基于ESG框架的重大工程隧道洞渣综合利用优化研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.2134

Abstract

Abstract:

Under the background that sustainable development has become one of the major strategies of modernization， abiding by ESG principles has become one of the important conditions for the success of mega projects. The waste utilization of mega projects has significant social， environmental and project governance benefits， which is in line with ESG concept. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to explore the role of tunnel spoil utilization on ESG objectives of mega projects. Tunnel spoil has the characteristics of large quantity and various types， while the utilization of tunnel spoil has the characteristics of diversification and wide impact， which leads to the complexity of decision-making on the combination of spoil utilization methods. How to explore the combination with the highest ESG contribution from numerous combinations of tunnel spoil utilization methods is the research question to be addressed in this research.There are many constraints in the optimization of tunnel spoil utilization combination， and there are multiple objectives in ESG and economic aspects， leading to a multi-objective optimization problem. Therefore， multi-objective optimization methods are adopted in this research. After systematically sorting out the role of waste utilization on ESG objectives of mega projects and its internal mechanism， an ESG-oriented optimization framework of tunnel spoil utilization combination is proposed. The framework establishes a mapping relationship between the "combination of tunnel spoil utilization methods–environmental and social objectives–project governance objectives"， and transforms the optimization problem of tunnel spoil utilization combinations into a multi-objective optimization problem between the environmental and social objectives， project governance objectives and economic costs.Based on the developed multi-objective optimization model， an optimization method–improved adaptive NSGA-II （I-A-NSGA-II） is proposed by introducing fast non-dominated ordering， elite strategies， adaptive crossover and mutation and improved congestion distance computation. I-A-NSGA-II provides a reference for the decision-making of spoil utilization in mega projects. The utilization of tunnel spoil of a mega project is taken as a reference， and constructs simulation data as an arithmetic example to test the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method. The connotation of ESG in spoil utilization of engineering projects is defined and the application scenarios of ESG theory is expanded. Meanwhile， the research focus of tunnel spoil utilization is led from the evaluation of a single method or the comparison of multiple methods to the optimization of the combination of multiple methods， which enriches the decision-making research of spoil utilization in mega projects.

Key words: mega project, tunnel spoil, waste utilization, ESG, multi-objective optimization

CLC Number:

C935

Guobin Wu, Yaqing Sun, Yulong Li. Research on Optimization of Tunnel Spoil Comprehensive Utilization of Mega Project Based on ESG Framework[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(3): 174-185.

Figures/Tables 13

References 40

1	向鹏成，李佳. 跨区域重大工程项目脆弱性研究［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2016， 36（9）： 2383-2390.
	Xiang P C， Li J. Research on system vulnerability of interregional large-scale construction projects［J］. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice， 2016， 36（9）： 2383-2390.
2	Zhang C， Yang J， Xie Y， et al. Utilization of tunnel spoils as a lightweight filling material for the voids behind tunnel excavation contour ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2022， 372： 133559.
3	李玉龙，苏涵，吴国滨. 基于云模型的重大工程弃渣场环境风险评价［J］.土木工程与管理学报， 2023， 40（2）： 7-15.
	Li Y L， Su H， Wu G B. Environmental risk assessment of spoil ground in mega-project based on cloud model［J］. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management， 2023， 40（2）： 7-15.
4	刘光富，鲁圣鹏，李雪芹. 产业共生研究综述：废弃物资源化协同处理视角［J］. 管理评论， 2014， 26（5）： 149-160.
	Liu G F， Lu S P， Li X Q. Literature review on industrial symbiosis： The perspective from synergy operation of recycling ［J］. Management Review， 2014， 26（5）： 149-160.
5	林鸣. 建造世界一流超大型跨海通道工程——港珠澳大桥岛隧工程管理创新［J］. 管理世界， 2020， 36（12）： 202-212.
	Lin M. Building the world-class mega sea-crossing：Management innovation of hong kong-zhuhai-macao bridge island-tunnel project［J］.Journal of Management World， 2020， 36（12）： 202-212.
6	刘婷婷，张劼，胡鸣明. 建筑废弃物资源化环境效益分析：以重庆为例［J］. 中国环境科学， 2018， 38（10）： 3853-3867.
	Liu T T， Zhang J， Hu M M. Analysis on environmental benefits of construction and demolition waste recycling： A case study in Chongqing［J］. China Environmental Science， 2018， 38（10）： 3853-3867.
7	Tirkolaee E B， Goli A， Gütmen S， et al. A novel model for sustainable waste collection arc routing problem： Pareto-based algorithms［J］. Annals of Operations Research， 2023， 324（1）： 189-214.
8	Golzarpoor H， Gonzalez V， Shahbazpour M， et al. An input-output simulation model for assessing production and environmental waste in construction［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2017， 143： 1094-1104.
9	李小平，蔡东，郭春香，等. 多维视角下建筑废弃物减量化系统物流网络设计［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2019， 39（11）： 2842-2854.
	Li X P， Cai D， Guo C X， et al. Logistics network design for construction waste reduction systems based on multidimensional perspective ［J］. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice， 2019， 39（11）： 2842-2854.
10	席龙胜，赵辉. 企业ESG表现影响盈余持续性的作用机理和数据检验［J］.管理评论，2022，34（9）： 313-326.
	Xi L S， Zhao H. The influence mechanism and data test of enterprise ESG performance on earning sustainability ［J］. Management Review， 2022， 34（9）： 313-326.
11	Pujanova E， Dubovenko S， Olderogge N， et al. Drivers in the management of large projects and megaprojects： The challenges of 2021： uncertainties， digitalization and decarbonization［C］//Proceedings of World Congress of the International Project Management Association， St. Petersburg， Russia， September 21-23， 2021 ， Cham： Springer Nature Switzerland， 2023： 256-263.
12	Siew R Y J. Critical evaluation of environmental， social and governance disclosures of malaysian property and construction companies［J］. Construction Economics and Building， 2017， 17（2）： 81-91.
13	Lu W， Ye M， Flanagan R， et al. Corporate social responsibility disclosures in international construction business： Trends and prospects［J］. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management， 2016， 142（1）： 04015053.
14	李玉龙，韩岩坤，苏涵. 基于ESG理念的重大工程弃渣造地项目选址价值评价［J］. 工程管理学报， 2024， 38（1）： 106-111.
	Li Y L， Han Y K， Su H. Evaluation of the site selection value of land construction project through major construction spoil based on ESG concept［J］. Journal of Engineering Management， 2024， 38（1）： 106-111.
15	Xie L， Ju T， Han T， et al. A meta-network-based management framework for megaproject social responsibility behaviour in China［J］. Engineering， Construction and Architectural Management， 2023， 30（9）： 4415-4434.
16	高华，阴春晴. ESG理念如何赋能PPP绩效管理：现实困境与应对策略［J］. 建筑经济， 2022， 43（11）： 27-32.
	Gao H， Yin C Q. How ESG concepts empower PPP performance management： Realistic dilemmas and framework design［J］. Construction Economy， 2022， 43（11）： 27-32.
17	Lovrenčić Butković L， Tomšić D， Kaselj S. Collaborative strategic view in corporate social responsibility - construction industry case［J］. Business Systems Research Journal， 2021， 12（1）： 144-163.
18	郭卫社，王百泉，李沿宗，等. 盾构渣土无害化处理、资源化利用现状与展望［J］. 隧道建设（中英文）， 2020， 40（8）： 1101-1112.
	Guo W S， Wang B Q， Li Y Z， et al. Status quo and prospect of harmless disposal and reclamation of shield muck in China［J］. Tunnel Construction， 2020， 40（8）： 1101-1112.
19	Zhang F， Ju Y， Dong P， et al. A fuzzy evaluation and selection of construction and demolition waste utilization modes in Xi’an， China［J］. Waste Management & Research， 2020， 38（7）： 792-801.
20	Zhang F， Ju Y， Gonzalez E D R S， et al. Evaluation of construction and demolition waste utilization schemes under uncertain environment： A fuzzy heterogeneous multi-criteria decision-making approach ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2021， 313（7）： 127907.
