三端点区间数互反判断矩阵的排序方法研究

Abstract

Abstract: The consistency and the priority method of three-point interval number Reciproca judgment matrix are studied. Based on the definition of three-point interval number reciproca judgment matrix, the relations between the consistency and the the weight vector for three-point interval number reciproca judgment matrix discussed.Then, a linear programming model is established,and the weight vector of three-point interval number reciproca judgment matrix is obtained. By using the expectations of three-point interval number reciproca judgment matrix, the decision alternatives are ranked. Finally, some numerical examples illustrate the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed methods.

Key words: multi-attribute decision, three-point interval number, reciproca judgment matrix, priority

CLC Number:

C934
O223

ZHANG Na, ZHU Jian-jun. Research on the Priority Method of Three-point Interval Number Reciproca Judgment Matrix[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, (2): 152-158.

References

[1] Saaty,T..The Analytic Hierarchy Process[M].NewYork:McGraw-Hill,1980.
[2] Wang, Y.M.,Yang, J. B.,Yang, D.L..Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices[J].Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2005,167:252-273.
[3] 樊治平, 尤天慧, 张尧.属性权重信息不完全的区间数多属性决策方法[J].东北大学学报, 自然科学版,2005,26(8):798-800.
[4] Chuu, H.J..Group decision making model using fuzzy multiple attributes analysis for the evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2010,160(5): 586-602.
[5] Merig, J.M..Fuzzy decision making with immediate probabilities[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering,2010,58(4): 651-657.
[6] Hughes,W.R..A statistical framework for strategic decision making with AHP: Probability assessment and Bayesian revision[J].Omega, 2010,37(2):463-470.
[7] Truchon, M., Gordon, S..Statistical comparison of aggregation rules for votes[J]. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2010,57(2):199-212.
[8] 朱建军,王梦光,刘士新.一种新型不确定AHP的研究与应用[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(5):15-20.
[9] 刘思峰,党耀国,方志耕等.灰色系统理论方法与应用(第三版)[M].科学出版社,2007.
[10] 朱建军,刘思峰,王翯华.群决策中两类三端点区间数判断矩阵的集结方法[J].自动化学报,2007,33(3):297-301.
[11] 田飞,朱建军,姚冬蓓,朱红燕.三端点区间数互补判断矩阵的一致性及权重[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,10 :108-113.
[12] 朱建军,刘思峰,田飞.群决策中三端点语言和互补偏好信息的转化及集结研究[J].中国管理科学,2011,19(3) :141-147.
[13] 朱建军,陈立光,刘思峰.用于原纸规格精简决策的三端点区间数层次分析法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(10):148-153.
[14] 罗党.三参数区间灰数信息下的决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(1):124-130.
[15] 兰蓉,范九伦.三参数区间值模糊集上的TOPSIS决策方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(5):129-136.
[16] 汪新凡.三参数区间数据信息集成算子及其在决策中的应用[J].系统工程与电子技术,2008,30(8):1468-1473.
[17] 魏翠萍,张玉忠,冯向前.区间数判断矩阵的一致性检验及排序方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,10:132-139.

Research on the Priority Method of Three-point Interval Number Reciproca Judgment Matrix

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Cited

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	REN Rong-rong, MENG Yi-ming, LI Xiao-qi, ZHAO Meng. Consensus Measure Method for Probabilistic Linguistic Information in Multi-attribute Group Decision Making [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(4): 220-230.
[2]	ZHANG Jian. Research on the Model of Supplier Selection with HTFWGBM Operator [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3): 137-143.
[3]	PAN Ya-hong, GENG Xiu-li. Hybrid Multiple Attribute Decision Making Approach based on Mo-RVIKOR [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(12): 143-151.
[4]	LI Xiao-peng, LI Cun-bin, PAN Nan-sheng. A Schedule Generation Scheme Based on Breadth Search of Graph [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(9): 119-128.
[5]	YU Gao-feng, LI Deng-feng, WU Jian, YE Yin-fang. Heterogeneous Multi-attribute Variable Weight Decision Making Method Considering Decision Maker's Loss Aversion [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(9): 141-147.
[6]	ZHOU Wei-jie, ZHANG Hong-ru, DANG Yao-guo, WANG Zheng-xin. New Information Priority Accumulated Grey Discrete Model and Its Application [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(8): 140-148.
[7]	LIANG Yan-hua, GUO Peng, ZHU Yu-ming. A Sample-Set based Interval Gray Target Classification and Decision-Making Model and Its Applications [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(5): 98-103.
[8]	LIANG Chang-yong, GU Dong-xiao, CHENG Wen-juan, YANG Chang-hui, GU Zuo-zuo. A Decision Knowledge Discovery Method for Multi-attribute Cases with Non-continuous Features [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(4): 83-91.
[9]	ZHANG Xiao-zhi, ZHU Chuan-xi, ZHU Li. Generalized Precedence Ordering Method with Ranking Preference for Time Series-based Multi-attribute Decision Making [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(4): 105-111.
[10]	WAN Shu-ping, DONG Jiu-ying. Multi-attribute Decision Making based on Triangular Intuitionistic Fuzzy Number Choquet Integral Operator [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(3): 121-129.
[11]	HU Ming-li, ZHANG Cai-fen, ZHU Jian-jun. Research on a Aggregated Model of Double Uncertain Information based on Bayesian Network [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(2): 135-141.
[12]	GONG Yan-bing. Fuzzy C-OWG Operator and Its Application of Priority in Triangular Fuzzy Number Reciprocal Judgment Matrix [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2011, 19(3): 118-122.
[13]	AI Shi-zhong, DU Rong, ZHANG Wei-li, Cathal M. Brugha. A Nomology-Based Group-Decision Making Methodology and Its Application [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2011, 19(1): 177-184.
[14]	LUO Gong-zhi, YANG Xiao-jiang, LIU Si-feng. Rough Analysis Model of Multi-attribute Decision Making Based on Limited Dominance Relation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(5): 127-132.
[15]	LIU Shu-lin, WANG Ming-xi. Multi-Attribute Procurement Auction Theory and Application： A Review with Comments [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(1): 183-192.