GAS-SKST-F模型及其在高频多元波动率预测中的应用

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1105

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 77-87.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1105

GAS-SKST-F模型及其在高频多元波动率预测中的应用

鲁万波, 亢晶浩

西南财经大学统计学院，四川成都611130

收稿日期:2019-07-28 修回日期:2020-03-04 出版日期:2022-01-20 发布日期:2022-01-29
通讯作者: 鲁万波(1977-)，男(汉)，贵州贵阳人，西南财经大学统计学院，教授、博士生导师，研究方向：金融计量、风险管理，Email：luwb@swufe.edu.cn. E-mail:luwb@swufe.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助面上项目(71771187)；国家自然科学基金国际合作交流项目(72011530149)；国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目(72163029)；西南财经大学“光华英才”百人计划；中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(JBK190602)

GAS-SKST-F Model and Its Application in High Frequency Multivariate Volatility Forecast

LU Wan-bo, KANG Jing-hao

School of Statistics, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China

Received:2019-07-28 Revised:2020-03-04 Online:2022-01-20 Published:2022-01-29
Contact: 鲁万波 E-mail:luwb@swufe.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 假定日收益率服从多元有偏学生t分布、已实现协方差矩阵服从矩阵F分布，本文构建了一种新的得分驱动模型：GAS-SKST-F模型。在该有偏厚尾多元波动率模型中，我们基于广义自回归得分(GAS)模型的基本思想对收益率和已实现协方差矩阵进行联合动态设定，协方差矩阵的更新过程依赖于收益率分布和已实现协方差矩阵分布联合似然函数的得分函数。已实现协方差测度在协方差矩阵的更新过程中发挥了重要的作用。基于20支上证50成分股高频数据的实证分析研究结果显示，与GAS-N-Wishart模型和GAS-tF模型相比，无论样本内还是样本外，GAS-SKST-F模型有着更加良好的样本内估计和样本外预测能力。

关键词: GAS-SKST-F模型, 多元有偏学生t分布, 多元波动率

Abstract: Modeling conditional dependency structure of financial assets through time-varying covariance is of great significance to capital risk management, option pricing and optimal portfolio. With the advent of high-frequency data, realized multivariate volatility model is widely applied in the financial field in recent years. Among the observation-driven models for time-varying parameters, the clear advantage of the generalized autoregressive score (GAS) model is that it exploits the complete density structure and likelihood information rather than theconditional moments information.

Key words: GAS-SKST-F model, multivariate skewed student t density, multivariate volatility

中图分类号:

F830.9

鲁万波, 亢晶浩. GAS-SKST-F模型及其在高频多元波动率预测中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 77-87.

LU Wan-bo, KANG Jing-hao. GAS-SKST-F Model and Its Application in High Frequency Multivariate Volatility Forecast[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(1): 77-87.

参考文献

［1］ Bauwens L, Laurent S, Rombouts J V K. Multivariate GARCH models: A survey［J］. Journal of Applied Econometrics,2006,21(1):79-109.
［2］ Andersen T G, Bollerslev T, Diebold F X, et al. Modeling and forecasting realized volatility［J］. Econometrica,2003,71(5): 579-625.
［3］ Engle R F, Gallo G M. A multiple indicators model for volatility using intra-daily data［J］. Journal of Econometrics,2006,131(3):3-27.
［4］ Shephard N, Sheppard K. Realising the future: forecasting with high-frequency-based volatility (HEAVY) models［J］. Journal of Applied Econometrics,2010,25(2):197-231.
［5］ Hansen P R, Huang Z, Shek H H. Realized GARCH: A joint model of returns and realized measures of volatility［J］. Journal of Applied Econometrics,2012,27(6):877-906.
［6］马锋,魏宇,黄登仕. 基于符号收益和跳跃变差的高频波动率模型［J］. 管理科学学报, 2017, 20(10):36-48.Ma Feng, Wei Yu, Huang Dengshi. Forecasting the realized volatility based on the signed return and signed jump variation［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China,2017, 20(10):36-48.
［7］吴鑫育,李心丹,马超群. 门限已实现随机波动率模型及其实证研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(3): 10-19.Wu Xinyu, Li Xindan, Ma Chaoqun. Threshold realized stochastic volatility model and its empirical test［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2017,25(3):10-19.
［8］ Golosnoy V, Gribisch B, Liesenfeld R. The conditional autoregressive wishart model for multivariate stock market volatility［J］. Journal of Econometrics,2012,167(1):211-223.
［9］ Paolo G, Hansen P R, Janus P, et al.Realized Wishart-GARCH: A score-driven multi-asset volatility model［J］. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2019, 17(1):1-32.
［10］ Opschoor A, Janus P, Lucas A, et al. New HEAVY models for fat-tailed realized covariances and returns［J］. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2018,36(4): 643-657.
［11］罗嘉雯, 陈浪南.多国股票市场的高频波动相关性研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(2):116-125.Luo Jiawen, Chen Langnan. The volatility co-movement of various stock markets based on high-frequency data［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science,2018,26(2):116-125.
［12］ Creal D, Koopman S J, André Lucas. Generalized autoregressive score models with applications［J］. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2013, 28(5):777-795.
［13］ Blasques F, Koopman S J, LucasA. Information theoretic optimality of observation driven time series models for continuous responses［J］. Biometrika, 2015, 102(2):325-343.
［14］ Lucas A, Schwaab B, Zhang X. Conditional Euro area sovereign default risk［J］. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2014, 32(2):271-284.
［15］ Creal D, Schwaab B, Koopman S, et al. Observation driven mixed measurement dynamic factor models with an application to credit risk［J］. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2014,96(5):898-915.
［16］王天一,黄卓.Realized GAS-GARCH及其在VaR预测中的应用［J］. 管理科学学报，2015, 18(5):79-86.Wang Tianyi, Huang Zhuo. Realized GAS-GARCH model and its application in Value-at-Risk forecast［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China,2015, 18(5):79-86.
［17］ Oh D H, Patton A J. Time-varying systemic risk:Evidence from a dynamic copula model of CDS spreads［J］. Journal of Business andEconomic Statistics, 2018, 36(2):181-195.
［18］沈根祥, 邹欣悦.已实现波动GAS-HEAVY模型及其实证研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1):1-10.Shen Genxiang, Zou Xinyue. GAS-HEAVY model for realized measures of volatility and returns［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(1):1-10.
［19］ Lambert P, Laurent S. Modelling financial time series using GARCH-type models with a skewed student distribution for the innovations［R］. Working Paper,Université de Liège, 2001.
［20］ Gao Chunting, Zhou Xiaohua. Forecasting VaR and ES using dynamic conditional score models and skew student distribution ［J］. Economic Modelling, 2016, 53:216-223.
［21］ Bauwens L, Laurent, S. A new class of multivariate skew densities with application to generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity models［J］.Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2005,23(3):346-354.
［22］ Blasques F, Koopman S J, Lucas A. Maximum likelihood estimation for score-driven models［R］. Working Paper, Tinbergen Institute, 2017.

[1]	刘超, 郭亚东. 多时间尺度下行业间系统性金融风险溢出及拓扑结构分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 46-59.
[2]	李霞, 李守伟. 基于EMD与DVG的非线性时间序列预测模型及其应用研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 275-286.
[3]	瞿慧, 沈微. 引入投资者关注的中国股市协方差预测——基于多元HAR类模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 9-19.
[4]	黄金波, 吴莉莉, 尤亦玲. 非对称Laplace分布下的均值-VaR模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 31-40.
[5]	蒋崇辉, 刘林. 惯性因子跟踪策略的有效性：来自中国股票市场的证据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 86-97.
[6]	朱莉, 刘向丽, 杨晓光. 投资者情绪影响股指期现货市场的价格动态关系吗？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 52-62.
[7]	黄金波, 陈伶茜, 丁杰. 企业社会责任、媒体报道与股价崩盘风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 1-12.
[8]	胡志军, 凌爱凡, 杨超. 我国A股市场的模糊性溢价——基于日内高频数据的分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 42-53.
[9]	向诚, 杨俊. 谁在市场中赌博？基金博彩行为研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(11): 224-236.
[10]	沈根祥，张靖泽. 条件异方差动态Nelson-Siegel利率期限结构模型及其应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 1-11.
[11]	陈文博, 陈浪南. 股市投资者对盈余公告的反应——基于博彩偏好的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(9): 1-11.
[12]	黄诒蓉, 白羽轩. 网络传染是“真羊群”还是“伪羊群”?——网络传染程度对资本市场定价效率的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(9): 12-24.
[13]	吴鑫育, 李心丹, 马超群. 基于期权与高频数据信息的VaR度量研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(8): 13-23.
[14]	齐岳, 廖科智. 商品金融化背景下商品期货的多样化收益研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 10-22.
[15]	王俊勇, 李心丹, 林良才. 新时代防控金融风险跨市场交叉网络传染机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(6): 23-35.

GAS-SKST-F模型及其在高频多元波动率预测中的应用

GAS-SKST-F Model and Its Application in High Frequency Multivariate Volatility Forecast

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10