Chinese Journal of Management Science ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 180-188.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0023
Ying Zhou1,2(), Pingtao Yi1, Weiwei Li1, Chengju Gong3
Received:
2023-01-04
Revised:
2023-03-10
Online:
2024-11-25
Published:
2024-12-09
Contact:
Ying Zhou
CLC Number:
Ying Zhou, Pingtao Yi, Weiwei Li, Chengju Gong. The Objective Filtering Method of Group Evaluator's Emotional Behavioral Data and Its Simulation Verification Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(11): 180-188.
"
检验 内容 | 仿真 次数 | 配对差值 平均值 | 配对差值 标准差 | 标准误差 平均值 | 差值99% 置信下限 | 差值99% 置信上限 | t | 自由度 | 显著性 双尾 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10000 | 0.46006 | 0.07008 | 0.0007 | 0.45825 | 0.46187 | 656.454 | 9999 | 0.000 | |
20000 | 0.46848 | 0.07960 | 0.00056 | 0.46703 | 0.46993 | 832.323 | 19999 | 0.000 | |
30000 | 0.49602 | 0.10442 | 0.00060 | 0.49447 | 0.49757 | 822.771 | 29999 | 0.000 | |
40000 | 0.05008 | 0.11002 | 0.00055 | 0.49937 | 0.50221 | 910.342 | 39999 | 0.000 | |
50000 | 0.42975 | 0.03230 | 0.00014 | 0.42938 | 0.43013 | 2975.469 | 49999 | 0.000 | |
10000 | 0.05165 | 0.00834 | 0.00008 | 0.05144 | 0.05187 | 619.375 | 9999 | 0.000 | |
20000 | 0.05070 | 0.00923 | 0.00007 | 0.05053 | 0.05087 | 776.997 | 19999 | 0.000 | |
30000 | 0.04888 | 0.01162 | 0.00007 | 0.04871 | 0.04906 | 728.786 | 29999 | 0.000 | |
40000 | 0.04846 | 0.01216 | 0.00006 | 0.04831 | 0.04862 | 797.229 | 39999 | 0.000 | |
50000 | 0.05396 | 0.00408 | 0.00002 | 0.05392 | 0.05401 | 2955.686 | 49999 | 0.000 |
"
模拟 参数 | 情境1
| 情境1
| 情境2
| 情境2
| 情境3
| 情境3
| 情境4
| 情境4
| 情境5
| 情境5
| 情境6
| 情境6
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 100% | 87% | 97% | 100% | 100% |
X2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
X3 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
X4 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
X5 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 40% | 88% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
"
员工 编号 | 领导1 | 领导2 | 领导3 | 领导4 | 领导5 | 传统评分 | 传统排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
员工1 | 81.26 | 80.63 | 60.34 | 61.28 | 55.20 | 67.74 | 6 |
员工2 | 58.64 | 57.95 | 57.30 | 58.20 | 55.64 | 57.55 | 10 |
员工3 | 75.80 | 95.47 | 74.85 | 74.32 | 70.64 | 78.22 | 3 |
员工4 | 79.90 | 80.68 | 79.17 | 78.84 | 80.44 | 79.81 | 1 |
员工5 | 55.36 | 55.84 | 54.66 | 55.64 | 51.64 | 54.63 | 13 |
员工6 | 50.18 | 48.74 | 51.19 | 48.88 | 54.32 | 50.66 | 14 |
