需求替代情形下反应能力的价值分析

中国管理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 175-184.

• 论文 • 上一篇

需求替代情形下反应能力的价值分析

叶涛锋¹, 达庆利²

1. 江苏科技大学经济管理学院, 江苏镇江 212003;
2. 东南大学经济管理学院, 江苏南京 211189

收稿日期:2011-07-12 修回日期:2012-03-05 出版日期:2012-06-29 发布日期:2012-07-05
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(70801033)

On the Value of Reactive Capacity under Demand Substitution

YE Tao-feng¹, DA Qing-li²

1. School of Economics & Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China;
2. School of Economics & Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China

Received:2011-07-12 Revised:2012-03-05 Online:2012-06-29 Published:2012-07-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文通过对竞争报童模型加以拓展以研究需求替代情形下企业运用反应能力产生的价值。文中考虑了两种不同的需求结构:第一种中企业总需求是竞争双方库存量的分段线性函数,第二种中企业总需求的均值是双方库存水平任意形式的函数。根据需求结构的不同,建立了不同的库存竞争模型并提出了相应的均衡库存策略。基于这些均衡结论,进一步探讨了反应能力的价值。分析表明运用反应能力能在降低企业库存水平的同时提高顾客服务水平。此外,在不同的需求结构下,运用反应能力产生的价值均随可用反应能力以及缺货惩罚成本递增,而随单位反应能力的使用成本递减。

关键词: 反应能力, 需求替代, 库存竞争, 价值

Abstract: Certain extensions of the competitive newsvendor model are presented in this paper in an attempt to investigate the value of using reactive capacities under demand substitution. Two demand structures are considered here: the former denotes total demand as a piece-wise linear function of inventory levels for the two firms, and the latter holds that the mean of the total demand is an arbitrary function of stocking quantities for the two firms. In accordance with demand structures, two inventory-based competition models are formulated and corresponding equilibrium inventory policies are developed. Then, based on the relevant equilibrium results, values of reactive capacity are derived. It is identified that the firm can simultaneously lower its inventory level and increase the customer service level by applying reactive capacity. Besides, under different demand structures, the value of applying reactive capacity increases along with the reactive capacity level and the unit shortage penalty cost, but decreases with the unit cost of reactive capacity.

Key words: reactive capacity, demand substitution, inventory competition, value

中图分类号:

F273

叶涛锋, 达庆利. 需求替代情形下反应能力的价值分析 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(3): 175-184.

YE Tao-feng, DA Qing-li. On the Value of Reactive Capacity under Demand Substitution[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, 20(3): 175-184.

参考文献

[1] Fisher M, Hammond J, Obermeyer W, et al. Making supply meet demand in an uncertain world [J]. Harward Business Review, 1994, 72(3): 83-93.
[2] Birtwistle G, Fiorito S S. Moore C M. Supplier perceptions of quick response systems [J]. Journal of Enterprise Information System, 2006, 19(3): 334-345.
[3] Fisher M, Hammond J, Obermeyer W, et al. Configuring a supply chain to reduce the cost of demand uncertainty [J]. Production and Operations Management, 1997, 6(3): 211-225.
[4] Parlar M. Game theoretic analysis of the substitutable product inventory problem with random demand [J]. Naval Research Logistics, 1988, 35: 397-429.
[5] Wang Qinan, Parlar M. A three-person game theory model arising in stochastic inventory control theory [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1994, 76: 83-97.
[6] Mahajan S, van Ryzin G. Inventory competition under dynamic consumer choice [J]. Operations Research, 2001, 49(5): 646-657.
[7] Avsar Z, Baykal-Gǘrsoy M. Inventory control under substitutable demand: a stochastic game application [J]. Naval Research Logistics, 2002, 49: 359-375.
[8] Netessine S, Rudi N. Centralized and competitive inventory models with demand substitution [J]. Operations Research, 2003, 51(2): 329-335.
[9] 苏兵, 徐渝, 陈金亮, 等. 单周期二人博弈可替代产品库存模型的应用研究 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, 13(1): 53-59.
[10] Netessine S, Zhang F. Positive vs. negative externalities in inventory management: implications for supply chain design [J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2005, 7(1): 58-73.
[11] 侯琳琳, 邱菀华. 混合渠道的易逝品分销系统的库存竞争 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2009, 29(2): 44-52.
[12] Netessine S, Rudi N, Wang Y. Inventory competition and incentives to back-order [J]. IIE Transactions, 2006, 38: 883-902.
[13] Li Qing, Ha A Y. Reactive capacity and inventory competition under demand substitution [J]. IIE Transactions, 2008, 40: 707-717.
[14] Caro F, Martinez-de-Albeniz V. The impact of quick response in inventory-based competition [J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2010, 12(3): 409-429.

[1]	张博, 扈文秀, 杨熙安. 投资者情绪生成机理的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 185-195.
[2]	杨皖苏, 杨善林, 杨希. 主动性-被动性员工创新行为:基于分布式领导的作用机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 182-192.
[3]	王治莹, 聂慧芳, 杨学亮. 考虑公众感知价值的突发性抢购事件演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 71-79.
[4]	周利, 易行健. 房价上涨、家庭债务与城镇居民消费:贷款价值比的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 80-89.
[5]	姜宝, 李秋实, 李剑. 航运供应链上的品牌价值、公平关切与契约协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1): 101-112.
[6]	孙立缘, 罗建强, 杨慧. 面向价值共创的服务衍生供需决策优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 160-168.
[7]	韩菁, 蔡寻, 滕新玉. 价值与风险感知对好评返现行为影响的演化分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 205-216.
[8]	柴尚蕾, 周鹏. 基于非参数Copula-CVaR模型的碳金融市场集成风险测度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 1-13.
[9]	曹裕, 易超群, 万光羽. 基于“搭便车”行为的双渠道供应链库存竞争和促销策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 106-115.
[10]	吴隽, 徐迪. 基于Shapley值法的商务模式创新价值分享[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 191-205.
[11]	江积海, 王烽权. O2O商业模式的创新导向:效率还是价值?——基于O2O创业失败样本的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 56-69.
[12]	樊双蛟, 王旭坪. 考虑退货的定价和订货优化及信息发布美化策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 116-127.
[13]	郭影, 孟庆春, 戎晓霞. 基于临期回收和响应供给策略的易逝性应急物资库存决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 127-137.
[14]	李友东, 夏良杰, 王锋正. 基于产品替代的低碳供应链博弈与协调模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 66-76.
[15]	郭本海, 储佳娜, 赵荧梅. 核心企业主导下乳制品全产业链质量管控GERT网络模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 120-130.

需求替代情形下反应能力的价值分析

On the Value of Reactive Capacity under Demand Substitution

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10