21	Hou H， Zhang S， Guo D， et al. Synergetic benefits of pollution and carbon reduction from fly ash resource utilization—Based on the life cycle perspective ［J］. Science of the Total Environment， 2023， 903： 166197.
22	杨哲，陈思思，陈永妍. 社区医养结合服务参与主体行动逻辑及调适策略［J］. 中国管理科学， 2023， 31（4）： 218-227.
	Yang Z， Chen S S， Chen Y Y. The action logic and adjustment strategy of the participants in the community medical and nursing service［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2023， 31（4）： 218-227.
23	Lu J， Javeed S A， Latief R， et al. The moderating role of corporate social responsibility in the association of internal corporate governance and profitability： Evidence from pakistan［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health， 2021， 18（11）： 5830.
24	Sambasivan M， Bah S M， Jo-Ann H. Making the case for operating “Green”： Impact of environmental proactivity on multiple performance outcomes of Malaysian firms［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2013， 42： 69-82.
25	Li T T， Wang K， Sueyoshi T， et al. ESG： Research progress and future prospects［J］. Sustainability， 2021， 13（21）： 11663.
26	Flammer C， Hong B， Minor D. Corporate governance and the rise of integrating corporate social responsibility criteria in executive compensation： Effectiveness and implications for firm outcomes［J］. Strategic Management Journal， 2019， 40（7）： 1097-1122.
27	Kim Y， Park M S， Wier B. Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility？［J］. The Accounting Review， 2012， 87（3）： 761-796.
28	Marini P， Bellopede R. The use of tunnel muck as industrial raw material： Two case-studies［J］. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering，2013，46（2）： 397-404.
29	刘景矿，王幼松，张文剑，等. 基于系统动力学的建筑废弃物管理成本-收益分析：以广州市为例［J］. 系统工程理论与实践， 2014， 34（6）： 1480-1490.
	Liu J K， Wang Y S， Zhang W J， et al. Cost-benefit analysis of construction and demolition waste management based on system dynamics： A case study of Guangzhou［J］. Systems Engineering—Theory &Practice， 2014， 34（6）： 1480-1490.
30	胡骏翡，陈环月．碳交易机制下废弃物发电项目柔性投资决策研究［J］．中国管理科学， 2023， DOI： 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2029 .
	Hu Junfei， Chen Huanyue. Flexible investment decision of waste-to-energy projects under carbon trading mechanism［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2023， DOI： 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2029 .
31	余福茂，钟永光，沈祖志. 考虑政府引导激励的电子废弃物回收处理决策模型研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2014， 22（5）： 131-137.
	Yu F M， Zhong Y G， Shen Z Z. Decision model on e-waste collecting and recycling considering the leading of government’s premium mechanisms［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2014， 22（5）： 131-137.
32	何开伦，李伟，刘志学.工业园区废弃物物流系统发展激励机制研究［J］.管理评论，2016， 28（1）： 169-178.
	He K L， Li W， Liu Z X. Research on development incentive mechanism of industrial park waste logistics system［J］. Management Review， 2016， 28（1）： 169-178.
33	王勇，张杰，刘永，等. 基于资源共享和温度控制的生鲜商品多中心车辆路径优化问题［J］. 中国管理科学， 2022， 30（11）： 272-285.
	Wang Y， Zhang J， Liu Y， et al. Optimization of fresh goods multi-center vehicle routing problem based on resource sharing and temperature control［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2022，30（11）： 272-285.
34	Deb K， Pratap A， Agarwal S， et al. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm： NSGA-II［J］. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation， 2002， 6（2）： 182-197.
35	谷晓燕，陈亮，刘倩，等. 草畜平衡约束下带时间窗的放牧路径规划研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2023， 31（8）： 184-192.
	Gu X Y， Chen L， Liu Q， et al. Research on grazing path planning with time window under grass livestock balance constraints［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2023， 31（8）： 184-192.
36	浦徐进，李秀峰. 基于电商承诺送达机制的多目标低碳MDVRP优化研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2021， 29（8）： 57-66.
	Pu X J， Li X F. Multi-objective low carbon MDVRP optimization based on e-commerce commitment delivery mechanism［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021， 29（8）： 57-66.
37	马祖军，王一然. 考虑生鲜农产品“最先一公里”损耗的预冷站选址定客［J］. 中国管理科学， 2024， 32（2）： 315-323.
	Ma Z J， Wang Y R. Optimal location and capacity of pre-cooling facilities considering the first-mile loss of fresh agri-products［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2024， 32（2）： 315-323.
38	刘明，徐锡芬，曹杰. 数据驱动环境下考虑多重干扰情境的共享单车重置优化研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2023， 31（9）： 148-158.
	Liu M， Xu X F， Cao J. A data-driven optimization model for reallocating dock-less sharing bikes with considering multiple disruption scenarios［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2023， 31（9）： 148-158.
39	Chen Y， Li L， Shen Y， et al. Group decision-making framework for site selection of coastal nuclear power plants in a linguistic environment： A sustainability perspective［J］. International Journal of Green Energy， 2021， 18（11）： 1161-1172.
40	Jin Y， Branke H. Evolutionary optimization in uncertain environments： A survey［J］. IEEE Transactions On Evolutionary Computation， 2005， 9（3）： 303-317.

洞渣利用方式（j）	经济作用（千万元）		洞渣利用量（万方）
洞渣利用方式（j）	成本	收益	碎石	砂石	黏土	石块
路基填筑	0.02	0.028	0	10	10	0
混凝土骨料	0.50	0.30	17	25	0	0
植被复垦基质	0.02	0.012	0	0	20	0
……
站区造地	0.03	0.042	0	3	10	0
烧制砖	0.06	0.036	0	0	15	0
园林石料	0.2	0.12	0	0	0	1

序号	fitness₁₁	fitness₁₁	fitness₁	fitness₂	序号	fitness₁₁	fitness₁₁	fitness₁	fitness₂
1	1.0000	0.6504	0.7200	0.0000	13	1.0000	0.5132	0.6104	0.5425
2	1.0000	0.6487	0.7188	0.0839	14	1.0000	0.5115	0.6094	0.6260
3	1.0000	0.6239	0.6990	0.1185	15	1.0000	0.4867	0.5894	0.6606
4	1.0000	0.6053	0.6840	0.1481	16	1.0000	0.4663	0.5730	0.7740
5	1.0000	0.6035	0.6826	0.2319	17	0.4114	0.1996	0.2420	0.8086
6	1.0000	0.5945	0.6760	0.2463	18	0.4114	0.1732	0.2208	0.8230
7	1.0000	0.5928	0.6743	0.3300	19	0.4114	0.1699	0.2183	0.9062
8	1.0000	0.5680	0.6543	0.3650	20	0.1357	0.0435	0.0620	0.9170
9	1.0000	0.5494	0.6396	0.3943	21	0.0743	0.0310	0.0396	0.9220
10	1.0000	0.5477	0.6380	0.4780	22	0.0743	0.0297	0.0386	0.9270
11	1.0000	0.5229	0.6180	0.5127	23	0.0343	0.0086	0.0137	0.9810
12	1.0000	0.5222	0.6177	0.5273	24	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	1.0000

算法	种群规模	迭代次数	交叉率	变异率
NSGA-II	20	根据本代和五代前的种群超体积变化率进行确定	1	0.4
I-A-NSGA-II	20	根据本代和五代前的种群超体积变化率进行确定	根据适应度更新

NSGA-II					I-A- NSGA-II
循环次数	迭代次数	多样性	拥挤度	帕累托面积	循环次数	迭代次数	多样性	拥挤度	帕累托面积
1	17	1.212	0.054	0.469	1	16	1.195	0.112	0.380
2	16	1.231	0.043	0.492	2	9	1.183	0.169	0.362
3	25	1.232	0.035	0.518	3	33	1.232	0.042	0.518
4	23	1.232	0.040	0.518	4	18	1.205	0.074	0.450
5	20	1.232	0.035	0.518	5	15	1.200	0.095	0.441
6	20	1.231	0.050	0.491	6	16	1.190	0.081	0.408
7	22	1.232	0.037	0.518	7	21	1.206	0.098	0.441
8	18	1.232	0.067	0.518	8	18	1.212	0.086	0.467
9	19	1.232	0.037	0.505	9	24	1.213	0.045	0.466
10	12	1.211	0.080	0.432	10	14	1.183	0.119	0.384
最优值	12	1.232	0.080	0.518	最优值	9	1.232	0.169	0.518
平均值	19.2	1.228	0.048	0.498	平均值	18.4	1.202	0.092	0.432
标准差	3.544	0.008	0.015	0.027	标准差	6.184	0.014	0.035	0.046

[1]	Ying Yu, Hecheng Wu, Ronghua Yi. Corporate ESG Performance and Value Creation: Based on the Perspective of Internal Development and External Pressure [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(3): 107-117.
[2]	Yongbo Xiao, Cui Zhao, Qungeng Lin, Jihong Zhang. Supply Chain Management Based on Product Innovation: Literature Review and Prospects [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(1): 297-310.
[3]	Tieke Li,Yixuan Su,Wenxin Zhang,Bailin Wang. Interval Multi-objective Optimal Scheduling for Steelmaking-continuous Casting with Processing Time Uncertainty [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 95-106.
[4]	Fuyu Wang,Haoxuan Xie,Zhonggao Lin,Jun Wang. Multi-objective Optimization Model and Adaptive Quantum Ant Colony Algorithm for Emergency Evacuation of High-speed Railway Stations under Emergencies [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(3): 188-197.
[5]	Hui Li,Xi Wang,Zhiya Zuo. Multi-objective Integrated Optimization of Flexible Resource Allocation and Scheduling in the Aerospace Production Workshop [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(10): 146-155.
[6]	Hai-yu WANG. Economic-statistical Optimization Design of Dynamic $n p x$ Control Chart Based on Simply Inspection [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 205-213.
[7]	Ming LIU, Xi-fen XU, Jie CAO. A Data-driven Optimization Model for Reallocating Dock-less Sharing Bikes with Considering Multiple Disruption Scenarios [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 148-158.
[8]	HU Xue-jun, ZHAO Yan, SHAN Mi-yuan, WANG Jian-jiang, BIE Li. An Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search Metaheuristic for Robust Multi-project Scheduling [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(9): 217-231.
[9]	HU Yu-zhen, LI Qian-qian, JIANG Shan. Multi-Objective Optimization of Overseas Warehouse Location for Cross-border E-commerce Enterprises [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(7): 201-209.
[10]	ZHU Jian-bo, SHI Qian-qian, ZHANG Jin-wen, SHENG Zhao-han. An Incentive Model in Risk Management of Mega Project Considering Insurance Company Involved [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 1-10.
[11]	NIU Ben, , GUO Chen, TANG Heng. Multi-objective Multi-learning Bacterial Foraging Optimization Algorithm for Mixed Data Clustering [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(12): 131-140.
[12]	XU Xiao-feng, LIN Zi-ru, ZHOU Peng. Research on Vehicle Routing Problem of Multiple Oil Depot Passive Distribution under Multi Oil Supply Constraints [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(5): 157-165.
[13]	PENG Wu-liang, MA Xiao-jing. A Bi-objective Optimization Method for Tactical Project Planning [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 69-77.
[14]	DONG Xue-fan, LIU Yi-jun, LIAN Ying. Entropy-Controlled Principle based Multi-objective Industrial Structure Optimization Model in the Tertiary Industry:A Case Study of Beijing [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(9): 53-62.
[15]	SHI Qian-qian, ZHU Jian-bo, SHENG Zhao-han. Study on Profit Distribution of Collaboration in Mega Project Supply Chain [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(5): 42-51.

Research on Optimization of Tunnel Spoil Comprehensive Utilization of Mega Project Based on ESG Framework

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 40

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0