新产品开发网络资源与技术资源匹配关系:基于中国制造业企业的实证研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.04.017

Abstract

Abstract: In the background of new technological revolution, the requirements of breadth and depth for resources in new product development are increasing. The Matching combination of different resources has played a direct and decisive role for the success of new product development. By combining the resource based view and social network theory, the effects of varying degrees of combination of network-technology resources on the market performance/risk of enterprises' new product development are intensively investigated, and the adjustment effect of product diversification on the relationship between the combination of network-technology resources and the market performance/risk of new product development is explored. By using the survey data from 143 Chinese manufacturing enterprises structural equation modeling and hierarchical regression analyzes method are utilized, an empirical study is conducted and then the results are obtained as follows: the combination of network resources breadth-technology resources depth and network resources depth-technology resources breadth have positive impacts on the market performance and negative ones on the risk of new product development; the combination of network resources breadth-technology resources breadth and network resources depth-technology resources depth have negative impacts on the market performance and positive ones on the risk of new product development; the product diversification has positive impacts on the adjustment of the relationship between the combination of network resources breadth-technology resources depth and the risk of new product development, and it also has positive impacts on the adjustment of the relationship between the combination of network resources breadth-technology resources breadth and the market performance/risk of new product development. This study provides a theoretical basis and decision support for the enterprises to improve the efficiency of resources allocation and reduce the risk of new product development.

Key words: new product development, network resources, technology resources, matching relationship, product diversification

CLC Number:

F273.2

YAO Zheng, MA Chao-qun, YANG Zhi. Matching Relationship between Network Resources and Technology Resources of New Product Development: EmpiricalStudy Based on Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(4): 148-158.

References

[1] 杰里米·里夫金. 第三次工业革命: 新经济模式如何改变世界[M]. 张体伟, 孙豫宁, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2012.

[2] 约瑟夫·阿洛伊斯·熊彼特. 经济发展理论: 对利润、资本、信贷、利息和经济周期的探究[M]. 叶华, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2009.

[3] Teece D J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing[J]. Research Policy, 1986, 15(6): 285-305.

[4] Teece D J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets[J]. California Management Review, 1998, 40(3): 55-79.

[5] Cooper L P. A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: A practitioner perspective[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2003, 20(1-2): 117-140.

[6] Eisenhardt K M, Martin J A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11): 1105-1121.

[7] Song M, Parry M E. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes:Japan and the United States[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1997, 61(2): 1-18.

[8] Li Haiyang, Atuahene-Gima K. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(6): 1123-1134.

[9] Chesbrough H W. The era of open innovation: The way in which organizations generate ideas and bring them to market[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, 44(3): 35-41.

[10] Jarillo J C. On strategic networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9(1): 31-41.

[11] Dyer J H, Hatch N W. Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(8): 701-719.

[12] Koka B R, Prescott J E. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(6): 639-661.

[13] Ansoff H I. Strategies for diversification[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1957, 35(5): 113-124.

[14] 吴伟伟, 邓强, 于渤. 技术能力对新产品开发绩效的影响: 以技术管理为调节变量[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(3): 429-435.

[15] 姚山季, 王永贵. 顾客参与新产品开发及其绩效影响: 关系嵌入的中介机制[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012, 26(4): 39-48.

[16] 秦剑. 研发/制造/营销跨职能整合与新产品开发: 产品创新性的差异效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(1): 130-138.

[17] Calantone R J, Benedetto C A, Schmidt J B. Using the analytic hierarchy process in new product screening[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1999, 16(1), 65-76.

[18] Chen H H, Lee A H I, Tong Yunhuan. Prioritization and operations NPD mix in a network with strategic partners under uncertainty[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2007, 33(2):337-346.

[19] Gatignon H, Xuereb J M. Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34(1): 77-90.

[20] Mullins J W, Sutherland D J. New product development in rapidly changing markets: An exploratory study[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1998, 15(3): 224-236.

[21] Kahraman C, Büyüközkan G, Ate? N Y. A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction[J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(7): 1567-1582.

[22] Ogawa S, Piller F T. Reducing the risks of new product development[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2006, 47(2): 65-72.

[23] Penrose E T.The theory of the growth of the firm[M]. New York: Blackwell, 1959.

[24] Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120.

[25] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2): 171-180.

[26] Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Arregle J L, et al. The dynamic interplay of capability strengths and weaknesses: Investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(13): 1386-1409.

[27] Song M, Droge C, Hanvanich S, et al.Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(3): 259-276.

[28] Stieglitz N, Heine K. Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(1): 1-15.

[29] Emirbayer M, Goodwin J. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1994, 99(6): 1411-1454.

[30] Laumann E O, Galaskiewicz J, Marsden P V. Community structure as interorganizational linkages[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1978, 4: 455-484.

[31] Gulati R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(4): 293-317.

[32] Dyer J H, Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(4): 660-679.

[33] Mouzas S. Marketing action in networks[J]. European Journal of Marketing, 2006, 40(11): 1271-1291.

[34] Kogut B B, Shan W, Walker G. The make or cooperate decision in the context of an industry network[M]. Nohria N and Eccles R. Networks and organizations Boston Harvard Business School Press, 1992.

[35] Dutta S, Narasimhan O M, Rajiv S.Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(3): 277-285.

[36] Hunt S D, Morgan R M. The comparative advantage theory of competition[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(2): 1-15.

[37] Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(5): 397-420.

[38] Pisano G P. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 153-176.

[39] Katila R, Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6): 1183-1194.

[40] Wang Qing, Tunzelmann N. Complexity and the functions of the firm: breadth and depth[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(7-8): 805-818.

[41] Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.

[42] Bianchi P, Bellini N. Public policies for local networks of innovators[J]. Research Policy, 1991, 20(5): 487-497.

[43] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(4): 291-309.

[44] Montgomery C A, Wernerfelt B. Diversification, ricardian rents, and Tobin's q[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1988, 19(4): 623-632.

[45] Huang Yifen, Chen C J. The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation[J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(7-8): 420-428.

[46] Miller D J. Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(7): 601-619.

[47] Ramanujam V, Varadarajan P. Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(6): 523-551.

[48] Kim W C, Hwang P, Burgers W P. Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(1): 45-57.

[49] Miller D. Thestructural and environmental correlates of business strategy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1987, 8(1): 55-76.

Matching Relationship between Network Resources and Technology Resources of New Product Development: EmpiricalStudy Based on Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 1

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10