[1] Coase R H. The problem of social cost[J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1960(3): 1-44. [2] Hahn R W. Market power and transferable property rights[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1984, 99(4): 753-765. [3] Westskog H. Market power in a system of tradeable CO2 quotas[J]. Energy Journal, 1996, 17(3): 85-103. [4] Egteren H V, Weber M. Marketable permits, market power, and cheating[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996, 30(2): 161-173. [5] Hagem C, Westskog H. The design of a dynamic tradeable quota system under market imperfections[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1998, 36(1): 89-107. [6] Misiolek W S, Elder H W. Exclusionary manipulation of markets for pollution rights[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1989, 16(2): 156-166. [7] Hintermann B. Market power, permit allocation and efficiency in emission permit markets[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 49(3): 327-349. [8] Tanaka M, Chen Y. Market power in emissions trading: strategically manipulating permit price through fringe firms[J]. Applied Energy, 2012, 96(8): 203-211. [9] Haita C. Endogenous market power in an emissions trading scheme with auctioning[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2014, 37: 253-278. [10] Amundsen E S, Bergman L. Green certificates and market power in the Nordic power market[J]. Energy Journal, 2010, 33(2): 101117. [11] Francisco A, Francisco J A. Auctioning versus grandfathering in cap-and-trade systems with market power and incomplete information[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2015, 62(4): 873-906. [12] Zhang Zhongxiang. Carbon emissions trading in China: The evolution from pilots to a nationwide scheme[J]. Climate Policy, 2015, 15(1): 104-126. [13] Jiang Minxing, Yang Dongxiao, Chen Ziyue, et al. Market power in auction and efficiency in emission permits allocation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 183(3): 576-584. [14] D’amato A, Valentini E, Zoli M. Tradable quotas taxation and market power[J]. Energy Economics, 2017, 63: 248252. [15] 黄帝, 陈剑, 周泓. 配额-交易机制下动态批量生产和减排投资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(4): 129137.Huang Di, Chen Jian, Zhou Hong. Optimal production and emissions reduction investment policies in a dynamic lot sizing model under cap-and-trade[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(4): 129-137. [16] 邓万江, 马士华, 关旭. 碳交易背景下存在顾客环保偏好的双企业竞争策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(12): 17-26.Deng Wanjiang, Ma Shihua, Guan Xu. Duopoly enterprises strategies for consumer environmental awareness under carbon-emission-trading mechanism[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(12): 17-26. [17] 蔡乌赶, 李广培. 碳交易框架下企业生态创新策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(12): 171-179.Cai Wugan, Li Guangpei. Research on enterprises eco-innovation strategy based on carbon trading system[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(12): 171-179. [18] 骆瑞玲, 范体军, 夏海洋. 碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11): 44-53.Luo Ruiling, Fan Tijun, Xia Haiyang. The game analysis of carbon reduction technology investment on supply chain under carbon cap-and-trade rules[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(11): 44-53. [19] 杨玉香, 吴增源, 黄祖庆. 考虑技术投资的供应链网络下可交易污染排放许可均衡问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(4): 74-82.Yang Yuxiang, Wu Zengyuan, Huang Zuqing. Marketable pollution permits equilibrium problem in supply chain network with technological investment[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(4): 74-82. [20] 刘名武, 万谧宇, 付红. 碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(1): 152-162.Liu Mingwu, Wan Miyu, Fu Hong. Low-carbon technology selection for supply chain under cap and trade mechanism with low-carbon preference[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(12): 171-179. [21] 王珊珊, 张李浩, 范体军. 基于碳减排技术的竞争供应链投资均衡策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 73-82.Wang Shanshan, Zhang Lihao, Fan Tijun. Equilibrium strategies of carbon reduction technology adoption in competitive supply chains[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(6): 73-82. [22] André F J, Arguedas C. Technology adoption in emission trading programs with market power[J]. Energy Journal, 2018, 39(1): 145-174. [23] Wang Xu, Zhang Xiaobing, Zhu Lei. Imperfect market, emissions trading scheme, and technology adoption: A case study of an energy-intensive sector[J]. Energy Economics, 2019, 81: 142-158. [24] Godby R. Market power in laboratory emission permit markets[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2002, 23(3): 279-318. [25] Dormady, N. C. Carbon auctions, energy markets and market power: an experimental analysis[J]. Energy Economics, 2014, 44: 468-482. [26] Hintermann B. Market power in emission permit markets: Theory and evidence from the eu-ets[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2015, 66(1): 1-24. [27] Frondel M, Horbach J, Rennings K. End-of-pipe or cleaner production? an empirical comparison of environmental innovation decisions across OECD countries[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2007, 16(8): 571-584. [28] Zeng Bingxin, Zhu Lei, Yao Xing. Policy choice for end-of-pipe abatement technology adoption under technological uncertainty[J]. Economic Modelling, 2020, 87: 121-130. [29] Reinganum J F. On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach[J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 1981, 48(3): 395-405. [30] Coria J. Taxes, permits, and the diffusion of a new technology[J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2009, 31(4): 249-271. [31] Montero J P. Permits, Standards, and Technology Innovation[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2002, 44(1): 23-44. [32] Sanin M E, Zanaj S. A note on clean technology adoption and its influence on tradeable emission permits prices[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2011, 48(4): 561-567. [33] Li Yuan, Zhu Lei. Cost of energy saving and CO2 emissions reduction in China’s iron and steel sector[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 130: 603-616.
|