基于情感反应的组织即兴成因机理研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在不断变化的竞争环境中,企业快速成长能力更多地依赖于临场应变的组织即兴。组织即兴往往是由情境变化所激发的组织情感反应,进而激活组织记忆和偏离原组织行动模式、并不断地适应新环境的组织活动,同时。本文剖析了组织情感与组织即兴行动之间关系,建立了组织情感会触发组织活动的即兴生成模型。模型研究发现,情感反应与组织行动之间的趋同性、组织情感反应的强度、以及改变行动的努力程度影响着组织即兴活动产生。最后,以星巴克的创新性活动为例进一步证实,组织即兴是组织情境激发的情感力所驱动的集体行动。

关键词: 组织即兴, 情感反应, 认知努力, 组织行动

Abstract: In high uncertain environment, quick growth of firms mainly depends on the capabilities of flexible responses, and emotional arousal in the very situations underlies organizational improvising. Organizational improvisation may be a series of coherent actions driven by organizational emotion which continually try to activate organizational memory and deviate from the previous organizational cognitive mode. First, the relationship of organizational emotion and organizational improvisation is discussed and thus the corresponding generation model is built. The findings suggest that the convergence between organizational emotional reactions and activities, the intensity of emotional reactions and the efforts of organizational shifts can arouse extemporaneous activities. At last, the statement that organizational improvisation is a series of coherent actions driven by organizational emotion is revified by a case study.

Key words: organizational improvisation, emotional reactions, cognitive efforts, organizational actions

中图分类号:

C931

潘安成, 李笑男. 基于情感反应的组织即兴成因机理研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, (4): 185-192.

PAN An-cheng, LI Xiao-nan. The Formation of Organizational Improvisation: An Emotional Reaction View[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, (4): 185-192.

参考文献

[1] Barrett F J. Coda: Creativity and improvisation in organizations for organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1998,9(5): 605-622.
[2] 潘安成, 邹媛春. 企业创业性决策中"走一步看一步"行为模型研究 [J].中国管理科学, 2009, 17(S): 588-593.
[3] Hatch M J. Jazz as a metaphor for organizing in the 21st century [J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9(5): 556-557.
[4] Miner A, Bassoff P, Moorman C. Organizational improvisation and learning: a field study [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2001,46(2): 304-337.
[5] Crossan M, Cunha M P, Vera D, Cunha J. Time and organizational improvisation [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2005, 30(1): 129-145.
[6] Moorman C, Miner A S. The convergence of planning and execution: improvisation, in new product development [J]. Journal of Marketing, 1998, 61: 1-20.
[7] Weick K E. The collapse of sense making in organization: The Mann Gulch disaster [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1993, 38: 628-652.
[8] Pascale R T. The Honda effect excerpted from perspectives on strategy: the real story behind Honda’s success. California Management Review, 1984, 26: 47-72.
[9] Ezzamel M, Willmott H. Strategy and strategizing: A poststructuralist perspective [J]. Advances in Strategic Management, 2010, 27: 75-109.
[10] Brown J S, Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation [J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 40-57.
[11] Tyre M J, Orlikowski W J. Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations[J]. Organization Science, 1994, 5(1): 98-118.
[12] Leonard-Barton D A. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization [J]. Research Policy, 1988, 17(2): 251-267.
[13] Vera D, Crossan M. Theatrical improvisation: lessons for organizations [J]. Organization Studies, 2004, 25(5): 727-749.
[14] Kisfalvi V, Pitcher P. Doing what feels right[J]. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2003, 12(1): 42-66.
[15] Cunha M, Cunha J. To plan and not to plan: toward a synthesis between planning and learning [J]. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 2002, 5(3): 299-315.
[16] Barsade S G. The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2002, 47: 644-675.
[17] Barsade S G, Ramarajan L, Westen D. Implicit affect in organizations [J]. Research in Organizational Behavior, 2009, 29: 135-162.
[18] Tanghe J, Wisse B, van der Flier H. The formation of group affect and team effectiveness: the moderating role of identification [J]. British Journal of Management, 2010, 21: 340-358.
[19] Meyer A. Organizing for improvisation: The backstage story of the Vancouver Jazz concert and symposium [J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9(5): 569-576.
[20] Vera D, Crossan M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams [J]. Organization Science, 2005,16(3): 203-224.
[21] Weick K E. Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis [J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9(5): 543-555.
[22] Barrett F J. Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: implications for organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1988, 9(5): 605-622.
[23] Peplowski K. The process of improvisation [J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9(5): 560-561.
[24] Pasmore W A. Organizing for jazz[J]. Organization Science, 1998, 9(5): 562-568.
[25] Crossan M, Sorrenti M. Making sense of improvisation[J]. Advances in Strategic Management, 1997, 14: 155-180.
[26] Kyriakopoulos K. Improvisation in product innovation: the contingent role of market information sources and memory types [J].Organization Studies, 2011, 32(8): 1051-1078.
[27] Mirvis P H. Practive improvisation [J].Organization Science, 1998, 9(5): 586-592.
[28] Hatch M J. Exploring the empty spaces of organizing: how improvisational Jazz helps redescribe organizational structure [J]. Organization Studies, 1999, 20:75-100.
[29] Ciborra C U. Notes on improvisation and time in organizations [J]. Accounting Management and Information Technoligies, 1999, (9): 77-94.
[30] Callahan J L, McCollum E E. Conceptualizations of emotion research in organizational contexts [J]. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 2002, 4: 4-21.
[31] Jones G R. Psychological orientation and the process of organizational socialization: An interactionist perspective [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1983, 8(3): 464-474.
[32] Schwarz N, Clore G L. How do I feel about it ? Informative functions of affective states[M]// Fiedler K, Forgas J. Affect, Cognition and Social Behavior. Toronto Canada: Hogrefe International, 1988: 44-62.
[33] Mills T, Kleinman S. Emotions,reflexivity, and action: an interactionist analysis[J]. Social Forces, 1988, 66(4): 1009-1027.
[34] Rosenberg M. Reflexivity and emotions [J].Social Psychology Quarterly, 1990, 53(1): 3-12.
[35] Hofstede G. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind [M]. London: MeGraw-Hill, 1991.
[36] Keele L, Wolak J. Contextual sources of ambivalence[J]. Political Psychology, 2008, 29(8): 653-673.
[37] Garland E L. Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology [J].Clinical Psychology Review,2010,30: 849-864.
[38] Casciaro T. Lobo M S. When competence is irrelevant: the role of interpersonal affect in task-related ties[J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 2008, 53: 655-684.
[39] Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development[J].Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13: 111-125.
[40] Bastien D T, Hostager T J. Cooperation as communicative accomplishment: A symbolic interaction analysis of an improvised jazz concert[J].Communication Studies, 1992, 43: 92-104.
[41] Kamoche K, Cunha M. Minimal structures: from Jazz improvisation to product innovation [J].Organization Studies, 2001, 22(5): 733-764.
[42] Brown S L, Eisenhardt K M. The art of continuous change: linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 1-34.