主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 119-129.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1026

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

成本分担契约下绿色供应链的环境标签策略选择研究

曹裕1, 胡韩莉2, 李青松3   

  1. 1.中南大学商学院,湖南 长沙410083; 2.长沙理工大学经济与管理学院,湖南 长沙410114;3.中南林业科技大学物流与交通学院,湖南 长沙410004
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-12 修回日期:2020-04-04 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 胡韩莉(1989-),女(汉族),湖南岳阳人,长沙理工大学经济与管理学院,讲师,博士,研究方向:绿色供应链管理,Email:hanxi8991@sina.com. E-mail:hanxi8991@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71972182);湖南省杰出青年科学基金资助项目(2020JJ2051);湖南省社会科学基金资助青年项目(19YBQ002);湖南省教育厅优秀青年基金资助项目(19B041, 20B607)

Environmental Labeling Strategy Selection of Green Supply Chain Under Cost Sharing Contract

CAO Yu1, HU Han-li2, LI Qing-song3   

  1. 1. School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China; 2. School of Economics &Management, Changsha University of Science &Technology, Changsha 410114, China; 3. School of Logistics and Transportation, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
  • Received:2019-07-12 Revised:2020-04-04 Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-10-12
  • Contact: 胡韩莉 E-mail:hanxi8991@sina.com

摘要: 考虑自贴与认证两种环境标签策略,研究由一个制造商与一个零售商构成的绿色供应链的环境标签策略选择问题,并进一步分析成本分担契约对绿色供应链决策的影响。研究表明,当消费者绿色意识或信任度提高时,制造商与零售商的绿色努力水平均会提升,但消费者绿色意识的增强对制造商并不是总是有利的,认证标签策略下制造商的利润会随消费者绿色意识的增加而下降;从标签选择来看,制造商总会倾向于选择自贴标签策略,尤其在制造商成本分担契约下可获得最高利润,但零售商在认证标签下的利润反而更高;从契约协调的效率来看,成本分担契约可以提高供应链的绿色努力水平,促使制造商利润与整个社会福利的增加,但对零售商的利润并不一定有利,尤其在认证标签策略下,成本分担契约将会失效,而在自贴标签策略下,零售商成本分担契约可以实现对供应链的协调;从社会总福利来看,只有在消费者环境意识、信任度以及认证成本均较高时,自贴标签策略下的社会福利会高于认证标签策略,否则认证标签策略会更优。

关键词: 绿色供应链;自贴标签;认证标签;成本分担契约

Abstract: Environmental labeling is an important way to help companies declare the green quality level of their products. The self-posting and certification environmental labeling strategies are considered, the environmental labeling strategies selection of a green supply chain consisting of one manufacturer and one retailer is studied, and further the impact of cost-sharing contracts on green supply chain decisions is analyzed. Research shows that when consumers’ green awareness or trust increases, the green effort level of manufacturers and retailers will increase, but the increase in consumer green awareness is not always beneficial to manufacturers. Under the certification label strategy, the manufacturer’s profit will decrease with the increase of consumers' green awareness. From the label selection, the manufacturer will always choose self-labeling strategies, especially under the manufacturer’s cost-sharing contract, the highest profit will be obtained, but the retailer’s profit under the certification label is higher. Comparing the efficiency of contracts, all cost-sharing contracts can increase the level of green efforts in the supply chain and promote the increase of the manufacturer’s profits and overall social benefits, but they are not necessarily beneficial to the retailer’s profits. Especially in the certification labeling strategy, the cost-sharing contract will be invalidated, and under the self-labeling strategy, the retailer’s cost-sharing contract can achieve coordination of the supply chain. From the perspective of total social welfare, only when consumers’ environmental awareness, trust, and certification cost are high, the social welfare under the self-labeling strategy will be higher than the certification label strategy, otherwise certificate label strategy will be better.

Key words: green supply chain; self-labeling; certification label; cost sharing contract

中图分类号: