主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 199-209.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.2369

• • 上一篇    

我国行业风险敞口与行业网络结构的相关性研究

盛积良1(),黄毅1,2,李居超1   

  1. 1.江西财经大学统计与数据科学学院, 江西 南昌 330013
    2.吉首大学数学与统计学院, 湖南 吉首 416000
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-15 修回日期:2022-03-08 出版日期:2024-02-25 发布日期:2024-03-06
  • 通讯作者: 盛积良 E-mail:shengjiliang@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71973056);国家自然科学基金重点项目(71531003)

Research on the Correlation Between Industry Risk and Industry Network Structure in China

Jiliang Sheng1(),Yi Huang1,2,Juchao Li1   

  1. 1.School of Statistics and Data Science, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
    2.College of Mathematics and Statistics, Jishou University, Jishou 416000, China
  • Received:2021-11-15 Revised:2022-03-08 Online:2024-02-25 Published:2024-03-06
  • Contact: Jiliang Sheng E-mail:shengjiliang@163.com

摘要:

基于皮尔逊相关系数和格兰杰因果检验,分别构建行业无向和有向网络,采用CoVaR模型计算我国行业风险,并借助分位数回归探索行业风险与网络结构的相互关系;使用网络模块分析探究不同极端事件下行业网络的集聚情况,以及风险在各模块间的传染路径,同时考察网络结构对行业风险的影响效应。研究结果表明:两种行业网络结构均表明,金融行业有成为网络中心的趋势,采用格兰杰因果检验构建的有向网络更能解释行业风险;金融市场冲击会对行业网络结构产生影响,不同极端事件下行业风险在网络中的传播方式不同;同时,网络结构对行业风险存在显著影响,网络聚类系数和全局效率的降低以及介数中心性的提升,均能降低行业风险。研究结论对金融风险防范和产业结构优化升级具有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 复杂网络, 网络结构, 风险敞口, 皮尔逊相关系数, 格兰杰因果检验

Abstract:

In recent years, financial markets have become extremely volatile, especially the global financial crisis in 2008 and the continued global plunge in global stock markets caused by the COVID-19 in 2020. This has drawn lots of attention from academia trying to measure systemic risks and grasp the system risk spread across sectors or markets. The complex relationship between financial markets and their internal elements is the carrier of systemic risk transmission, and their connectedness patterns or structures play an important role in the formation and infection process of systemic risks. For the interconnectedness within a market, once one sector encounters a risk shock, the risk will affect other sectors through strong linkages and contagion mechanisms, and even spread to the entire financial markets. China is currently in a critical period of supply-side reform and economic transformation. As international financial markets become increasingly connected, domestic financial market reforms are gradually deepening and financial innovations are changing rapidly. As the second largest market in the world, Chinese financial system is increasingly attracting attention from countries around the world following a series of liberalisation policies. Also note the unevenness of the development of China's financial sector and the differences in its contribution. In this context, investigation into the connectedness among financial markets and the systemic risk spillovers contagion mechanism across sectors or markets become important and necessary.Pearson correlation coefficients and Granger causality tests are used to construct undirected and directed industry networks, CoVaR models are used to calculate industry risk, and quantile regressions are combined with to explore the interrelationship between industry risk and network structure.With the help of module analysis, the clustering of industry networks under different extreme events and the transmission paths of risks between modules are analysed in depth, while the effect of network structure on industry exposures is examined. The results show that:Both industry networks show a tendency for finance to become the centre of the network, and the directed network constructed by Granger causality test can better explain industry risk. Financial market shocks can have an impact on the structure of industry networks, with different mechanisms for the spread of industry networks under different extreme events. There is also a significant impact of network structure on industry risk, with reductions in industry network clustering coefficients and global efficiency and increases in meso-centrality reducing industry exposure.The findings of this paper have a certain value of participation in financial risk prevention and industrial structure enhancement.

Key words: complex network, network structure, riskexposure, Pearson correlation coefficients, Granger causality test

中图分类号: