不同混合回收模式和权力结构的逆向供应链决策分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.10.013

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (10): 131-143.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.10.013

不同混合回收模式和权力结构的逆向供应链决策分析

公彦德¹, 蒋雨薇¹, 达庆利²

1. 南京审计大学商学院, 江苏南京 211815;
2. 东南大学经济管理学院, 江苏南京 210096

收稿日期:2018-06-08 修回日期:2018-10-30 出版日期:2020-10-20 发布日期:2020-11-11
通讯作者: 公彦德(1979-),男(汉族),山东沂南人,南京审计大学商学院,教授,博士,研究方向:供应链管理,E-mail:gongyande@126.com E-mail:gongyande@126.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目（18YJA630026）；江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目（PAPD）；江苏高校"青蓝工程"资助项目；审计信息工程与技术协同创新中心资助项目（18CICA03）

Decision Analysis of Reverse Supply Chain with Different Mixture Recycling Modes and Power Structures

GONG Yan-de¹, JIANG Yu-wei¹, DA Qing-li²

1. School of Business, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China;
2. College of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Received:2018-06-08 Revised:2018-10-30 Online:2020-10-20 Published:2020-11-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在制造商主导和销售商主导两种权力结构下，构建了制造商与销售商两者混合回收及制造商、销售商和第三方三者混合回收的四类逆向供应链模型，运用博弈理论求解，对四类逆向供应链进行比较发现：（1）回收竞争程度较高时，制造商的最优策略为制造商主导且两者混合回收；回收竞争程度较低时，制造商的最优策略为制造商主导且三者混合回收。（2）销售商的最优决策始终为参与制造商主导且制造商和销售商混合回收的逆向供应链，最差决策始终为销售商主导且三者混合回收的逆向供应链。（3）逆向供应链系统的最优决策为制造商主导两者混合回收或三者混合回收。（4）针对最佳权力结构和混合回收方式，制造商和逆向供应链系统的最优决策基本一致，均为制造商主导的逆向供应链；制造商、销售商和逆向供应链系统的最差策略均为销售商主导的逆向供应链。

关键词: 逆向供应链, 混合回收模式, 权力结构, 博弈论

Abstract: In order to improve the recycling rate of waste electrical and electronic products since the promulgation of the "Production Responsibility Extension System Implementation Plan", the government strongly encourages electrical and electronic product manufacturers to cooperate with retailers or third parties for recycling. In this context, based on the two power structures dominated by the manufacturer and the retailer, four types of reverse supply chain models are constructed when mixed recycling is manufacturer and retailer together or manufacturer, retailer and third party together.Using game theory, decision on mixed recycling mode was discussed from different perspectives, it is found that (1) if recycling degree is higher,that is 2s < k < 4.02742s, the optimal strategy of manufacturer is manufacturer-led and the two are mixed and recycled; If recycling degree is lower, that is k>4.02742s, the manufacturer's optimal strategy is manufacturer-led and the three firms mixed recycling. (2) Although the retailer has channel advantage in sales channel, the recycling enthusiasm is lower than the manufacturer, optimal decision for retailer is always manufacturer dominated and mixed recovery by manufacturer and retailer, the worst decision is always retailer dominated and mixed recovery by three firms. (3) If 2s < k < 3.91582s, then optimal decision for reverse supply chain system is manufacturer dominated and two firms mixed recovery, if k>3.91582s, then optimal decision for reverse supply chain system is manufacturer dominated and three firms mixed recovery. (4) According to the optimal power structure and hybrid recovery methods, reverse supply chain system's optimal decision-making is basically the same with manufacturer, optimal decision-making are both manufacturer dominated reverse supply chain; the worst strategy for three firms are retailer dominated reverse supply chain.Finally, conclusions are verified by a numerical example.The conclusions of this paper can provide theoretical references for reverse supply chain enterprises to choose recycling modes and partners.

Key words: reverse supply chain, mixed recovery model, power structure, game theory

中图分类号:

F224

公彦德, 蒋雨薇, 达庆利. 不同混合回收模式和权力结构的逆向供应链决策分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 131-143.

GONG Yan-de, JIANG Yu-wei, DA Qing-li. Decision Analysis of Reverse Supply Chain with Different Mixture Recycling Modes and Power Structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(10): 131-143.

参考文献

[1] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Wassenhove L N V. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2):239-252.
[2] Savaskan R C,Wassenhove L N.Reverse channel design:The case of competing retailers[J]. Management Science, 2006,52(1):1-14.
[3] 公彦德,达庆利. 闭环供应链主导模式与物流模式的组合研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2015,18(10):14-25..
[4] 王玉燕,李璟.公平关切下基于网络平台销售、回收的E-闭环供应链的主导模式研究[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(1):139-151.
[5] 陈军,田大钢. 闭环供应链模型下的产品回收模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学,2017,25(1):88-97.
[6] Heydari J, Govindan K, Jafari A. Reverse and closed loop supply chain coordination by considering government role[J]. Transportation Research Part D Transport & Environment, 2017, 52(Part A):379-398.
[7] 缪朝炜,夏志强. 基于以旧换新的闭环供应链决策模型[J]. 管理科学学报,2016,19(9):49-66.
[8] Li Jian, Wang Zhen, Jiang Bao, et al. Coordination strategies in a three-echelon reverse supply chain for economic and social benefit[J]. Applied Mathematical Modelling,2017,49(9):599-611.
[9] 余福茂,徐玉军. 零售商主导闭环供应链的奖惩机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(S1):491-495.
[10] 姚锋敏,徐素波,滕春贤. 双回收渠道下零售商主导闭环供应链决策模型[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2016,22(9):2195-2203.
[11] 姚锋敏,滕春贤. 公平关切下零售商主导的闭环供应链决策模型[J]. 控制与决策,2017,32(1):117-123.
[12] Hong I, Yeh J S. Modeling closed-loop supply chains in the electronics industry:A retailer collection application[J].Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2012, 48(4):817-829.
[13] Wei J, Govindan K, Li Y, et al.Pricing and collecting decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with symmetric and asymmetric information[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2015, 54(C):257-265.
[14] Zheng Benrong, Yang Chao, Yang Jun, et al. Dual-channel closed loop supply chains:forward channel competition, power structures and coordination[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55(12):3510-3527.
[15] 张成堂,杨善林. 双渠道回收下闭环供应链的定价与协调策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统,2013,19(7):1676-1683.
[16] Huang M, Song M, Lee L H, et al. Analysis for strategy of closed-loop supply chain with dual recycling channel[J].International Journal of Production Economics.2013, 144(2):510-520.
[17] 公彦德. 主导模式和回收方式最优组合与供应链稳定性[J]. 系统工程学报,2014,29(1):85-95.
[18] 李源,徐枞巍,冯南平. 多因素并发扰动下的双回收渠道闭环供应链研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2014,22(S1):466-472.
[19] Liu Liwen, Wang Zongjun, Hong Xianpei,et al. Collection effort and reverse channel choices in a closed-loop supply chain[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017,144(2):492-500.
[20] Esmaeili M, Allameh G, Tajvidi T. Using game theory for analysing pricing models in closed-loop supply chain from short- and long-term perspectives[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(7):1-18.
[21] 董乾东,李敏,姜素红. 基于产品质量差异的闭环供应链混合回收模式[J]. 系统工程,2017,35(2):116-121.
[22] Giri B C, Chakraborty A, Maiti T. Pricing and return product collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with dual-channel in both forward and reverse logistics[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 2017, 42(1):104-123.
[23] Yi Pengxing, Huang Min, Guo Lijun, et al. Dual recycling channel decision in retailer oriented closed-loop supply chain for construction machinery remanufacturing[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 137(11):1393-1405.
[24] 公彦德,蒋雨薇.闭环供应链混合回收模式定价及渠道选择研究[J].软科学,2018,32(5):127-131.

不同混合回收模式和权力结构的逆向供应链决策分析

Decision Analysis of Reverse Supply Chain with Different Mixture Recycling Modes and Power Structures

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王树强, 刘赫, 徐娜, 孟娣. 大气污染物排放权初始分配的区际协调方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 37-48.
[2]	李子庆. 网络视频媒体同步播出节目运营策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 230-238.
[3]	廖诺, 卢晨, 贺勇. 碳交易政策下节能服务公司参与供应链合作减排策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 160-167.
[4]	李巍, 张汉江, 杨柳. 基于市场划分的再制造许可费对定价策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 94-103.
[5]	唐书传, 刘云志, 肖条军. 考虑社会责任的供应链定价与碳减排决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 99-108.
[6]	王先甲, 刘佳. 基于合作博弈模型的公共河流水资源分配方案研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1): 1-9.
[7]	黄帅, 樊治平. 不同渠道权力结构下资金约束零售商的采购和融资策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1): 79-88.
[8]	李芳, 马鑫, 洪佳, 叶春明. 政府规制下非对称信息对闭环供应链差别定价的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 116-126.
[9]	陈崇萍, 陈志祥. 供应商产出随机与供应中断下的双源采购决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 113-122.
[10]	孙书省, 浦徐进, 韩广华. 考虑线下权力结构的制造商线上销售模式选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(5): 119-129.
[11]	屈绍建, 卢艳玲, 纪颖. 社交网络推送下的众筹融资机制分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 1-10.
[12]	李友东, 夏良杰, 王锋正. 基于产品替代的低碳供应链博弈与协调模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 66-76.
[13]	文悦, 王勇, 但斌, 士明军. 电商平台自营和制造商直销的多渠道竞争策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 77-89.
[14]	张李浩, 董款, 张荣. 基于碳配额交易和减排技术的供应链策略选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 63-72.
[15]	冯颖, 张炎治. 不同权力结构下TPL服务增值的供应链决策与效率评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(10): 164-175.