员工7 | 57.92 | 56.90 | 58.83 | 59.96 | 55.16 | 57.75 | 9 |
员工8 | 78.38 | 78.74 | 81.02 | 79.68 | 75.20 | 78.60 | 2 |
员工9 | 55.28 | 56.84 | 57.02 | 55.36 | 53.12 | 55.52 | 11 |
员工10 | 53.56 | 53.95 | 54.32 | 54.20 | 58.84 | 54.97 | 12 |
员工11 | 66.20 | 66.53 | 67.83 | 69.44 | 66.56 | 67.31 | 7 |
员工12 | 73.72 | 74.05 | 74.70 | 72.04 | 77.80 | 74.46 | 5 |
员工13 | 76.46 | 75.32 | 77.17 | 75.72 | 81.32 | 77.20 | 4 |
员工14 | 63.26 | 60.11 | 61.66 | 62.16 | 62.96 | 62.03 | 8 |
"
员工 编号 | 领导1 | 领导2 | 领导3 | 领导4 | 领导5 | 极差 | 本文评分 | 本文排序 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
员工1 | 0.0126 | 0.0125 | 0.0140 | 0.0139 | 0.0143 | 0.0018 | 67.13 | 7 |
员工2 | 0.0143 | 0.0143 | 0.0143 | 0.0143 | 0.0145 | 0.0002 | 57.54 | 10 |
员工3 | 0.0137 | 0.0125 | 0.0137 | 0.0138 | 0.0140 | 0.0015 | 77.86 | 3 |
员工4 | 0.0140 | 0.0140 | 0.0140 | 0.0140 | 0.0139 | 0.0001 | 79.80 | 1 |
员工5 | 0.0143 | 0.0142 | 0.0143 | 0.0142 | 0.0146 | 0.0003 | 54.62 | 13 |
员工6 | 0.0144 | 0.0145 | 0.0143 | 0.0145 | 0.0140 | 0.0005 | 50.64 | 14 |
员工7 | 0.0143 | 0.0143 | 0.0142 | 0.0141 | 0.0145 | 0.0004 | 57.74 | 9 |
员工8 | 0.0140 | 0.0139 | 0.0138 | 0.0139 | 0.0141 | 0.0003 | 78.59 | 2 |
员工9 | 0.0144 | 0.0142 | 0.0142 | 0.0143 | 0.0145 | 0.0003 | 55.51 | 11 |
员工10 | 0.0144 | 0.0144 | 0.0143 | 0.0144 | 0.0140 | 0.0005 | 54.95 | 12 |
员工11 | 0.0143 | 0.0142 | 0.0141 | 0.0140 | 0.0142 | 0.0002 | 67.30 | 6 |
员工12 | 0.0141 | 0.0140 | 0.0140 | 0.0142 | 0.0138 | 0.0004 | 74.44 | 5 |
员工13 | 0.0140 | 0.0141 | 0.0140 | 0.0140 | 0.0137 | 0.0004 | 77.18 | 4 |
员工14 | 0.0142 | 0.0144 | 0.0143 | 0.0142 | 0.0142 | 0.0002 | 62.02 | 8 |
1 |
易平涛,李伟伟,郭亚军. 综合评价理论与方法(第二版)[M]. 北京:经济管理出版社, 2019.
|
|
|
2 |
苏为华. 多指标综合评价理论与方法问题研究[D]. 厦门:厦门大学博士学位论文, 2000.
|
|
|
3 |
王宗军. 综合评价的方法、问题及其研究趋势[J]. 管理科学学报, 1998, 1(1): 75-81.
|
|
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
丁涛,梁樑. 基于方案占优和排序稳健性的多属性决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(8): 132-138.
|
|
|
7 |
|
8 |
张发明,孙文龙. 基于区间数的多阶段交互式群体评价方法及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(10): 129-135.
|
|
|
9 |
王伟明,徐海燕,朱建军. 区间信息下的大规模群体DEMATEL决策方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(6): 1585-1597.
|
|
|
10 |
潘骏,沈惠璋,陈忠. 群体事件中用户传播重要性的评价模型[J]. 系统管理学报, 2020, 29(3): 434-442.
|
|
|
11 |
|
12 |
|
13 |
宫诚举,李伟伟,郭亚军. 群体评价中的序关系分析法[J]. 运筹与管理, 2020, 29(11): 152-156.
|
|
|
14 |
|
15 |
陈国宏,李美娟. 组合评价收敛性验证的计算机模拟实验[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2005(5): 74-82.
|
|
|
16 |
王伟明, 徐海燕,朱建军. 基于复杂网络和语言信息的交互式大规模群体评价方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(11):260-271.
|
|
|
17 |
张发明,郭亚军. 一种基于两阶段协商的群体评价方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2009, 31(7): 1647-1650.
|
|
|
18 |
|
19 |
|
20 |
郭亚军,周莹,易平涛,等. 基于全局信息的动态激励评价方法及激励策略[J]. 系统工程学报,2017, 32(2): 282-288.
|
|
|
21 |
周莹,易平涛,郭亚军. 心理阈值协同视角下的群体评价方法及应用[J]. 中国管理科学,2017, 25(4): 158-163.
|
|
|
22 |
郭亚军,李伟伟,易平涛. 带有情感客观过滤特征的综合评价方法及应用[J]. 系统工程, 2011, 29(4): 84-87.
|
|
[1] | Lu Wang,Pingtao Yi,Weiwei Li. Stochastic Simulation Integrated Method for Multi-source Uncertain Information and Its Application [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 103-112. |
[2] | Weiwei Li,Pingtao Yi,Lu Wang. Situation Oriented Evaluation Approaches Based on Behavior Characteristics Analysis and the Application [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(10): 171-180. |
[3] | ZHOU Ying, YI Ping-tao, WANG Lu, DONG Qian-kun. Objective Optimization Method and Verification Analysis of Group Evaluation Data from the Perspective of Psychological Threshold Coordination [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(7): 237-245. |
[4] | WANG Wei-ming, XU Hai-yan, ZHU Jian-jun. Interactive Large-scale Group Evaluation Method Based on Complex Network and Linguistic Information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(11): 260-271. |
[5] | LIU Jin-pei, YANG Hong-wei, CHEN Hua-you, ZHOU Li-gang. Group Decision Making with Interval Multiplicative Linguistic Preference Relations based on Cross-efficiency DEA and Group Consensus [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(2): 190-198. |
[6] | XU Lin-ming, LI Mei-juan. A Data Preprocessing Method in Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(1): 162-169. |
[7] | LIU Xiu-li, TU Zhuo-zhuo. Assessment Method on Water Environment Security and Its Application in Jing-Jin-Ji Region [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(3): 160-168. |
[8] | CHAI Qi-chen, GUO Ya-jun, GONG Cheng-ju, LI Wei-wei. Comprehensive Evaluation of Chinese Provincial Ecological Civilization Coordinated Development Degree [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(7): 184-190. |
[9] | ZHOU Ying, YI Ping-tao, GUO Ya-jun. Group Evaluation Method and Its Application from the Psychological Threshold Cooperation Perspective [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(4): 158-163. |
[10] | ZHANG Fa-ming, XIAO Wen-xing. Design of Dynamic Double Incentive Evaluation Mechanism and its Application Under Mixed Information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(12): 138-146. |
[11] | PENG Zhang-lin, ZHANG Qiang, WANG Su-feng, YANG Shan-lin. Research on a Recombination Evaluation Approach Based on the Previous Evaluation Results [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(9): 156-164. |
[12] | ZHANG Fa-ming, LI Xiao-shuang. A Group Evaluation Method and Application Based on Collaboration of Subject and Object under Interval Information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(6): 143-150. |
[13] | YU Shun-kun, ZHANG Ou. Rural Credit Agency Client Manager Comprehensive Evaluation System Design Based on Analytic Network Process [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(4): 167-176. |
[14] | LIAO Zhi-gao, ZHAN Min, XU Jiu-ping. Dynamic Comprehensive Evaluation and Speed Characteristics Analysis of a Matter-Element Method [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(11): 119-127. |
[15] | YI Ping-tao, LI Wei-wei, GUO Ya-jun. Information Integrated Frameworkand Its Algorithm of Generic Comprehensive Evaluation and the Applications [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(10): 131-138. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
|