Abstract:

Using 87 high-quality Chinese management journals and 1177 high-quality English management journals as the basis for literature retrieval， a bibliometric analysis is conducted on research related to Generative Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management. The analysis covers journal distribution， author and institution collaboration networks， and keyword-based literature analysis， organized according to the four subfields under the Management Science Department of the National Natural Science Foundation of China： Management Science and Engineering， Business Administration， Economic Sciences， and Macro Management and Policy. The findings include： 1） There are differences between Chinese and English-language literature. Chinese literature focuses on information resource management and library and information science. Collaborative relationships are primarily influenced by disciplinary， institutional， and geographical similarities. In contrast， English literature spans a wider range of journals， and institutions. However， consistent research outputs from cross-institutional collaboration have yet to emerge. Strengthening cross-disciplinary， cross-regional， and cross-institutional collaboration remains a need for both Chinese and English research. 2） In both Chinese and English literature， studies are mainly concentrated in the subfields of Macro Management and Policy， as well as Management Science and Engineering， with a strong emphasis on empirical and applied research. Business Administration and Economics have relatively fewer studies， and literature focusing on generative artificial intelligence technologies and associated risks is also limited. Furthermore， English-language literature exhibits a broader range of research themes and application areas than Chinese literature， with higher research volumes and greater thematic focus. Future research should emphasize the integration of generative artificial intelligence with management tools， theoretical theories， and complex management scenarios， as well as on addressing specific management research paradigms.

Key words: management, artificial intelligence （AI）, generative, large language models （LLMs）, ChatGPT