社会网络环境下基于群智知识融合的大群体应急决策共识模型

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0525

Abstract

Abstract:

Aiming at the difficulty of incomplete information and reaching consensus in large-group emergency decision-making，a group wisdom fusion modelintegrating the wisdom of a wide range of groups for emergency decision making are constructed. On this basis， a consensus model for large group emergency decision making was designed to improve the level of group consensus.Firstly， the public group wisdom is mined in social media to obtain public topics and weights， which are used as decision-making attribute information to participate in the emergency decision-making process.Secondly， cohesion coefficient and coupling coefficient are defined based on trust relationship and preference relationshipamong experts， and cluster weights were determined. The group wisdom fusion model is applied to integrate expert wisdom and public wisdom， and hte comprehensive group wisdom result is obtained.Then， consensus feedback adjustment parameters are determined according to the characteristics of emergency decision-making problems， and consensus measurement based on the results of group wisdom fusion is conducted. By analyzing the cohesion characteristics and coupling characteristics of cluster， the type of cluster is identified and the preference adjustment suggestions are proposed to achieve a high consistency large group decision result. As a result， the rationality and superiority of the model methodproposed in this paper are verified by applying it to the case of “preventing and controlling of public health safety incident related to infectious diseases”.

Key words: social network, group wisdomfusion, large group, emergency decision-making, consensus reaching process

CLC Number:

C934

Xuanhua Xu,Ting Xiao,Xiaohong Chen. A consensus Model for Large-group Emergency Decision-making Based on Group Wisdomfusion under Social Network Environment[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(2): 285-297.

Figures/Tables 16

社会关系矩阵

网络关系图

代数式表示

T = t i - j = 0 ??? 0.4 ??? 0 ??? 1 0 ????? 0 ???? 0 ??? 0 0.7 ? 0.2 ?? 0 ??? 0 0 ???? 0 ???? 0.3 ? 0

$e 1 R e 2, e 1 R e 4, e 3 R e 1,$

$e 3 R e 2, e 4 R e 3$

	方案1	方案2	方案3
$e 1$	$0.29,0.46$	$0.51,0.24$	$0.31,0.42$
$e 2$	$0.19,0.44$	$0.49,0.18$	$0.26,0.45$
		……
$e 19$	$0.50,0.16$	$0.40,0.27$	$0.30,0.45$
$e 20$	$0.74,0.16$	$0.21,0.51$	$0.74,0.09$

聚集	人数	聚类结构	专家权重
$C 1$	4	$e 3, e 4, e 7, e 14$	$w 3 = 0.283$ , $w 4 = 0.157$ , $w 7 = 0.345$ , $w 14 = 0.215$
$C 2$	6	$e 2, e 5, e 8, e 11, e 18, e 20$	$w 2 = 0.128$ , $w 5 = 0.203$ , $w 8 = 0.191$ , $w 11 = 0.199$ , $w 18 = 0.126$ , $w 20 = 0.153$
$C 3$	4	$e 6, e 10, e 13, e 15$	$w 6 = 0.324$ , $w 10 = 0.301$ , $w 13 = 0.174$ , $w 15 = 0.201$
$C 4$	6	$e 1, e 9, e 12, e 16, e 17, e 19$	$w 1 = 0.195$ , $w 9 = 0.155$ , $w 12 = 0.168$ , $w 16 = 0.125$ , $w 17 = 0.222 w 19 = 0.135$

聚集	$X 1$	$X 2$	$X 3$
$C 1$	$0.40,0.27$	$0.44,0.29$	$0.48,0.21$
$C 2$	$0.51,0.25$	$0.32,0.34$	$0.55,0.15$
$C 3$	$0.31,0.34$	$0.40,0.31$	$0.35,0.34$
$C 4$	$0.33,0.39$	$0.41,0.24$	$0.33,0.33$

聚集	$I S (C k)$	$I T S C k$	$α C k$	$E S C k$	$E T S C k$	$β C k$	$W D C k$	$w C k$
$C 1$	0.851	0.293	0.250	0.897	0.588	0.528	0.473	0.114
$C 2$	0.738	0.524	0.387	0.895	0.381	0.341	1.134	0.273
$C 3$	0.801	0.935	0.749	0.898	0.538	0.483	1.550	0.373
$C 4$	0.830	0.662	0.549	0.886	0.620	0.549	1.000	0.241

轮次	共识水平	$G t$	$φ t$
0	$C L C 1 = 0.943$ , $C L C 2 = 0.891$ , $C L C 3 = 0.946$ , $C L C 4 = 0.929$ , $G C L = 0.927$	-	-
1	$C L C 1 = 0.930$ , $C L C 2 = 0.950$ , $C L C 3 = 0.968$ , $C L C 4 = 0.954$ , $G C L = 0.950$	0.023	0.023
2	$C L C 1 = 0.937$ , $C L C 2 = 0.945$ , $C L C 3 = 0.972$ , $C L C 4 = 0.950$ , $G C L = 0.951$	0.001	0.037

$e 2$	$e 5$	$e 8$	$e 11$	$e 18$	$e 20$	群体
0.91	0.58	0.40	0.27	0.46	0.70	0.54

$x 1$	$x 2$	$x 3$
$0.33,0.34$	$0.35,0.30$	$0.40,0.28$

对比文献	聚集权重向量	考虑的中心性特征	融合影响因素分析	方案排序
文献[44]	$(0.203$ , $0.313$ , $0.201$ ,0.282)	2个	信任关系	$x 3 > x 2 > x 1$
本文	$(0.114$ , $0.273$ , $0.373$ ,0.241)	4个	信任关系、偏好关系	$x 3 > x 2 > x 1$

对比文献	迭代次数	调整专家数量	调整灵活度	参数确定	方案排序
文献[45]	6	1	低，确定的调整值	主观	$x 2 > x 3 > x 1$
文献[46]	2	8~9	低，确定的调整值	主观	$x 3 > x 2 > x 1$
文献[47]	2	4~6	低，确定的调整值	主观	$x 3 > x 2 > x 1$
本文	2	4~6	高，可选择的调整区间	客观	$x 3 > x 2 > x 1$

References 47

1	陈志平. 地方政府突发公共事件应急管理研究［D］. 安徽大学， 2017.
	Chen Z P. Research on emergency management of local government public emergency［D］. Anhui University， 2017.
2	John C. Decision making in emergencies［J］. Disaster Prevention and Management， 1996，4（5）： 28-35.
3	Wan S A， Kamis N H， Ahmad S A S， et al. Similarity-trust network for clustering-based consensus group decision-making model［J］. International Journal of Intelligent Systems， 2022，37（4）： 2758-2773.
4	Wan S P， Chen Z H， Dong J Y. Bi-objective trapezoidal fuzzy mixed integer linear program-based distribution center location decision for large-scale emergencies［J］. Applied Soft Computing， 2021，110： 107757.
5	王伟明，徐海燕，朱建军，等.基于TTD_WAA算子和TPBM算子的混合型多属性大群体决策方法［J］.中国管理科学，2021，DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1031 . doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1031
	Wang W M， Xu H Y， Zhu J J. A hybrid multiple attribute large group decision-making approach based on TTD_WAA operator and TPBM operator［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2021，DOI：10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1031 . doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1031
6	Xu X H， Du Z J， Chen X H. Consensus model for multi-criteria large-group emergency decision making considering non-cooperative behaviors and minority opinions［J］.Decision Support Systems， 2015，79： 150-160.
7	李海涛，罗党，孙德才. 多元不确定偏好下灰色局势群体应急决策方法［J］. 中国安全科学学报， 2017，27（12）： 140-146.
	Li H T， Luo D， Sun D C. A grey situation group emergency decision-making methodwith multiple uncertain preference information［J］. China Safety Science Journal. 2017， 27（12）：140-146.
8	李海明，虞钢，田崇鑫，等. 一种基于模糊语言TOPSIS的应急决策方法［J］. 中国科学院大学学报， 2020，37（6）： 814-819.
	Li H M， Yu G， Tian C X， et al. An emergency decision method based on fuzzy linguistic TOPSIS［J］.Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2020， 37（6）：814-819.
9	Ashraf S， Abdullah S. Emergency decision support modeling for COVID‐19 based on spherical fuzzy information［J］. International Journal of Intelligent Systems， 2020，11（35）： 1601-1645.
10	Zheng J， Wang Y M， Zhang K， et al. A dynamic emergency decision-making method based on group decision making with uncertainty information［J］. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science， 2020，11（5）： 667-679.
11	Xian S D， Wan W H， Yang Z J. Interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy linguistic TODIM based on PCA and its application for emergency decision［J］. International Journal of Intelligent Systems， 2020，11（35）： 2049-2086.
12	魏俐华，陈刚. 区间Pythagorean模糊前景多阶段多属性应急决策方法［J］. 计算机工程与应用， 2020，56（24）： 109-115.
	Wei L H， Chen G. Multi-stage multi-attribute emergency decision making method based on prospect theorywith interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy linguistic numbers［J］. Computer Engineering and Applications， 2020，56（24）：109-115.
13	钱丽丽，刘思峰，方志耕基于后悔理论的灰色应急决策方案动态调整方法［J］.运筹与管理，2020，29（8）： 73-78.
	Qian L L， Liu S F， Fang Z G. Dynamic adjusting method for grey emergency decision based on ｒegret theory［J］. Operations Research AND Management Science， 2020，29（8）：73-78.
14	徐选华，马志鹏，陈晓红.基于公众偏好大数据分析的大群体应急决策质量动态演化研究［J］.中国管理科学，2022，30（7）： 149-149.
	Xu X H， Ma Z P， Chen X H. Dynamic evolution research on emergency decision quality of large group basing on the public preferences big data［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science，2022，30（7）： 149-149.
15	魏静静. 社交媒体下的群体智慧决策一致性判定研究［D］. 郑州大学， 2020.
	Wei J J. Research on judgment consistency of group intelligence decision under social media［D］.Zhengzhou： Zhengzhou University，2020.
16	Yoon S， Michelle O， Peter B， et al. Application of social network analysis of COVID-19 related tweets mentioning cannabis and opioids to gain insights for drug abuse research［J］. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics， 2020，272： 5-8.
17	Daniela P， Bouchachia A， Hellwagner H. Online indexing and clustering of social media data for emergency management［J］. Neurocomputing， 2016，200： 168-179.
18	Yury K， Chen H H， Obradovich N， et al. Rapid assessment of disaster damage using social media activity［J］. Science Advances， 2016，2（3）： e1500779.
19	Hung M， Evelyn L， Eric S H， et al. Social network analysis of COVID-19 sentiments： application of artificial intelligence［J］.Journal of Medical Internet Research， 2020，22（8）： e22590.
20	Brown-BC P D. “Peer production” promises to leap in importance［J］. Information Week， 2002（7）： 870.
21	Iván P， Estrella F J， Martínez L， et al. Consensus under a fuzzy context： taxonomy， analysis framework AFRYCA and experimental case of study［J］. 2014，20： 252-271.
22	Liu B S， Zhou Q， Ding R X， et al. Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis： trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination［J］.European Journal of Operational Research， 2018， 275（2）： 737-754.
23	Friedkin N E， Johnsen. E C. Social influence and opinions［J］. Journal of Mathematical Sociology， 2010，15（3-4）： 3-206.
24	Morente J A， Kou K S， Ureña E H R.. Carrying out consensual Group Decision Making processes under social networks using sentiment analysis over comparative expressions［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems， 2018（165）： 335-345.
25	Xu Y J， Wen X W， Zhang W C. A two-stage consensus method for large-scale multi-attribute group decision［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2018，116： 113-129.
26	Chu J F， Wang Y M， Liu X W， et al. Social network community analysis based large-scale group decision making approach with incomplete fuzzy preference relations［J］. Information Fusion， 2020，60：98-120.
27	Atefeh T， Eslami E， Enrique E V， et al. Trust based group decision making in environments with extreme uncertainty［J］. Knowledge-Based Systems， 2020，191（C）： 105168.
28	Wu T， Liu X W， Gong Z W， et al. The minimum cost consensus model considering the implicit trust of opinions similarities in social network group decision‐making［J］. International Journal of Intelligent Systems， 2020，35（3）： 470-493.
29	Lu Y L， Xu Y J， Enrique H V， et al. Consensus of large-scale group decision making in social network： the minimum cost model based on robust optimization［J］. Information Sciences， 2021，547： 910-930.
30	高远. 考虑信任关系的语言型群决策共识模型研究［D］. 大连：大连理工大学， 2021.
	Gao Y. Research on consensus model for linguistic group decisionmaking by considering trust relationship［D］. Dalian： Dalian University of Technology，2021.
31	Atanassov K T. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets［J］. Fuzzy Sets and Systems， 1986，20（1）： 87-96.
32	Liu B S， Shen Y H， Zhang W， et al. An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy principal component analysis model： based method for complex multi-attribute large-group decision-making［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2015，245（1）： 209-225.
33	Xu Z S. A Deviation： based approach to intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making［J］. Group Decision and Negotiation，2010，19（1）： 57-76.
34	Xu Z S， Yager R R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets［J］. International Journal of General Systems， 2006，35（4）： 417-433.
35	Xu Z S. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators［J］. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems， 2007，15（6）： 1179-1187.
36	吴吉义.A New Approach to Web Applications with Ajax［J］. 四川大学学报（工程科学版）， 2007（S1）： 157-162.
	Wu J Y.A new approach to web applications with ajax［J］.Journal of Sichuan University：Engineering Science Edition，2007（S1）：157-162.
37	王晰巍，邢云菲，赵丹，等. 基于社会网络分析的移动环境下网络舆情信息传播研究——以新浪微博“雾霾”话题为例［J］. 图书情报工作， 2015，59（07）： 14-22.
	Wang X W， Xing Y F， Zhao D， et al.Research on network public opinion information dissemination in mobile environment based on social network analysis： a case study of “Haze” topic on Sina Weibo［J］. Library And Information Service， 2015，59（7）：14-22.
38	Du Z J， Yu S M， Luo H Y， et al. Consensus convergence in large-group social network environment： coordination between trust relationship and opinion similarity［J］.Knowledge-Based Systems， 2021（217）： 106828-106846.
39	Liu X， Xu Y J， Montes R， et al. Social network group decision making： managing self-confidence-based consensus model with the dynamic importance degree of experts and trust-based feedback mechanism［J］. Information Sciences， 2019，505（C）： 215-232.
40	朱娟，唐晓波. 基于三层知识融合模型的个性化商品推荐［J］. 图书馆学研究， 2017（5）： 24-30.
	Zhu J， Tang X B. Personalized product recommendation based on three-layer knowledge fusion model［J］. Research in Library Science，2017（5）： 24-30.
41	徐选华，吴慧迪.基于改进云模型的语言偏好信息多属性大群体决策方法［J］.管理工程学报，2018，32（1）： 117-125.
	Xu X H， Wu H D. Multi-attribute large group decision making method for language preference Information based on improved cloud model［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management， 2018，32（1）： 117-125.
42	Blondel V D， Guillaume J L， Lambiotte R， et al. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks［J］. Journal of Statistical Mechanics： Theory and Experiment， 2008，2008（10）：10008.
43	Wu J， Dai L F， Chiclana F， et al. A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust［J］. Information Fusion， 2018，41： 232-242.
44	徐选华，张前辉. 社会网络环境下基于共识的风险性大群体应急决策非合作行为管理研究［J］. 控制与决策， 2020，35（10）： 2497-2506.
	Xu X H， Zhang Q H. Management of non-cooperative behavior in consensus-based large groupemergency decision-making in social network environment［J］. Control and Decision， 2020，35（10）： 2497-2506.
45	吴志彬，徐雷. 两种基于个体偏好集结的多属性群决策共识方法［J］.控制与决策，2014，29（3）： 487-493.
	Wu Z B， Xu L. Two consensus approaches for multiple attribute group decision makingbased on aggregating individual preferences［J］. Control and Decision，2014，29（3）： 487-493.
46	Kamis N H， Chiclana F， Levesley J. Preference similarity network structural equivalence clustering based consensus group decision making model［J］. Applied Soft Computing， 2018，67： 706-720.
47	Xu Y J， Wen X W， Zhang W C. A two-stage consensus method for large-scale multi-attribute group decision making with an application to earthquake shelter selection［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2018，116： 113-129.

主题	关键词	权重
医护保障	医护人员、奔赴前线、援助、捐款、医用、驰援等	0.314
感染风险	干咳、发烧、呼吸困难、就诊、防治、发病、就医等	0.282
监测控制	指挥、部署、响应、领导小组、防控、专题会议等	0.214
生活影响	复工、外出、封城、返岗、恢复、出行、延期等	0.190

[1]	WANG Hong-wei, LI Jue, LIU Jian-guo, FAN Ying, MA Liang, HUO Hong, LIU Zuo-yi, DING Lie-yun. Research on Human-machine Integration Complex Social System [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(7): 1-21.
[2]	YAN Meng-ying, AI Shi-zhong, DU Rong. Research on the Strategies Choice of Participating in CYKS Platform [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(4): 130-141.
[3]	WENG Ke-rui, ZHOU Jing. Study on Updated Products Launch Timing and Seed Optimization under a Non-Delisting Strategy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 226-234.
[4]	Shi-feng LIU,Lai-song KANG,Da-qing GONG. An Event POI Recommendation System for Groups in EBSN [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 301-310.
[5]	XU Xuan-hua, MA Zhi-peng, CHEN Xiao-hong. Dynamic Evolution Research on Emergency Decision Quality of Large Group Based on the Public Preferences Big Data [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(7): 140-149.
[6]	JIAO Yuan-yuan, YAN Xin, DU Jun, ROGER Jiao. Research on Product Line Planning Considering Peer Influence in Social Network Context [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(12): 108-119.
[7]	NI Pei-kun, ZHU Jian-ming, WANG Guo-qing. Disinformation Diffusion Activity Minimization by Edge Blocking in Online Social Networks [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(9): 188-200.
[8]	YAO Sheng-bao, GU Miao. A Consensus Model for Group Decision Making under the Influence of Empathy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(11): 203-214.
[9]	GU Qiu-yang, WU Bao, CHI Ren-yong. Optimal Control Model of Social Network Public Opinion Considering Thought Time-Lag [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(11): 215-223.
[10]	JIN Feifei, LIU Jinpei, CHEN Huayou, DU Pengcheng. Social Network Group Decision-Making Model Based on Trust Relationship and Information Measures with Probabilistic Linguistic Information [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(10): 178-190.
[11]	YIN Xuan-peng, XU Xuan-hua, CHEN Xiao-hong. Risk-causing Analysis of Large Group Emergency Decision-making Based on Multi-agent Simulation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(2): 208-219.
[12]	SUN Bo, LIU Shan-shi, JIANG Jun-hui, GE Chun-mian, ZHOU Huai-kang. The Financial Constraints and Firm Innovation: From the Perspective of Human Capital Network [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(4): 179-189.
[13]	QU Shao-jian, LU Yan-ling, JI Ying. The Analysis of Crowdfunding Financing Mechanism Based on Social Network [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3): 1-10.
[14]	MI Chuan-min, LI Dan-dan, ZHANG Ting, QIAN Yuan-yuan, ZHOU Zhi-peng. Study on Financial Market Supernetwork Equilibrium Considering Social Network and Internet Finance [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(12): 56-65.
[15]	LIU Yu, LIANG Xun, YANG Xiao-ping. Information Propagation Model of Microblog Network Based on Petri Nets [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(12): 158-167.

A consensus Model for Large-group Emergency Decision-making Based on Group Wisdomfusion under Social Network Environment

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 16

References 47

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0