具有不同类型信息的风险投资商与投资企业多指标双边匹配决策方法

Abstract

Abstract: According to the character of two-sided matching problem between venture capitalists and investment enterprises in real-life, the two-sided matching model between venture capitalists and investment enterprises with multiple attributes and different kinds of information is constructed and a corresponding decision method is proposed. Due to the uncertainty of market environment and complexity of objective things, real numbers, intervals, triangular fuzzy numbers, linguistic variables and intuitionistic fuzzy numbers are used to represent the evaluation information. Taking the expectation levels as the reference points, the gain or loss relative to the reference points for each attribute value is computed according to prospect theory. Considering the loss aversion trait of the decision maker's psychological behavior, the comprehensively perceived values of venture capitalists and investment enterprises are calculated by using TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of Interactive and Multicriteria Decision Making) method.The multi-objective optimization model which maximizes the comprehensively perceived values of venture capitalists and investment enterprises and the income of investment intermediary is established. The maxmin method is proposed to solve this model and then the matching results can be obtained. The example analysis shows the effectiveness and reasonability of the method.

Key words: two-sided matching, psychological behavior, prospect theory, TODIM method, multi-objective decision making

CLC Number:

C934

WAN Shu-ping, LI Deng-feng. Decision Making Method for Multi-attribute Two-Sided Matching Problem between Venture Capitalists and Investment Enterprises with Different Kinds of Information[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(2): 40-47.

References

[1] 陈希, 樊治平. 基于公理设计的风险投资商与风险企业双边匹配[J]. 系统工程, 2010, 28(6): 70-75.
[2] Gale D, Shapley L. College admissions and the stability of marriage[J]. American Mathematical Monthly, 1962, 69(1): 9-15.
[3] Janssen M, Verbraeck A. Comparing the strengths and weaknesses of Internet-based matching mechanisms for the transport market[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2008, 44(3): 475-490.
[4] Sarne D, Kraus S. Managing parallel inquiries in agents' two-sided search[J]. Artificial Intelligence, 2008, 172 (4-5): 541-569.
[5] Lin H T. A job placement intervention using fuzzy approach for two-way choice[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009, 36(2): 2543-2553.
[6] Huang Denghui, Chiu H N, Yeh R H, et al. A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making approach for solving a bi-objective personnel assignment problem[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56(1): 1-10.
[7] 陈希, 樊治平, 李玉花. IT服务供需双边匹配的模糊多目标决策方法[J]. 管理学报, 2011, 8(7): 1097-1011.
[8] 蒋忠中, 袁媛, 樊治平. 电子中介中具有数量折扣的多属性商品交易匹配问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(6): 122-130.
[9] Sárensen M. How smart is smart money? A two-sided matching model of venture capital[J]. Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(6): 2725-2762.
[10] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[11] Tversky A, Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4): 297-323.
[12] Schmidt U, Zank H. A simple model of cumulative prospect theory[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2009, 45(3): 308-319.
[13] Gomes L F A M, Lima M M P P. TODIM: Basic and application to multi-criteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts[J]. Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, 1992, 16(4): 113-127.
[14] Gomes L F A M, Rangel L A D. An application of the TODIM method to the multicriteria rental evaluation of residential properties[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 193(1): 204-211.
[15] Li Dengfeng, Huang Zhigong, Chen Guohong. A systematic approach to heterogeneous multiattribute group decision making[J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2010, 59(4): 561-572.
[16] 徐泽水, 达庆利. 区间数排序的可能度法及其应用[J]. 系统工程学报, 2003, 18(1): 67-70.
[17] 徐泽水. 对方案有偏好的三角模糊数型多属性决策方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2002, 24(8): 9-13.
[18] Hong D H, Choi C H. Multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2000, 114: 103-113.
[19] Wan S P, Li D F. Fuzzy LINMAP approach to beterogeneous MADM considering the comparisons of alternatives with hesitation degress[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(6):925-940.
[20] 李登峰. 模糊多目标多人决策与对策[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2003.

Decision Making Method for Multi-attribute Two-Sided Matching Problem between Venture Capitalists and Investment Enterprises with Different Kinds of Information

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	GU Jing, ZENG Lu-xuan, LI Wen-xin, XU Ze-shui. A Class of Sequential Decision Making Methods: Lens and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Perspective [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1): 24-35.
[2]	GAO Ruo-lan, ZHOU Yi-ning, LIU Ji-cai. Adverse Selection of Investors in PPP Projects Based on Prospect Theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1): 36-46.
[3]	WANG Zhi-ying, LI Yong-jian, LIU Xiao-di. Decision-making Method in Response to Public Opinion Crisis Considering the Satisfaction of the Public under Multiple Inducing Information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1): 207-216.
[4]	JIN Shuai, GU Min, SHENG Zhao-han, YUAN Yu-feng. Firm's Production Decision under Emission Permits Price Uncertainty [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(4): 109-121.
[5]	WANG Zhi-ying, NIE Hui-fang, YANG Xue-liang. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Sudden Panic Buying Events Considering the Perceived Value of the Public [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(3): 71-79.
[6]	LIU Pei-de, TENG Fei. Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Method Based on Evidential Reasoning and Generalized Shapley for Extended Probabilistic Linguistic Term Set [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(11): 206-218.
[7]	YANG Jian, FANG Yi-xin, DU Shao-fu. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Cooperative Innovation Based on Reference Dependence [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(1): 191-200.
[8]	HAN Jing, CAI Xun, TENG Xin-yu. The Evolutionary Analysis of the Influence of Value and Risk Perception on Cash Back for Favorable Comment [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(9): 205-216.
[9]	CHEN Wen-bo, CHEN Lang-nan, WANG Shen-quan. Investors' Gambling Behavior——A Perspective from Profit/Loss Condition and Investor Sentiment [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(2): 19-30.
[10]	LIU Dong-hai, LIU Yuan-yuan, CHEN Xiao-hong. Study on Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on Mean-Standard Deviation Preference Distance Measure Using Hesitant Intuitionistic Fuzzy Linguisticterm Sets [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(1): 174-183.
[11]	YU Gao-feng, LI Deng-feng, WU Jian, YE Yin-fang. Heterogeneous Multi-attribute Variable Weight Decision Making Method Considering Decision Maker's Loss Aversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(9): 141-147.
[12]	XU Hai-jun, TIAN Xiao-li, XU Ze-shui. Prospect Decision-making Method Based on Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(8): 179-185.
[13]	REN Lei, REN Ming-lun. Dynamic Two-sided Matching Method of Cloud Manufacturing Task based on Learning and Synergy Effect [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(7): 63-70.
[14]	WANG Jia, JIN Xiu, WANG Xu, LI Gang. Research on Cross Market Regime Switching Multi-period Asset Allocation Based on Prospect Theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(12): 44-55.
[15]	MA De-qing, HU Jin-song, JIANG Wei, CHEN Liang. Newsboy Problem with Probabilistic Loss Aversion and Loss Aversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(9): 188-196.