主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

Chinese Journal of Management Science ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 38-47.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0773

• Articles • Previous Articles    

The Effect of Market Power in Carbon Market on Emission Abatement Technology Adoption

ZENG Bing-xin1, DING Qing-guo2, ZHU Lei2   

  1. 1. State Grid Energy Research Institute Co., Ltd, Beijing 102209, China;2. School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • Received:2019-05-29 Revised:2021-04-29 Published:2022-03-02
  • Contact: 朱磊(1983-),男(汉族),安徽合肥人,北京航空航天大学经济管理学院,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:能源投资评价与低碳政策研究,Email:leizhu@buaa.edu.cn. E-mail:leizhu@buaa.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71673019,72122002)

Abstract: With China already committing to peak carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060, green low carbon development has become an important theme in the longer term. In this context, the carbon market has become a crucial market-based tool to help achieve China’s climate goals and energy transition. The effect of market power in carbon emission trading market on the diffusion of a new low carbon emissions abatement technology when firms interact in imperfectly competitive output market is investigated. Based on the classical framework proposed by Reinganum, the extension is made by introducing heterogeneous firms to describe firms’ strategic behavior and a two-stage non-cooperative game model is developed. In the first stage, each firm need determine the optimal time to adopt the new emissions abatement technology, taking into account its benefits and costs, as well as its rival’s strategic behavior. The first stage is described as a simultaneous-move game. In the second stage, given the level of abatement technology, each firm makes its own optimal output and emission decisions based on the profit maximization principle. This second stage is described as a leader-follower game. With this framework, through theoretical analysis and numerical simulation, the results suggest that firms will delay to adopt the new emissions abatement technology in the presence of market power in carbon market. Moreover, it will induce much later technology diffusion when the output demand is smaller and less elastic. This implies that the technology diffusion in the weak elastic sector may have more barriers than in the strong elastic sector. More theoretical references are provided for the design and optimization of the carbon market to promote the diffusion of low carbon emission reduction technologies. The policymaker should pay more attention to the market structure of sector covered in the carbon market. Furthermore, the regulator can enhance the supervision for the key firms to cope with the side effects of market power.

Key words: carbon market; market power; technology adoption and diffusion; strategic behavior

CLC Number: