主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 116-128.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0473cstr: 32146.14/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0473

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于个体优势识别的“长效—多方位”系统评析方法构建

赵希男(), 陈俊领, 孙晨曦   

  1. 东北大学工商管理学院,辽宁 沈阳 110169
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-09 修回日期:2022-10-09 出版日期:2025-06-25 发布日期:2025-07-04
  • 通讯作者: 赵希男 E-mail:xnzhao@mail.neu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71271048)

Construction ofLong-term-Multi-directionalSystem Evaluation Method Based on Individual Advantage Identification

Xinan Zhao(), Junling Chen, Chenxi Sun   

  1. School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China
  • Received:2022-03-09 Revised:2022-10-09 Online:2025-06-25 Published:2025-07-04
  • Contact: Xinan Zhao E-mail:xnzhao@mail.neu.edu.cn

摘要:

对事物动态发展状况的掌握催生了动态评价方法的需求。为弥补单视角动态评价方法所得到的评价结果信息量少,对决策支持力度较弱,以及多种评价方法的组合评价不协调的问题,提出基于个体优势识别的“长效-多方位”系统评析方法。首先,为保证评价过程的动态长效性,并从充分挖掘被评价对象个体价值角度,构建了包括战略观念下的价值指标体系、动态数据标准化、指标权重、评价方法的选择和评价角度与方位的研究框架;其次,为满足多方位评价的需求,在“个体代理评价”的基础上,进一步构建了多主体多因素动态评析(T-O-F)、时点截面动态评析(t-O-F)、单主体多因素动态评析(T-o-F)和多主体单因素动态评析(T-O-f)的评价框架。最后,通过对我国26个省份2015—2019年区域科技创新能力进行应用研究,多方位揭示我国区域科技创新能力状况,为相关部门提供决策支持;同时,也表明基于个体优势识别的“长效-多方位”系统评析方法为实现多方位系统综合评价开拓了新方式。

关键词: 动态评价体系, 长效性, 多方位, 个体代理, 系统评析

Abstract:

The mastery of the dynamic development of things leads to the need for dynamic evaluation methods.In order to make up for the problems that the evaluation results provided by the single perspective dynamic evaluation method are less informative, the strength of decision support is weak, and the combination evaluation of multiple methods is not coordinated, a “long-acting and multi-directional” systematic evaluation method is proposed based on individual advantage identification.Firstly, in order to ensure the dynamic long-term performance of the evaluation process and fully explore the individual value of the evaluated object, the research framework including value index system under the strategic concept, dynamic data standardization, index weight, evaluation method selection, evaluation Angle and orientation is constructed.Secondly, in order to meet the needs of multi-directional evaluation, on the basis of "individual agent evaluation", the evaluation frameworks of multi-agent multi-factor dynamic evaluation (T-O-F), time-point cross-section dynamic evaluation (t-O-F), single-agent multi-factor dynamic evaluation (T-o-F) and multi-agent single-factor dynamic evaluation (T-O-f) are further constructed.Through model construction and application research, the following conclusions can be drawn:The method is based on the unified strategic concept to carry out multi-directional dynamic evaluation and analysis, and the guiding ideology is clear,it not only avoids the ambiguity of the guiding ideology of the combined evaluation method system, but also avoids the incongruity among the multi-angle evaluation methods.(2) The improved data standardization method has the characteristics of dynamic and long-term effect, which can not only evaluate the current information, but also be compatible with the subsequent newly added information, so as to meet the continuous and long-term needs of dynamic evaluation.(3) the weight of previous evaluation method for curing weights, the pattern of “unified” without respect individual value proposition by the evaluation behavior main body, and based on the individual advantage of feature recognition method, it is concluded that the personalized weight of the differences between the respect for the actors, the evaluation behavior subject can fully show their own good. At the same time, "agent evaluation" method can be evaluated from multiple angles, which is conducive to the objectivity and adequacy of the evaluation results.(4) This method has some functions that the existing evaluation methods do not have. The multi-agent and multi-factor (T-O-F) orientation can reveal the evolution of dynamic dominant characteristics and development level of (n*N) evaluated objects, the time-point cross section (t-O-F) orientation can reveal the dynamic dominant characteristics and development level of the evaluated actors at different time points, and the single-agent and multi-factor (T-o-F) orientation can reveal each evaluated row independently Body development status and multi-agent single factor (T-O-f) orientation can represent the performance of all evaluated actors in the whole stage of single index factor, and reveal the development differences of different evaluated actors in this index, and can also carry out comparative analysis among index factors.To sum up, this method can not only carry out outcome evaluation (evaluation ranking or evaluation value), but also carry out process evaluation, that is, it can identify the dynamic development characteristics and comprehensive level in the development process of things. Thus, “long-term-Multi-directional” process and result dynamic evaluation and analysis can be achieved, and the consistency of single evaluation method and the stability of combined evaluation method can further enhance the objectivity and practicability of evaluation.

Key words: dynamic evaluation system, long-term utility, multi - directional analysis, individual agent evaluation, systematic evaluation

中图分类号: