Chinese Journal of Management Science ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 268-278.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1432
Previous Articles Next Articles
Feng LI1(),Yue WANG1,Liang LIANG2,Gang KOU1
Received:
2021-07-21
Revised:
2021-11-29
Online:
2023-11-15
Published:
2023-11-20
Contact:
Feng LI
E-mail:lifeng1990@swufe.edu.cn
CLC Number:
Feng LI,Yue WANG,Liang LIANG,Gang KOU. A Two-stage Data Envelopment Analysis Approach for Evaluating Decision-making Units with Fixed-sum Shared Outputs[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(11): 268-278.
"
变量 | MIEC | MIFI | EP | SEC | SFI | LF | GDP | CO2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 中位数 标准差 最大值 最小值 | 628.52 | 320.26 | 11619.55 | 13169.97 | 23638.66 | 1434.83 | 32787.84 | 369.52 |
496.89 | 320.26 | 5303.65 | 10384.65 | 22928.83 | 1184.21 | 24909.45 | 297.71 | |
516.63 | 217.32 | 19566.69 | 9721.91 | 16502.47 | 1098.97 | 25341.36 | 281.78 | |
2046.34 | 921.40 | 78682.27 | 37938.72 | 59046.30 | 5008.20 | 107671.07 | 1104.54 | |
24.63 | 0.90 | 1125.97 | 1351.45 | 2736.26 | 148.66 | 2965.95 | 35.12 |
"
地区 | ||
---|---|---|
北京 | 538.18 | 517.21 |
天津 | 510.01 | 314.68 |
河北 | -615.68 | 0.00 |
山西 | -616.06 | 0.00 |
内蒙古 | -517.38 | 0.00 |
辽宁 | 150.65 | 0.00 |
吉林 | -363.19 | 0.00 |
黑龙江 | 38.82 | 0.00 |
上海 | 479.46 | 0.00 |
江苏 | 257.86 | 247.82 |
浙江 | 0.00 | -116.41 |
安徽 | -232.29 | 0.00 |
福建 | -301.53 | 0.00 |
江西 | -179.56 | 0.00 |
山东 | -1348.71 | 0.00 |
河南 | 15.57 | 0.00 |
湖北 | 0.00 | -299.43 |
湖南 | 423.22 | 139.88 |
广东 | -16.12 | 0.00 |
广西 | 0.00 | -317.73 |
海南 | 447.05 | 0.00 |
重庆 | 0.00 | -318.34 |
四川 | 421.61 | 427.62 |
贵州 | -232.82 | 0.00 |
云南 | 31.48 | 0.00 |
陕西 | -70.25 | 0.00 |
甘肃 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
青海 | 393.90 | 0.00 |
宁夏 | 229.95 | 0.00 |
新疆 | -39.47 | 0.00 |
调整和 | -595.30 | 595.30 |
"
地区 | 排序 | 排序 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
北京 | 1.0000 | 1 | 6.3869 | 2 |
天津 | 1.0000 | 1 | 1.6095 | 5 |
河北 | 0.6947 | 22 | 0.6724 | 27 |
山西 | 0.7874 | 14 | 0.7342 | 22 |
内蒙古 | 0.7634 | 16 | 0.7057 | 26 |
辽宁 | 0.8659 | 12 | 0.8692 | 13 |
吉林 | 0.4938 | 30 | 0.5859 | 30 |
黑龙江 | 0.6576 | 23 | 0.6634 | 28 |
上海 | 1.0000 | 1 | 6.8558 | 1 |
江苏 | 1.0000 | 1 | 1.4162 | 6 |
浙江 | 0.8361 | 13 | 0.9255 | 11 |
安徽 | 0.7338 | 20 | 0.7295 | 25 |
福建 | 0.7152 | 21 | 0.8478 | 15 |
江西 | 0.6278 | 26 | 0.7831 | 18 |
山东 | 0.7851 | 15 | 0.7371 | 21 |
河南 | 0.9024 | 11 | 0.8751 | 12 |
湖北 | 0.7475 | 17 | 0.8006 | 17 |
湖南 | 0.9768 | 10 | 0.9712 | 10 |
广东 | 1.0000 | 1 | 1.0000 | 8 |
广西 | 0.5636 | 28 | 0.7339 | 23 |
海南 | 1.0000 | 1 | 4.4383 | 3 |
重庆 | 0.5857 | 27 | 0.8620 | 14 |
四川 | 1.0000 | 1 | 1.0859 | 7 |
贵州 | 0.5421 | 29 | 0.6149 | 29 |
云南 | 0.6527 | 24 | 0.8186 | 16 |
陕西 | 0.7350 | 19 | 0.7305 | 24 |
甘肃 | 0.6286 | 25 | 0.7638 | 19 |
青海 | 1.0000 | 1 | 3.0282 | 4 |
宁夏 | 1.0000 | 1 | 0.9912 | 9 |
新疆 | 0.7454 | 18 | 0.7449 | 20 |
均值 | 0.8013 | 2.7494 |
"
地区 | 排序 | 排序 | 排序 | 排序 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
北京 | 9.2406 | 2 | 5.3976 | 2 | 6.3856 | 2 | 7.3111 | 3 |
天津 | 1.3722 | 6 | 0.9044 | 8 | 1.6096 | 5 | 1.8845 | 6 |
河北 | 0.8152 | 23 | 0.6925 | 24 | 0.6724 | 27 | 0.7119 | 28 |
山西 | 1.0000 | 8 | 0.7874 | 12 | 0.7341 | 22 | 0.7895 | 21 |
内蒙古 | 1.0000 | 8 | 0.7634 | 16 | 0.7056 | 26 | 0.7683 | 22 |
辽宁 | 0.9409 | 14 | 0.7762 | 15 | 0.8692 | 13 | 0.8880 | 16 |
吉林 | 0.7083 | 30 | 0.5143 | 30 | 0.5858 | 30 | 0.6935 | 29 |
黑龙江 | 0.8028 | 24 | 0.6544 | 26 | 0.6634 | 28 | 0.6533 | 30 |
上海 | 10.8254 | 1 | 6.8540 | 1 | 46.3234 | 1 | 54.5399 | 1 |
江苏 | 2.3905 | 5 | 1.7338 | 5 | 1.4158 | 6 | 2.3644 | 5 |
浙江 | 0.9035 | 17 | 0.8795 | 10 | 0.9255 | 11 | 0.9435 | 12 |
安徽 | 0.8389 | 22 | 0.7114 | 22 | 0.7294 | 25 | 0.7562 | 23 |
福建 | 0.7918 | 26 | 0.7770 | 14 | 0.8478 | 15 | 0.9015 | 15 |
江西 | 0.7799 | 27 | 0.5717 | 29 | 0.7831 | 18 | 0.8131 | 19 |
山东 | 1.0000 | 8 | 0.7850 | 13 | 0.7370 | 21 | 0.7961 | 20 |
河南 | 0.8431 | 21 | 0.8368 | 11 | 0.8751 | 12 | 0.9367 | 14 |
湖北 | 0.9002 | 19 | 0.7298 | 20 | 0.8005 | 17 | 0.8759 | 18 |
湖南 | 0.9016 | 18 | 0.9000 | 9 | 0.9712 | 10 | 1.0189 | 8 |
广东 | 1.0000 | 8 | 1.0000 | 6 | 1.0000 | 8 | 1.0000 | 9 |
广西 | 0.7639 | 29 | 0.6020 | 27 | 0.7339 | 23 | 0.7355 | 27 |
海南 | 7.5672 | 3 | 5.1608 | 3 | 4.4369 | 3 | 7.5672 | 2 |
重庆 | 1.0000 | 8 | 0.6720 | 25 | 0.8619 | 14 | 0.9943 | 11 |
四川 | 1.0025 | 7 | 0.9182 | 7 | 1.0859 | 7 | 1.2615 | 7 |
贵州 | 0.7755 | 28 | 0.5943 | 28 | 0.6149 | 29 | 0.7468 | 24 |
云南 | 0.9085 | 16 | 0.7051 | 23 | 0.8186 | 16 | 0.8783 | 17 |
陕西 | 1.0000 | 8 | 0.7350 | 19 | 0.7304 | 24 | 0.7388 | 26 |
甘肃 | 0.9384 | 15 | 0.7164 | 21 | 0.7638 | 19 | 0.9384 | 13 |
青海 | 3.6421 | 4 | 2.6946 | 4 | 3.0279 | 4 | 3.6421 | 4 |
宁夏 | 0.7922 | 25 | 0.7569 | 17 | 0.9913 | 9 | 1.0000 | 9 |
新疆 | 0.8525 | 20 | 0.7454 | 18 | 0.7448 | 20 | 0.7455 | 25 |
均值 | 1.8766 | 1.3523 | 2.7482 | 3.2632 |
1 | 安庆贤,陈晓红,余亚飞,等.基于DEA的两阶段系统中间产品公平设定研究[J].管理科学学报, 2017, 20(1): 32-40. |
An Qingxian, Chen Xiaohong, Yu Yafei, et al. Fair setting for intermediate products in two-stage system based on DEA[J]. Journal of Management Science in China, 2017, 20(1): 32-40. | |
2 | 冯晨鹏,王慧玲,毕功兵.存在多种非期望产出的非径向零和收益DEA模型我国区域环境[J].中国管理科学, 2017, 25(10): 42-51. |
Feng Chenpeng, Wang Huiling, Bi Gongbing. Non-radial ZSG-DEA model with multiple undesirable outputs: an empirical study for regional environmental efficiencies in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(10): 42-51. | |
3 | 王美强,李勇军.具有双重角色和非期望要素的供应商评价两阶段DEA模型[J].中国管理科学, 2016, 24(12): 91-97. |
Wang Meiqiang, Li Yongjun. A two-stage DEA model for evaluation of supplier with dual-role and undesirable output factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(12): 91-97. | |
4 | Lins M P E, Gomes E G, de Mello J C C S, et al. Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 148(2): 312-322. |
5 | Gomes E G, Lins M P E. Modelling undesirable outputs with zero sum gains data envelopment analysis models[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2008, 59(5): 616-623. |
6 | Yang Feng, Wu Desheng, Liang Liang, et al. Competition strategy and efficiency evaluation for decision making units with fixed-sum outputs[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 212(3): 560-569. |
7 | Yang Min, Li Yongjun, Chen Ya, et al. An equilibrium efficiency frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 239(2): 479-489. |
8 | Yang Min, Li Yongjun, Liang Liang. A generalized equilibrium efficient frontier data envelopment analysis approach for evaluating DMUs with fixed-sum outputs[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 246(1): 209-217. |
9 | Wu Jie, An Qingxian, Yao Xin, et al. Environmental efficiency evaluation of industry in China based on a new fixed sum undesirable output data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 74: 96-104. |
10 | Wu Jie, Xia Panpan, Zhu Qingyuan, et al. Measuring environmental efficiency of thermoelectric power plants: a common equilibrium efficient frontier DEA approach with fixed-sum undesirable output[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 275(2): 731-749. |
11 | Fang Lei. A new approach for achievement of the equilibrium efficient frontier with fixed-sum outputs[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016, 67(3): 412-420. |
12 | Zhu Qingyuan, Wu Jie, Song Malin, et al. A unique equilibrium efficient frontier with fixed-sum outputs in data envelopment analysis[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2017, 68(12): 1483-1490. |
13 | Chen Lifan, Guo Mengyu, Li Yongjun, et al. Efficiency intervals, rank intervals and dominance relations of decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 292(1): 238-249. |
14 | Zhu Qingyuan, Li Xingchen, Li Feng, et al. Energy and environmental efficiency of China's transportation sectors under the constraints of energy consumption and environmental pollutions[J]. Energy Economics, 2020, 89: 104817. |
15 | Li Yongjun, Hou Wenhui, Zhu Weiwei, et al. Provincial carbon emission performance analysis in China based on a Malmquist data envelopment analysis approach with fixed-sum undesirable outputs[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2021a, 304(1-2): 233-261. |
16 | Li Yongjun, Liu Jin, Sheng Ang, et al. Performance evaluation of two-stage network structures with fixed-sum outputs: an application to the 2018winter Olympic Games[J]. Omega, 2021b, 102: 102342. |
17 | Färe R, Grosskopf S. Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach[J]. Economics Letters, 1996, 50(1): 65-70. |
18 | Kao C, Hwang S N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 185(1): 418-429. |
19 | Chen Yao, Cook W D, Li Ning, et al. Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(3): 1170-1176. |
20 | 李峰,朱平,梁樑,等.基于最近距离投影的DEA两阶段效率评价方法研究[J].中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 198-209. |
Li Feng, Zhu Ping, Liang Liang, et al. A two-stage DEA efficiency evaluation approach based on closest targets[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 198-209. | |
21 | Li Yongjun, Chen Yao, Liang Liang, et al. DEA models for extended two-stage network structures[J]. Omega, 2012, 40(5): 611-618. |
22 | Yu Yu, Shi Qinfen. Two-stage DEA model with additional input in the second stage and part of intermediate products as final output[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(15): 6570-6574. |
23 | Liang Liang, Li Zhaoqiong, Cook W D, et al. Data envelopment analysis efficiency in two-stage networks with feedback[J]. IIE Transactions, 2011, 43(5): 309-322. |
24 | Chen Yao, Du Juan, Sherman H D, et al. DEA model with shared resources and efficiency decomposition[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207(1): 339-349. |
25 | Wu Jie, Zhu Qingyuan, Ji Xiang, et al. Two-stage network processes with shared resources and resources recovered from undesirable outputs[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 251(1): 182-197. |
26 | Bian Yiwen, Hu Miao, Xu Hao. Measuring efficiencies of parallel systems with shared inputs/outputs using data envelopment analysis[J]. Kybernetes, 2015, 44(3): 336-352. |
27 | Li Lin, Dai Qianzhi, Huang Haijun, et al. Efficiency decomposition with shared inputs and outputs in two-stage DEA[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2016, 25(1): 23-38. |
28 | Zhu Qingyuan, Chen Jie, Li Feng. A comprehensive analysis of China’s regional energy and environment efficiency from supply chain perspective[J]. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 2022, 25(4-5): 709-724. |
29 | 毕功兵,梁樑,杨锋.资源约束型两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J].中国管理科学, 2009, 17(2): 71-75. |
Bi Gongbing, Liang Liang, Yang Feng. A DEA-based efficiency-measuring model for two-stage production systems with constrained resources[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(2): 71-75. | |
30 | 郑建锋,王应明.共享产出关联视角下中国工业企业绿色研发投入效率测度与分解[J].生态经济, 2021, 37(3): 61-67+87. |
Zheng Jianfeng, Wang Yingming. Measurement and decomposition of green R&D input efficiency of Chinese industrial enterprises from the perspective of shared output correlation[J]. Ecological Economy, 2021, 37(3): 61-67+87. | |
31 | 石晓,谢建辉,李勇军,等.非合作博弈两阶段生产系统DEA并购效率评价[J].中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7): 60-67. |
Shi Xiao, Xie Jianhui, Li Yongjun, et al. Merger Efficiency evaluation of two-stage production system based on non-cooperative game theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(7): 60-67. | |
32 | Cook W D, Hababou M. Sales performance measurement in bank branches[J]. Omega, 2001, 29: 299-307. |
33 | Zeng Ximei, Zhou Zhongbao, Liu Qing, et al. Environmental efficiency and abatement potential analysis with a two-stage DEA model incorporating the material balance principle[J]. Computers &Industrial Engineering, 2020, 148: 106647. |
34 | Seiford L M, Zhu J. Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002, 142(1): 16-20. |
35 | 楚雪芹,李勇军,崔峰,等.基于两阶段非期望 DEA 模型的商业银行效率评估[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(3): 636-648. |
Chu Xueqin, Li Yongjun, Cui Feng, et al. Efficiency evaluation of commercial banks based on two-stage DEA model with undesirable output[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2021, 41(3): 636-648. |
[1] | Guangyu Wan,Feiyan Pu,Zichun Li,Yu Cao. Impact of Marketing Capability and Production Operation Capability on Firms' Financial Performance [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 275-285. |
[2] | ZHOU Zhen, JIAN Hong-yu, HUANG Jia-pei, LIN Yun. The Influence of E-marketing on Cinema Performance Based on DEA and Grey Entropy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(5): 240-248. |
[3] | Qian-zhi DAI,Xiao-chi XU,Xi-yang LEI,Qian ZHAO. Cost Compensation Method for Incentives Based on Dynamic Non-cooperative Game and Super-efficiency DEA [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 185-192. |
[4] | Yan HUANG,Li-ye CHEN,Nan WU,Ying-ming WANG,Yong-wu DAI. Study on Interval Benchmarking Based on Efficiency Compensation Mechanism——Taking Forest Carbon Sink Efficiency as An Example [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 317-328. |
[5] | Xiao-lei WANG,Ren MU,Li ZHOU,Jin-quan DONG. An Evaluation Method of Input-output Performance of Decision Making Units Considering Efficiency and Effect [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(10): 128-135. |
[6] | LI Mei-juan, , LU Jin-cheng. A New Cross-efficiency Evaluation Method Based on Double Frontier and Its Application [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(1): 168-175. |
[7] | REN Teng, LI Shu-xuan, ZHOU Zhong-bao, LI Si-di, XIAO He-lu. Study on Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Development System Based on BLP-DEA and Satisfaction Degree [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(7): 99-109. |
[8] | DU Juan, PAN Meng, WANG Yun-feng. Disaggregating China’s National Carbon-reduction Target Based on Optimizing the Total Cost of Emission Reduction [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(7): 252-263. |
[9] | LIU Chuan-bin, DAI Wei, YU Le-an, YANG Jian-an. Study on Evaluation and Prediction of Scientific Research Platforms of Universities using a GCA-DEA-MSVC Methodology [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(3): 240-247. |
[10] | WANG Mei-qiang, HUANG Yang. A Neutral Two-stage Cross-efficiency Evaluation Approach [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(11): 229-238. |
[11] | WANG Xu, WANG Ying-ming, WANG Liang, LAN Yi-xin, ZHANG Xing-xian. Study on Cross-efficiency Ranking Based on Evidential Reasoning and Prospect Theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(11): 250-259. |
[12] | LI Feng, ZHU Ping, LIANG Liang, KOU Gang. A Two-stage DEA Efficiency Evaluation Approach Based on Closest Targets [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 198-209. |
[13] | XU Tao, YOU Jian-xin, SHAO Yi-lei. Commercial Bank Product Innovation Performance Evaluation Model Considering Risk Impact [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(6): 36-47. |
[14] | WANG Yu, YANG Shan-shan. Corporate Financial Distress Prediction Based on Multi-Dimensional Efficiency Indicators [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 32-41. |
[15] | XIA Qiong, YANG Feng, WU Hua-qing. The Operational Efficiency and Analysis of Influencing Factors of Chinese Commercial Bank: Perspective of “Triple Bottom Line” [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(8): 26-36. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
|