主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 207-216.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0898

• 论文 • 上一篇    

考虑质量不确定的竞争企业预售策略分析

孙晓杰1, 高峰2, 张建雄2   

  1. 1.西南交通大学经济管理学院,四川 成都610031; 2.天津大学管理与经济学部,天津300072
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-08 修回日期:2022-03-23 发布日期:2023-04-03
  • 通讯作者: 张建雄(1979-),男(汉族),湖南长沙人,天津大学管理与经济学部,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:供应链管理,Email: jxzhang@tju.edu.cn. E-mail:jxzhang@tju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(72201217,71971152);教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(21XJC630011)

Advance Selling Strategies of Competing Firms with Quality Uncertainty

SUN Xiao-jie1, GAO Feng2, ZHANG Jian-xiong2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China;2. College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2021-05-08 Revised:2022-03-23 Published:2023-04-03
  • Contact: 张建雄 E-mail:jxzhang@tju.edu.cn

摘要: 近年来,越来越多的企业在向市场推出新产品时采用预售方式。本文研究企业在面对竞争时的预售策略,其中消费者对企业所销售的异质可替代产品的质量估值具有不确定性。在预售期消费者不了解产品的真实质量,而在现货期消费者可以根据预售期购买者提供的线上产品评论对产品质量进行贝叶斯更新。策略型消费者通过比较在预售期和现货期购买产品的期望效用,选择提前购买或推迟购买。研究结果表明,若产品评论信息精确度较低,当市场竞争强度处于中等水平时,竞争企业双方在预售策略上不一致;否则,企业双方均采取预售。若产品评论信息精确度较高,则市场竞争强度对系统的影响较弱,因此竞争企业双方均有更强意愿采取预售。由此可见,在市场竞争环境下,预售并不总是给企业带来利好。

关键词: 预售;策略型消费者;竞争;定价

Abstract: In recent years, an increasing number of firms adopt advance selling when launching new products to the market. The advance selling strategies of two competing firms are studied, and it is assumed that consumers are uncertain about the quality valuation of heterogeneous substitutable products sold by the two firms. In the advance selling period, consumers do not know the real quality of products, while in the spot period, consumers can Bayesian update their valuations of the product quality according to online product reviews provided by buyers in the advance selling period. Strategic consumers choose to buy in advance or postpone by comparing the expected utilities of buying products in the advance selling period and the spot period. The competitive relationship between the two firms is described through a Hotelling linear model, and a game model between strategic consumers and firms is developed. Based on the modeling, solution, and analysis of three cases (neither of the two firms adopts advance selling, only one firm adopts advance selling, and both firms adopt advance selling), the following main conclusions are obtained. If the product review information accuracy is low, when the market competition intensity is medium, the two firms cannot reach a consensus on the advance selling strategy; otherwise, both firms will adopt advance selling. If the product review information accuracy is high, the impact of market competition intensity on the system will be weakened, and thus both firms are more likely to adopt advance selling. Therefore, adopting advance selling does not always benefit firms in a competitive marketplace.

Key words: advance selling; strategic consumer; duopoly; pricing

中图分类号: