 0.536 |
1 | 黄速建, 肖红军, 王欣. 论国有企业高质量发展[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(10): 19-41. |
Huang S J, Xiao H J, Wang X. Study on high-quality development of the state-owned enterprises[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(10): 19-41. | |
2 | 任广乾,罗新新,刘莉,等.混合所有制改革、控制权配置与国有企业创新投入[J].中国软科学,2022(2): 127-137. |
Ren G Q, Luo X X, Liu L, et al. Mixed ownership reform, control right allocation, and the innovation investment in state-owned enterprises[J]. Chinese Soft Science, 2022(2): 127-137. | |
3 | 刘晔, 张训常, 蓝晓燕. 国有企业混合所有制改革对全要素生产率的影响——基于PSM-DID方法的实证研究[J]. 财政研究, 2016(10): 63-75. |
Liu Y, Zhang X C, Lan X Y. The influence of the mixed ownership reform on the total factor productivity of the state owned enterprises: An empirical study based on PSM-DID method[J]. Public Finance Research, 2016(10): 63-75. | |
4 | 池国华, 郭芮佳, 王会金. 政府审计能促进内部控制制度的完善吗——基于中央企业控股上市公司的实证分析[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(1): 31-41. |
Chi G H, Guo R J, Wang H J. Can government audits improve the institution of internal control: An empirical analysis based on the listed companies of central enterprises holding[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2019, 22(1): 31-41. | |
5 | 褚剑, 方军雄, 秦璇. 政府审计能促进国有企业创新吗?[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2018, 33(6): 10-21. |
Chu J, Fang J X, Qin X. Can government auditing promote SOEs’ innovation?[J].Audit and Economic Research, 2018, 33(6): 10-21. | |
6 | 蔡昉. 中国经济增长如何转向全要素生产率驱动型[J]. 中国社会科学, 2013(1): 56-71+206. |
Cai F. How does China's economic growth shift towards total factor productivity driven growth[J]. Social Sciences in China, 2013(1): 56-71+206. | |
7 | 于瑶, 祁怀锦. 集团公司董事会建设与央企全要素生产率——一项准自然实验[J]. 经济管理, 2021, 43(10): 24-41. |
Yu Y, Qi H J. Board reform of holding group and total factor productivity of central state-owned enterprise: A quasi-natural experiment[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2021, 43(10): 24-41. | |
8 | 黄贤环, 王瑶. 国有企业限薪抑制了全要素生产率的提升吗[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2020, 22(1): 34-50. |
Huang X H, Wang Y. Does the state-owned enterprise salary limit suppress the promotion of total factor productivity?[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2020, 22(1): 34-50. | |
9 | 王靖宇, 张宏亮, 陈海涛. 业绩考核制度与中央企业全要素生产率——基于一项准自然实验的研究[J]. 经济学报, 2021, 8(4): 1-26. |
Wang J Y, Zhang H L, Chen H T. Performance appraisal system and total factor productivity of central enterprises: A quasi-natural experiment[J]. China Journal of Economics, 2021, 8(4): 1-26. | |
10 | 朱保, 马忠. 工资总额管制提升了中央企业的全要素生产率吗[J]. 当代财经, 2023(1): 132-145. |
Zhu B, Ma Z. Has the payroll control improved the total factor productivity of the state-owned central enterprises[J]. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 2023(1): 132-145. | |
11 | 曹春方, 张超. 产权权利束分割与国企创新——基于中央企业分红权激励改革的证据[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(9): 155-168. |
Cao C F, Zhang C. Partitioning of property rights and the innovation of state-owned enterprises: A quasi natural experiment of bonus incentives reform in central government-owned enterprises[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(9): 155-168. | |
12 | 曹越, 辛红霞, 孙丽. 国有企业实施员工持股计划能否提升内部控制质量?——基于“国企混改”背景[J]. 会计研究, 2022(11): 118-138. |
Cao Y, Xin H X, Sun L. Employee stock ownership plan and internal control quality in the “mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises”[J]. Accounting Research, 2022(11): 118-138. | |
13 | 刘青松, 肖星. 国有企业高管的晋升激励和薪酬激励——基于高管双重身份的视角[J]. 技术经济, 2015, 34(2): 93-100. |
Liu Q S, Xiao X. Promotion incentive and compensation incentive for executives of state-owned enterprises: Based on perspective of double identity[J]. Technology Economics, 2015, 34(2): 93-100. | |
14 | Kim E H, Ouimet P. Broad-based employee stock ownership: motives and outcomes[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2014, 69(3): 1273-1319. |
15 | 张琛, 陈彦彤, 田静. 民营企业所有权来源与路径依赖问题研究——基于混合所有制改革背景[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 1-12. |
Zhang C, Chen Y T, Tian J. Research on the source of ownership and path dependence of private enterprises: Based on the background of mixed-ownership reform[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 1-12. | |
16 | 孟庆斌, 李昕宇, 张鹏. 员工持股计划能够促进企业创新吗?——基于企业员工视角的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(11): 209-228. |
Meng Q B, Li X Y, Zhang P. Can employee stock ownership plans promote corporate innovation: Empirical evidence based on the perspective of enterprise employees[J]. Journal of Management World, 2019, 35(11): 209-228. | |
17 | Jensen M C, Meckling W H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976, 3(4): 305-360. |
18 | 陈其安,许媛,唐书香 .国有企业非国有股东经营决策参与权对公司绩效的影响研究[J].中国管理科学,2025, 33(2): 332-346. |
Chen Q A, Xu Y, Tang S X. Research on effect of non-state-owned shareholders’decision-making participation right on corporate performance in state-owned enterprises[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(2): 332-346. | |
19 | Holmstrom B. Agency costs and innovation[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1989,12(3): 305-327. |
20 | 李韵, 丁林峰. 员工持股计划、集体激励与企业创新[J]. 财经研究, 2020, 46(7): 35-48. |
Li Y, Ding L F. Employee stock ownership plan, collective incentives and enterprise innovation[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2020, 46(7): 35-48. | |
21 | 李姝, 金振, 谢雁翔. 员工持股计划对企业全要素生产率的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2022, 19(5): 758-767. |
Li S, Jin Z, Xie Y X. Research on the influence of employee stock ownership plan on enterprise total factor productivity[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2022, 19(5): 758-767. | |
22 | 陈其安, 张国宏, 赵旭. 混合所有制国有企业公益性职能和所有权结构对经营绩效的影响: 理论与实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(11):78-91. |
Chen Q A, Zhang G H, Zhao X. The impact of public welfare functions and ownership structure on operating performance in mixed-ownership SOEs: Theoretical and empirical research[J].Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(11):78-91. | |
23 | 张学志, 李灿权, 周梓洵. 员工持股计划、内部监督与企业违规[J]. 世界经济, 2022, 45(3): 185-211. |
Zhang X Z, Li C Q, Zhou Z X. Employee stock ownership plans, internal monitoring and corporate fraud[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2022, 45(3): 185-211. | |
24 | 王烨, 孙娅妮, 孙慧倩, 等. 员工持股计划如何提升内部控制有效性?——基于PSM的实证研究[J]. 审计与经济研究, 2021, 36(1): 14-25. |
Wang Y, Sun Y N, Sun H Q, et al. How can employee stock ownership plan improve the effectiveness of internal control: An empirical test based on PSM[J]. Journal of Audit & Economics, 2021, 36(1): 14-25. | |
25 | 赵晶, 李林鹏, 和雅娴. 群团改革对企业创新的影响[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(12): 152-163+189. |
Zhao J, Li L P, He Y X. The impact of group reform on enterprise innovation[J]. Journal of Management World, 2019, 35(12): 152-163+189. | |
26 | Richardson S. Over-investment of free cash flow [J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2006,11(1): 159-189. |
27 | 盖庆恩, 朱喜, 程名望, 等. 要素市场扭曲、垄断势力与全要素生产率[J].经济研究, 2015, 50(5): 61-75. |
Gai Q E, Zhu X, Cheng M W, et al. Distortion of factor markets, monopolistic forces, and total factor productivity[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015, 50(5): 61-75. | |
28 | 李晓庆, 李萌菡. 国企混改、高管薪酬激励与全要素生产率[J]. 技术经济, 2022, 41(9): 36-49. |
Li X Q, Li M H. Mixed reform of state-owned enterprises, executive compensation incentive and total factor productivity[J]. Journal of Technology Economics, 2022, 41(9): 36-49. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
|