主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 36-46.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.01.004

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于前景理论的PPP项目投资者逆向选择问题研究

高若兰, 周亦宁, 刘继才   

  1. 西南交通大学经济管理学院, 四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-27 修回日期:2019-03-19 发布日期:2021-02-07
  • 通讯作者: 刘继才(1976-),男(汉族),湖北汉川人,西南交通大学经济管理学院,工程管理系主任,教授、博导,研究方向:项目融资(PPP)、项目管理,E-mail:jicailiu@126.com. E-mail:jicailiu@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71571149)

Adverse Selection of Investors in PPP Projects Based on Prospect Theory

GAO Ruo-lan, ZHOU Yi-ning, LIU Ji-cai   

  1. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
  • Received:2018-06-27 Revised:2019-03-19 Published:2021-02-07

摘要: PPP项目中投资者逆向选择问题时有发生,严重制约我国PPP模式的可持续发展。为减少投资者逆向选择,在采购阶段对投资者合理筛选机制的设置至关重要。考虑到政府部门和投资者均为"有限理性",本文基于前景理论,构建了PPP项目采购阶段双方之间的信号博弈模型。研究结果表明,低能力投资者的伪装成本是PPP市场实现分离均衡的决定性因素。为节约政府部门的检查成本,并使PPP市场更容易出现分离均衡,本文引入政府部门抽检模型,即对投资者报价的合理性进行抽检,进而得到最优抽检比例,可完全杜绝投资者逆向选择。通过数值模拟显示,政府部门最优抽检比例随着高能力投资者可获得合理利润率的增加而增加,但随着伪装成本、政府惩罚力度和高能力投资者折现率报价的增加而降低;且相比于收益,投资者对损失更为敏感,但随着收益和损失的增加,其敏感程度降低,符合前景理论。前景理论的引入,考虑了博弈过程中决策者的心理因素,使结果更接近真实情况。最后,为有效抑制投资者逆向选择,本文针对性提出了相关政策建议,为政府部门和投资者的决策提供参考和依据,助力完善PPP项目治理体系。

关键词: PPP项目, 投资者逆向选择, 信号博弈, 前景理论

Abstract: Nowadays, PPP (public-private partnership) scheme has been widely applied in the worldwide. However, this scheme is much-maligned due to cost overruns and poor operational performance etc. Adverse selection of private investors is one of the important reasons for the poor performance. Usually, adverse selection of investors mainly occurs in the procurement stage of PPP projects. It refers that investors without enough strength obtain franchise, seriously constraining the sustainable development of PPP schemes. In order to curb such behavior, the screening mechanism during the procurement phase of PPP projects is essential. Considering the bounded rationality of the governments and investors, a signal game model is constructed, quotation contents covering the construction cost, operation cost and discount rate of by investors and the reasonable profit rate by the governments. The results show that the camouflage cost of investors is the determinant for the PPP market to achieve the separating equilibrium. To save the inspection cost of the governments and achieve the separating equilibrium easily, sampling inspection mechanism is proposed to check on investors with low bids, followed by the optimal sampling ratio, in which scenario adverse selection of investors can be eradicated. To enhance a better understanding, a numerical example is presented to demonstrate the application of the models presented earlier. The findings of numerical simulation suggest that the optimal sampling ratio improves with the increased reasonable profit rate for high-capability investors, while decreases with an increasing camouflage cost, the punishment by the governments and the discount rate quotation by investors with high ability. Compared with the revenues, investors are sensitive to losses, but the degree of sensitivity decreases with the increased revenues and losses, which conforms to the prospect theory. The psychological factors of decision makers in the game process is analyzed, indicating that the introduction of the prospect theory makes the results more reasonable and has a good engineering application value. Eventually, to reduce adverse selection of investors in PPP projects, some recommendations are proposed, providing a reference for the governments and investors and helping improve the governance system of schemes.

Key words: PPP projects, adverse selection of investors, signal game, prospect theory

中图分类号: