不同灾害场景下基于匮乏理论的应急物流决策模型构建与分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0755

Abstract

Abstract:

In recent years， there are more natural disasters occurring in China， which lead to more demand of relief supplies. Facing different scenarios of disasters， the decision-maker has to select suitable modelling tools to figure out the optimal solution based on the practical situation. However， recent modelling studies in emergency logistics tend to ignore the feeling of victims and are far from practice. To solve these problems， relevant literature and practical operations in emergency logistics are studied. The deprivation cost is suggeted as the measurement， new objective functions and constraints are considered based on scenarios of disasters， and it is pointed out that different types of decision-makers such as governments and non-governmental organizations should be distinguished. Based on them， the emergency logistics decision-making models are constructed in different scenarios of disasters and their application is shown through simple numerical experiment. It is shown that emergency logistics modelling needs to identify and distinguish different scenarios of disasters and types of decision-makers， and make trade-offs between different objective functions.

Key words: disaster management, emergency logistics decision-making model, deprivation theory

CLC Number:

Yu Fan,Xihui Wang. Construction and Analysis of Emergency Logistics Decision-Making Models Based on Deprivation Theory in Different Scenarios of Disasters[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 114-121.

Figures/Tables 10

基础模型	$M a x D C * - D C s . t . C o s t < B u d g e t O t h e r s p e c i f i c c o n s t r a i n t s$
目标函数	效果类目标函数
约束条件	预算约束及其他具体约束

紧急情况模型	$M a x D C * - D C s . t . 0 ≤ t ≤ T O t h e r s p e c i f i c c o n s t r a i n t s$
目标函数	效果类目标函数
约束条件	时间约束及其他具体约束

恢复阶段模型	$M a x D C * - D C / c o s t s . t . O t h e r s p e c i f i c c o n s t r a i n t s$
目标函数	效果-成本比
约束条件	其他具体约束

参数符号	参数解释	取值
T	总时间约束	120小时
B	总预算约束	30000元
DC(t)	匮乏成本函数	0.2869×exp(0.0998t)
n	需求点数量	5
$d j$	从各个需求点到物资分发中心的运输时间	$d 1 = 3$ 小时， $d 2 = 4$ 小时， $d 3 = 8$ 小时， $d 4 = 10$ 小时， $d 5 = 13$ 小时
$c f i x$	每次租用车队的固定成本	20000元
$c u d$	单次装卸货成本	150元
$c t$	单位时间运输成本	80元
$x i j$	辅助决策变量	第i次运输到达了需求点j，则为1；反之为0
$t i$	第i次运输运到某个需求点的时刻
m	总运输次数

References 29

[1]	United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. The human cost of disasters： An overview of the last 20 years （2000-2019）［R］.Working Paper， United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction， 2021.
[2]	United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Global humanitarian overview 2023 ［R］. Working Paper， United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs， 2022.
[3]	Kovacs G， Moshtari M. A roadmap for higher research quality in humanitarian operations： A methodological perspective［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2019， 276（2）： 395-408.
[4]	闫森，齐金平，张儒. 国内应急物流研究综述［J］. 物流科技， 2021， 44（1）： 73-77.
	Yan S， Qi J P， Zhang R. Summary of domestic emergency logistics research［J］. Logistics Sci-Tech， 2021， 44（1）： 73-77.
[5]	Gupta S， Starr M K， Farahani R Z， et al. Disaster management from a POM perspective： Mapping a new domain［J］. Production and Operations Management， 2016， 25（10）： 1611-1637.
[6]	中华人民共和国国务院. 国务院关于印发“十四五”国家应急体系规划的通知［M］. 北京：中华人民共和国国务院， 2022.
	State Council of the People's Republic of China. Notice on issuing the 14th Five-Year Plan for the National Emergency Response System ［M］.Beijing： State Council of the People's Republic of China， 2022.
[7]	United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. OCHA annual report 2024［R］. Working Paper， United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs， 2025.
[8]	Holguín-Veras J， Jaller M， Van Wassenhove L N， et al. On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics［J］. Journal of Operations Management， 2012， 30（7-8）： 494-506.
[9]	Holguín-Veras J， Pérez N， Jaller M， et al. On the appropriate objective function for post-disaster humanitarian logistics models［J］. Journal of Operations Management， 2013， 31（5）： 262-280.
[10]	樊彧. 应急物流数学规划模型框架的构建和改进——基于受灾者的角度［D］.合肥：中国科学技术大学， 2021.
	Fan Y. Constructing and improving emergency logistics mathematical programming modelling framework from victims’ perspective［D］. Hefei： University of Science and Technology of China， 2021.
[11]	邵建芳. 自然灾害生活类应急物资需求测算和储备策略研究［D］. 合肥：合肥工业大学， 2021.
	Shao J F. Study on the demand prediction and stockpile strategy of living supplies for natural disaster［D］. Hefei： Hefei University of Technology， 2021.
[12]	Cantillo V， Serrano I， Macea L F， et al. Discrete choice approach for assessing deprivation cost in humanitarian relief operations［J］. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences， 2018， 63： 33-46.
[13]	Holguín-Veras J， Amaya-Leal J， Cantillo V， et al. Econometric estimation of deprivation cost functions： A contingent valuation experiment［J］. Journal of Operations Management， 2016， 45： 44-56.
[14]	Shao J， Wang X， Liang C， et al. Research progress on deprivation costs in humanitarian logistics［J］. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction， 2020， 42： 101343.
[15]	Wang X， Wang X， Liang L， et al. Estimation of deprivation level functions using a numerical rating scale［J］. Production and Operations Management， 2017， 26（11）： 2137-2150.
[16]	Wang X， Fan Y， Liang L， et al. Augmenting fixed framework agreements in humanitarian logistics with a bonus contract［J］. Production and Operations Management， 2019， 28（8）： 1921-1938.
[17]	Duhamel C， Santos A C， Brasil D， et al. Connecting a population dynamic model with a multi-period location-allocation problem for post-disaster relief operations［J］. Annals of Operations Research， 2016， 247（2）： 693-713.
[18]	Hu C L， Liu X， Hua Y K. A bi-objective robust model for emergency resource allocation under uncertainty［J］. International Journal of Production Research， 2016， 54（24）： 7421-7438.
[19]	Dufour É， Laporte G， Paquette J， et al. Logistics service network design for humanitarian response in East Africa［J］. Omega， 2018， 74： 1-14.
[20]	Mahootchi M， Golmohammadi S. Developing a new stochastic model considering bi-directional relations in a natural disaster： A possible earthquake in Tehran （the Capital of Islamic Republic of Iran）［J］. Annals of Operations Research， 2018， 269（1）： 439-473.
[21]	Burkart C， Nolz P C， Gutjahr W J. Modelling beneficiaries’ choice in disaster relief logistics［J］. Annals of Operations Research， 2017， 256（1）： 41-61.
[22]	王海军，杜丽敬，马士华. 震后应急物流系统中双目标开放式选址：路径问题模型与算法研究［J］. 管理工程学报， 2016， 30（2）： 108-115.
	Wang H J， Du L J， Ma S H. Model and algorithms for integrated open location and routing problem in emergency logistics under earthquake［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management， 2016， 30（2）： 108-115.
[23]	楼振凯. 应急物流系统LRP的双层规划模型及算法［J］. 中国管理科学， 2017， 25（11）： 151-157.
	Lou Z K. Bi-level programming model and algorithmof location-routing problem in emergency logistics［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2017， 25（11）： 151-157.
[24]	陈文秀，陈洪波. 国内应急物流研究的综述与展望［J］. 物流工程与管理， 2022， 44（10）： 1-6+10.
	Chen W X， Chen H B. A review and prospect of domestic emergency logistics research［J］. Logistics Engineering and Management， 2022， 44（10）： 1-6+10.
[25]	Goldschmidt K H， Kumar S. Humanitarian operations and crisis/disaster management： A retrospective review of the literature and framework for development［J］. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction， 2016， 20： 1-13.
[26]	Núñez Ares J， de Vries H， Huisman D. A column generation approach for locating roadside clinics in Africa based on effectiveness and equity［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2016， 254（3）： 1002-1016.
[27]	Hasnain T， Sengul Orgut I， Ivy J S. Elicitation of preference among multiple criteria in food distribution by food banks［J］. Production and Operations Management， 2021， 30（12）： 4475-4500.
[28]	De Vries H， Van Wassenhove L N. Do optimization models for humanitarian operations need a paradigm shift？［J］. Production and Operations Management， 2020， 29（1）： 55-61.
[29]	Karsu Ö， Morton A. Inequity averse optimization in operational research［J］. European Journal of Operational Research， 2015， 245（2）： 343-359.

	路径	应急物流运作效果（目标函数值）	效果成本比	各需求点最长匮乏时间	实际运输时间
运输5次	5-4-2-1-3	213316	7.7344	(63, 70, 68, 84, 107)	76
运输6次	5-4-2-1-3-5	225201	7.5167	(63, 70, 68, 84, 76)	102
运输7次	1-3-5-2-1-4-3	225046	7.5166	(61, 68, 76, 72, 85)	98
运输8次	1-1-1-5-3-2-4-1	224030	7.4876	(76, 64, 68, 78, 89)	94
运输9次	1-1-1-3-1-4-2-3-1	181625	6.0744	(50, 64, 50, 70, max)	90
运输10次	1-1-1-1-1-1-4-2-3-1	181159	6.0629	(50, 60, 72, 74, max)	86

	路径	应急物流运作效果（目标函数值）	效果成本比	各需求点最长匮乏时间	实际运输时间
运输5次	5-4-2-1-3	213316	7.7344	(63, 70, 68, 84, 107)	76
运输6次	5-4-2-1-3-5	225201	7.5167	(63, 70, 68, 84, 76)	102
运输7次	5-3-4-1-2-5-3	225812	7.1595	(65, 72, 76, 68, 76)	118
运输8次	2-5-4-1-2-3-5-1	225836	7.1287	(57, 60, 76, 76, 76)	116
运输9次	1-1-5-3-2-1-4-5-1	225803	6.9908	(56, 62, 74, 78, 76)	120
运输10次	1-1-2-3-4-1-5-2-3-1	225646	6.9558	(56, 76, 76, 74, 75)	118

	路径	应急物流运作效果	效果成本比（目标函数值）	各需求点最长匮乏时间	实际运输时间
运输5次	5-4-2-1-3	213316	7.7344	(63, 70, 68, 84, 107)	76
运输6次	2-5-4-1-2-3	220721	7.7392	(63, 60, 76, 76, 99)	84
运输7次	1-1-5-3-2-1-4	222591	7.6387	(56, 62, 74, 78, 95)	88
运输8次	1-1-1-5-3-2-4-1	224030	7.4876	(76, 64, 68, 78, 89)	94
运输9次	1-1-1-1-5-2-3-4-1	224412	7.3098	(76, 66, 66, 84, 83)	100
运输10次	1-1-1-1-5-2-3-4-1-1	224413	7.1287	(76, 66, 66, 84, 83)	106

Construction and Analysis of Emergency Logistics Decision-Making Models Based on Deprivation Theory in Different Scenarios of Disasters

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 29

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Shujun Xu. Tiered Health Care System IoT Investment Decision Based on Patient's Medical Behavior Choice [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 192-201.
[2]	Xiao Tan, Jiaqi Cai, Zaiwu Gong. Group Intelligence Consensus Decision Modeling Based on Reinforcement Learning with the “Structure-Information” Coupled Network [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 357-368.
[3]	Peng Li, Ke Wang, Zhiwei Xu. A Two-sided Matching Decision-making Method Based on Preference-approval Structure and Prospect Theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 181-191.
[4]	Xuelong Chen, Zirui Wang, Miaomiao Li. Research on Agent Conflict Resolution Method for Multi-period Emergency Resource Allocation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 226-241.
[5]	Chuan Zhao, Ziyang Guo, Kun Wang, Kangyin Dong. Research on the Scale of Group-buying and Differential Pricing Decisions in Social E-commerce Considering Market Information Value [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 242-252.
[6]	Yang Wu, Haixiang Guo, Yong Shi, Wenkai Zhang, Lei Wang. Differential Allocation Decision and Subsidy Effect of Limited Infectious Disease Vaccination Subsidy: Based on a Modified SIR Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 80-92.
[7]	Yi Jing, Qinqin Liu, Lin Zhou. Research on the Manufacturer's Procurement Strategy Considering Supply Disruption Risk and Consumer Preference under the Impact of Sudden Events [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(3): 93-103.
[8]	Haiyan Wang, Zhaohan Sheng. Modeling of Complex System Management: A Research Paradigm Guided by Scenarios [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(2): 1-9.
[9]	Yukang He, Tao Jia, Weibo Zheng. Decentralized Resource Allocation Based Multi-project Scheduling Optimization to Dynamically Balance Cash Flows [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(2): 144-155.
[10]	Lilong Zhu, Yanping Xu. Pharmaceutical Enterprises' Quality Management Decision Moran Analysis under Blockchain Technology——Based on the Perspective of Prospect Theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(2): 185-194.
[11]	Fangchao Xu, Yongjian Li, Yusheng Wang, Xinyuan Lin, Xiaoming Zhao. Platform Empowers Manufacturing Industry: Concept, Structure, and Research Prospects of “Manufacturing Chain + Platform” Dual Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(2): 207-225.
[12]	Ye Jiang, Tiaojun Xiao. Releasing Sequence Strategy of Platform-type New Product Information Preannouncement [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(2): 226-238.
[13]	Hongping Yuan, Li Zhang, Bingbing Cao. Research on Privacy Protection and Reputation Maintenance Decision of Gift Product Supply Chain Enabled by Blockchain Technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(2): 336-347.
[14]	Shanlin Yang, Chao Fu, Minglun Ren, Xinbao Liu, Yezheng Liu, Bing Jiang, Jianping Li, Changyong Liang, Zhe Liang, Liang Liang, Cuiqing Jiang, Jianling Jiao, Jun Pei, Shaobo Wei. The Formation and Development of China’s Management Science and Engineering Discipline [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(1): 1-27.
[15]	Guoquan Chen, Qingye Luo, Jingyi Wang, Yanling Lin, Xiaoye Wang. A Leadership Process Research Based on Knowledge Potential [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2026, 34(1): 128-141.