基于随机演化博弈的企业研发操纵多重监管路径研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1884

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the R&D manipulation phenomenon existing in the high-tech enterprise declaration, a three-party stochastic evolutionary game model of local government, applicant enterprise and intermediary institution is constructed. Stochastic differential equation theory is considered in the replicator dynamics equation of classical evolutionary game in order to simulate the external random interference between multi-players. The boundary conditions of the stable solution of the equation are solved. Variable effects on cooperation strategy of three parties including the influence of direction and degree is given through MATLAB simulation.

Key words: R&D manipulation, random environment, multi-party game, effective regulation

CLC Number:

F276.5

LI Junqiang, REN Hao, ZHEN Jie. Stochastic Evolutionary Game Analysis of Multiple Supervision Paths of Enterprise R&D Manipulation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(10): 191-201.

References

[1] Schumpeter J A. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits， capital， credit， interest， and the business cycle [M] . Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1934.
[2] Bloom N, Griffith R, Reenen J Van. Do R & D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979-1997 [J] . Journal of Public Economics, 2002, 85(1): 1-31.
[3] Minford L, Meenagh D. Testing a model of UK growth: A role for R&D subsidies [J] . Economic Modelling, 2019, 82: 152-167.
[4] Choi J, Lee J. Repairing the R&D market failure: Public R&D subsidy and the composition of private R&D [J] . Research Policy, 2017, 46: 1465-1478.
[5] 赵文, 李月娇, 赵会会. 政府研发补贴有助于企业创新效率提升吗?——基于模糊集定性比较分析(fsQCA)的研究 [J] . 研究与发展管理, 2020, 32(2): 37-47.Zhao Wen, Li Yuejiao, Zhao Huihui. Can government R&D subsidies improve the innovationefficiency of enterprises?—A study based on fsQCA [J] . R&D Management, 2020, 32(2): 37-47.
[6] Bianchi M, Murtinu S, Scalera V G. R&D subsidies as dual signals in technological collaborations [J] . Research Policy, 2019, 48(9): 103821.
[7] Wei Jiang, Zuo Yan. The certification effect of R&D subsidies from the central and local governments: Evidence from China [J] . R and D Management, 2018, 48(5): 615-626.
[8] Wu Ruirui, Liu Zhiying, Ma Chaoliang, et al. Effect of government R&D subsidies on firms’ innovation in China [J] . Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2020, 28(1): 42-59.
[9] Ahn J M, Lee W, Mortara L. Do government R&D subsidies stimulate collaboration initiatives in private firms? [J] . Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2020, 151: 119840.
[10] 杨国超, 刘静, 廉鹏,等. 减税激励、研发操纵与研发绩效 [J] . 经济研究, 2017(8): 110-124.Yang Guochao, Liu Jing, Lian Peng, et al. Tax-reducing Incentives，R&D manipulation and R&D performance [J] . Economic Research Journal, 2017(8): 110-124.
[11] 杨解君, 杨高臣. 打造从政策到法律的补贴制度升级版 ——以新能源汽车骗补为切入点 [J] . 江西社会科学, 2017(5): 187-194.Yang Xiejun, Yang Gaochen. An upgraded version of the subsidy system from policy to law-using-Taking the fraud of new energy vehicle as the starting point [J] .Jiangxi Social Sciences, 2017(5): 187-194.
[12] 黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新? ——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响 [J] . 经济研究, 2016(4): 60-73.Li Wenjing, Zheng Manni. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation?-Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises’ Innovation [J] . Economic Research Journal, 2016(4): 60–73.
[13] Zuo Wenchao, Li Yueqing, Wang Yuhong. Research on the optimization of new energy vehicle industry research and development subsidy about generic technology based on the three-way decisions [J] . Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 212: 46-55.
[14] 苑泽明, 王培林, 富钰媛. 高管学术经历影响企业研发操纵了吗？ [J] . 外国经济与管理, 2020, 4: 1-14.Yuan Zeming, Wang Peilin, Fu Yuyuan. Has the academic experience of executives affected theR&D manipulation of enterprises? [J] . Foreign Economics & Management, 2020, 4: 1-14.
[15] Guo Di, Guo Yan, Jiang Kun. Governance and e ff ects of public R & D subsidies: Evidence from China [J] . Technovation, 2018, 75: 18-31.
[16] 万源星, 许永斌. 高新认定办法、研发操纵与企业技术创新效率 [J] . 科研管理, 2019, 40(4): 54-62.Wan Yuanxing,Xu Yongbin. High-tech identification policy,R&D manipulation and firm technological innovation efficiency [J] . Science Research Management, 2019, 40(4): 54-62.
[17] 楚有为. 审计委员会专业背景与企业研发活动盈余操纵 [J] . 现代财经, 2018(10): 96-113.Chu Youwei. Audit committee with professional background and earnings manipulation in R&D activities [J] . Modern Finance And Economics-Fournal of Tianjin Universitj of Finance And Economics, 2018(10): 96-113.
[18] 周黎安. 中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究 [J] . 经济研究, 2007(7): 36-50.Zhou Li’an. Governing China’s local officials:An analysis of promotion tournament model [J] . Economic Research Journal, 2007(7): 36-50.
[19] 李祯琪, 欧国立. 激励性和惩罚性交通拥堵治理政策的比较——基于动态演化博弈模型及仿真分析 [J] . 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 167-178.Li Zhenqi, Ou Guoli. Comparison of incentive and punitive traffic congestion policies——Based on the dynamic evolutionary game model and simulation analysis [J] . Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(6): 167-178.
[20] 徐浩, 谭德庆, 张敬钦等. 群体性突发事件非利益相关者羊群行为的演化博弈分析 [J] . 管理评论, 2019, 31(5): 254-266.Xu Hao, Tan Deqing, Zhang Jingqin, et al. Evolutionary game analysison herding behavior of non-direct Stakeholders in mass emergencies [J] . Management Review, 2019, 31(5): 254-266.
[21] 刘伟夏, 立秋. 网络借贷市场参与主体行为策略的演化博弈均衡分析——基于三方博弈的视角 [J] . 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(5): 169-177.Liu Weixia, Li Qiu. Analysis on the behavioral strategy of participants on online lending market based on evolutionary game theory——A trilateral game perspective [J] . Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(5): 169-177.
[22] 汪明月, 刘宇, 杨文珂. 环境规制下区域合作减排演化博弈研究 [J] . 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 158-169.Wang Mingyue, Liu Yu, Yang Wenke. Evolutionary game analysis of regional cooperative emission reduction under environmental regulation [J] . Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(2): 158-169.
[23] 郭本海, 李军强, 张笑腾. 多主体参与下中国光伏产业低端技术锁定突破问题研究 [J] . 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2017, 19(4): 18-27.Guo Ben hai,Li Junqiang, Zhang Xiaoteng. Research on low-tech lock breakthrough issue of China’s photovoltaic industry involving several participants [J] . Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2017, 19(4): 18-27.
[24] 王先甲, 夏可. 多人雪堆演化博弈在愿景驱动规则下的扩展平均丰度函数 [J] . 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(5): 1128-1136.Wang Xianjia, Xia Ke. Extended average abundance function of multi-player snowdrift evolutionary game under aspiration driven rule [J] . Systems Engineering– Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(5): 1128-1136.
[25] 徐岩, 胡斌, 钱任. 基于随机演化博弈的战略联盟稳定性分析和仿真 [J] . 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(5): 920-926.Xu Yan, Hu Bin, Qian Ren. Analysis on stability of strategic alliances based on stochastic evolutionary game including simulations [J] . Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice,2011, 31(5): 920-926.
[26] 孙华丽, 王循庆, 薛耀锋. 基于不同情景的群体性突发事件随机演化博弈模型 [J] . 运筹与管理, 2016, 25(4): 23-30.Sun Huali, Wang Xunqing, Xue Yaofeng. Stochastic evolutionary game model for unexpected incidents involving mass participation based on different scenarios [J] . Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(4): 23-30.
[27] Baker C T H, Buckwar E. Exponential stability in p-th mean of solutions, and of convergent Euler-type solutions, of stochastic delay differential equations [J] . Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2005, 184(2): 404-427.

Stochastic Evolutionary Game Analysis of Multiple Supervision Paths of Enterprise R&D Manipulation

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0