考虑决策者偏好的均衡接近度灰关联改进TOPSIS动态评价方法及其应用研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2224

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了比较多个待评价对象在某一时间段内各个时刻和总体优劣水平，需要进行动态评价。针对TOPSIS和灰色关联度法优缺点，加入时间维度，提出考虑决策者偏好的均衡接近度灰关联改进TOPSIS动态评价方法，该方法同时反映了待评价对象与理想方案的位置关系以及数据曲线的相似程度，可以避免局部点关联倾向。可以同时兼顾存量和增量，得到各时刻及该时间段各待评价对象总体评价结果。根据决策者对位置和形状的偏好程度以及存量和增量偏好程度不同，对相应参数取不同值。将该方法应用于2013-2017年期间我国东部地区各省市高质量发展评价以验证本文所提方法的有效性。

关键词: 灰色关联度；均衡接近度；动态评价方法；偏好；高质量发展

Abstract: In order to compare the various moments and overall pros and cons of multiple evaluated objects in a certain period of time, dynamic evaluation is required. Aiming at the advantages and disadvantages of TOPSIS and gray correlation method, the time dimension is taken into account, and then a dynamic evaluation method based on grey correlational analysis by the method of balance and approach and improved TOPSIS considering the preference of the decision maker is proposed. This method is able to reflect the positional relationship and curve relationship between ideal solution and alternatives simultaneously, and avoid the problem of local point association tendency. Moreover, both inventory and increment can be taken into consider at the same time, and the overall evaluation result of each object to be evaluated at each moment and time period can be obtained. According to the preference of decision maker to positional relationship and curve relationship, different parameter can be determined. Finally, an empirical analysis of high-quality economic development is used to verify the effectiveness and advantages of the proposed method.

Key words: grey relational degree; degree of balance and approach; dynamic evaluation method; preference; high-quality development

中图分类号:

C931

徐林明,李美娟,卢锦呈. 考虑决策者偏好的均衡接近度灰关联改进TOPSIS动态评价方法及其应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(3): 251-258.

XU Lin-ming,LI Mei-juan,LU Jin-cheng. Dynamic Evaluation Method Based on Grey Correlational Analysis by the Method of Balance and Approach and Improved TOPSIS Considering the Preference of the Decision Maker[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(3): 251-258.

参考文献

［1］李美娟, 陈国宏, 林志炳, 等. 基于理想解法的动态评价方法研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10): 156-161.Li Meijuan, Chen Guohong, Lin Zhibing, et al. Dynamic evaluation method based TOPSIS［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(10): 156-161.
［2］ Hwang C L,Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications［M］. New York: Springer-Verlag.1981.
［3］ Yoon K. A reconciliation among discrete compromise situations［J］. Journal of Operational Research Society. 1987,38(3): 277-286.
［4］ Lai Youngjou, Liu Tingyun, Hwang C L. TOPSIS for MODM［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 1994, 76(3): 486-500.
［5］ Behzadian M, Otaghsara S K, Yazdani M, et al. A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications［J］. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(17): 13051-13069.
［6］ Ahmad Zareie, Amir Sheikhahmadi, Keyhan Khamforoosh. Influence maximization in social networks based on TOPSIS［J］. Expert Systems With Applications, 2018, 108: 96-107.
［7］匡海波,刘天寿,刘家国,等.基于PCA-TOPSIS的自贸区开放水平测度研究［J］.科研管理,2018,39(3): 69-79.Kuang Haibo, Liu Tianshou, Liu Jiaguo, et al. A research on the open level of foreign trade zone based on PCA-TOPSIS［J］. Science Research Management, 2018, 19(3): 69-79.
［8］ Tayal A, Singh S P. Integrated SA-DEA-TOPSIS-based solution approach for multi objective stochastic dynamic facility layout problem［J］. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 2017, 11(1-2): 82-100.
［9］朱佳翔,蔡建飞,林徐勋.基于CITOPSIS的梯形直觉模糊多准则群决策分类方法［J］.中国管理科学,2018,26(9):148-157.Zhu Jiaxiang, Cai Jianfei, Lin Xuxun. Multiple criteria sorting method in the group decision making context with trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy values based on CI-TOPSIS［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018,26(9): 148-157.
［10］曾守桢,穆志民.基于混合加权距离的毕达哥拉斯模糊TOPSIS多属性决策方法研究［J］.中国管理科学,2019,27(3):198-205.Zeng Shouzhen, Mu Zhimin. A method based on hybrid weighted distance for Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS multiple-attribute decision making［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3): 198-205.
［11］ Hashem Omrani, Arash Alizadeh, Ali Emrouznejad. Finding the optimal combination of power plants alternatives: A multi response Taguchi-neural network using TOPSIS and fuzzy best-worst method［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production,2018, 203: 210-223.
［12］ Gourav Dwivedi, Rajiv K Srivastava, Samir K Srivastava. A generalised fuzzy TOPSIS with improved closeness coefficient［J］. Expert Systems With Applications, 2018, 96: 185-195.
［13］ Rostamzadeh R, Ghorabaee M K, Govindan K, et al.. Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-CRITIC approach［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 175: 651-669.
［14］ Liu Dong, Qi Xiaochen, Fu Qiang, et al. A resilience evaluation method for a combined regional agricultural water and soil resource system based on Weighted Mahalanobis distance and a Gray-TOPSIS model［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 229(20): 667-679.
［15］ Chen Meifang, Tzeng G H. Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country［J］. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 2004, 40(13): 1473-1490.
［16］ Gu Hui, Song Bifeng. Study on effectiveness evaluation of weapon systems based on grey relational analysis and TOPSIS［J］. Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2009, 20(1): 106-111.
［17］孙晓东,焦玥,胡劲松.基于灰色关联度和理想解法的决策方法研究［J］.中国管理科学, 2005, (4): 63-68.Sun Xiaodong, Jiao Yue, Hu Jinsong. Research on decision-making method based on gray correlation degree and TOPSIS［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2005(4): 63-68.
［18］吴飞美,李美娟,徐林明,等.基于理想解和灰关联度的动态评价方法及其应用研究［J］.中国管理科学,2019,27(12):136-142.Wu Feimei, Li Meijuan, Xu Linming, et al. Dynamic evaluation method based on TOPSIS and gray correlation degree and its application［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(12): 136-142.
［19］郭亚军. 综合评价理论、方法及应用［M］. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.Guo Yajun. Comprehensive evaluation theory, method and application ［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.
［20］易平涛,周义,郭亚军,等.一种体现发展趋势的动态综合评价方法［J］.运筹与管理,2016,25(6):175-180.Yi Pingtao, Zhou Yi, Guo Yajun, et al. A dynamic comprehensive evaluation method embodying development tendency［J］. Operations Research and Management Science, 2016, 25(6): 175-180.
［21］易平涛,李伟伟,郭亚军.动态不确定评价问题的随机聚合求解及应用［J］.系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(5): 1278-1286.Yi Pingtao, Li Weiwei, Guo Yajun. Stochastic clustered solution for dynamic uncertain evaluation questions and the application［J］. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(5): 1278-1286.
［22］张发明,肖文星.混合信息下的动态双激励评价机制设计及应用［J］.中国管理科学,2017, 25(12):138-146.Zhang Faming, Xiao Wenxing. Design of dynamic double incentive evaluation mechanism and its application under mixed information［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(12): 138-146.
［23］刘微微, 石春生, 赵圣斌. 具有速度特征的动态综合评价模型［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(3): 705-710.Liu Weiwei, Shi Chunsheng, Zhao Shengbin. Dynamic comprehensive evaluation model with the feature of speed［J］. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(3): 705-710.
［24］王欣荣, 樊治平. 上市公司财务状况的动态多指标综合评价方法［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2002, 22(4): 54-57+140.Wang Xinrong, Fan Zhiping. Dynamic multiple index synthetical evaluation for financial condition of public corporations［J］. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2002, 22(4): 54-57+140.
［25］李美娟, 李晓轩, 徐林明. 基于改进理想解法的动态评价方法研究［J］. 系统科学与数学, 2016, 36(10): 1659-1669.Li Meijuan, Li Xiaoxuan, Xu Linming. Dynamic evaluation method based on improved TOPSIS［J］. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2016, 36(10): 1659-1669.
［26］徐林明，李美娟，戴前智.基于灰靶理论的动态评价方法［J］.系统科学与数学，2017，37(1)：112-124.Xu Linming, Li Meijuan, Dai Qianzhi. Dynamic evaluation method based on grey target［J］. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2017, 37(1): 112-124.
［27］徐林明,林志炳,李美娟,等.基于模糊Borda法的动态组合评价方法及其应用研究［J］.中国管理科学,2017,25(2):165-173.Xu Linming, Lin Zhibing, Li Meijuan, et al. A dynamic combined evaluation method based on fuzzy borda and its application［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(2): 165-173.
［28］李美娟,徐林明,陈国宏.基于一致性的动态组合评价方法研究［J］.中国管理科学, 2016, 24(10):149-155.Li Meijuan, Xu Linming, Chen Guohong. A dynamic evaluation method based on consistency［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(10), 149-155.
［29］李美娟,徐林明.动态组合评价方法及其应用研究［M］.北京：科学出版社，2020.Li Meijuan, Xu Linming. Dynamic combined evaluation method ［M］. Beijing: Science Press, 2020.
［30］ Liu Jie, Guo Liang, Jiang Jiping, et al. Evaluation and selection of emergency treatment technology based on dynamic fuzzy GRA method for chemical contingency spills［J］. Journal of hazardous materials, 2015, 299: 306-315.
［31］张岐山,邓聚龙,邵勇.均衡接近度灰关联分析方法［J］.华中理工大学学报,1995(11):94-98.Zhang Qishan, Deng Julong, Shao Yong. A grey correlational analysis by the method of degree of balance and approach［J］. Journal Huazhong (Central China) University of Science and Technology, 1995(11): 94-98.
［32］李刚,李建平,孙晓蕾,等.兼顾序信息和强度信息的主客观组合赋权法研究［J］.中国管理科学,2017,25(12):179-187.Li Gang, Li Jianping, Sun Xiaolei, et al. Research on a combined method of subjective-objective weighting based on the ordered information and intensity information［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(12): 179-187.
［33］徐林明,李美娟.动态综合评价中的数据预处理方法研究［J］.中国管理科学,2020, 28(1):162-169.Xu Linming, Li Meijuan. A data preprocessing method in dynamic comprehensive evaluation［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(1): 162-169.

[1]	曹端阳, 张旭梅, 但斌. 考虑订单可拆分的第三方共享制造平台产能匹配策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 225-235.
[2]	冯宇, 党耀国, 王俊杰, 杨章程. 基于2-可加Choquet积分的混合信息灰关联决策方法及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 189-200.
[3]	戢守峰, 刘红玉, 王丽洁, 戢媛媛. PI环境下考虑保鲜努力的冷链产品生产-库存-运输联合优化模型与求解[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 166-176.
[4]	毛照昉, 袁锐莹, 张清然. 考虑捆绑销售的在线课程免费试听策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 238-249.
[5]	陈晓红, 杨志慧, 胡东滨. 数字化全渠道客户行为：研究热点与知识框架[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 1-10.
[6]	丁黎黎, 赵忠超, 张凯旋. 感知价值对个人碳账户绿色信贷发展的作用机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 344-355.
[7]	谷炜, 刘亚金, Lu Feng Susan, 闫相斌. 人工智能驱动管理决策：应用、感知与偏见[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 99-112.
[8]	刘嘉, 袁欣, 阮伟乔, 白晋宇. 呼吸道传染病疫情下地铁站行人感染风险控制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 236-246.
[9]	卞亦文, 程文超. 平台供应链线下渠道策略与运营模式选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 165-174.
[10]	苏兵, 耿雪韵, 姬浩, 徐阳, 郭清娥, 陈光会, 张娟. 需求点服务请求无法预知的应急物资配送路径选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 197-203.
[11]	巩在武, 阳佳琦. 考虑灾民心理的多周期应急物资调度不确定规划建模研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(3): 209-222.
[12]	柴一栋, 刘昊鑫, 姜元春, 刘业政. 基于重要性最大化与社区划分的图神经网络推荐系统对抗攻击方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(2): 95-104.
[13]	杨善林, 李霄剑, 莫杭杰, 张强, 唐孝安. 科技战略供应链的基本特征与关键科学问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(1): 1-13.
[14]	陈晓红, 许冠英, 徐雪松, 易国栋, 唐加乐, 刘天朔. 新质生产力视域下管理科学变革：内涵特征、现实挑战与发展路径[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(1): 14-21.
[15]	胡勋锋, 单而芳, 李登峰. 联盟结构和交流网络限制下合作博弈的Shapley值研究进展[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(1): 140-152.