主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 23-31.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.05.003

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

多基本面下异质交易者竞争及流动性分析

刘霞1, 刘善存1, 张强2   

  1. 1. 北京航空航天大学经济管理学院, 北京 100191;
    2. 北京化工大学经济管理学院, 北京 100029
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-26 修回日期:2018-03-25 出版日期:2019-05-20 发布日期:2019-05-25
  • 通讯作者: 张强(1976-),男(满族),辽宁本溪人,北京化工大学经济管理学院,副教授,博士,研究方向:金融市场微观结构,E-mail:jqx_zhq@buaa.edu.cn E-mail:jqx_zhq@buaa.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371023,71371024,71771008);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(PTRW1808,XK1802-5)

Competition among Heterogeneously Informed Traders and Analysis of Market Liquidity

LIU Xia1, LIU Shan-cun1, ZHANG Qiang2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;
    2. The College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2017-09-26 Revised:2018-03-25 Online:2019-05-20 Published:2019-05-25

摘要: 假设风险资产出清价值由多个基本面组成,比较分析了同质与异质信息结构下交易者策略的相互作用及对市场的影响。结果发现:交易者人数增加所导致的竞争会提高市场流动性及市场信息效率,同时对同质交易者产生挤出效应和对异质交易者产生促进效应;异质知情交易者在私人信息质量方面的竞争则会加剧市场信息不对称程度,降低市场流动性;异质交易者间通过信息质量的竞争决定收益分配。理论上,市场流动性存在最佳状态。

关键词: 基本面, 异质交易者, 竞争, 促进效应, 市场流动性

Abstract: Liquidity is of vital importance to the financial market. Lots of previous research findings suggest that intensifying the competition among the investors is an efficient way to promote market liquidity. On the premise that the payoff of the traded risky asset is composed of only one fundamental, these papers mainly focus on the competition from the homogeneously informed traders on their private information. However, due to the fact of multiple-fundamental risk from the real market, the complex financial market with multiple-fundamental assumption has been studied by a growing number of scholars. This assumption may give rise to heterogeneously informed investors whose private information is on different fundamental and thus is not correlated. Considering that, a model is developed where the payoff of the traded asset consists of two independent fundamentals in a Kyle (1985) framework. Two types of multiple heterogeneously informed traders respectively possess private information on one of the two fundamentals. Combining multiple-fundamental assumption and heterogeneously informed trading, it is addressed whether the competition among heterogeneously informed traders exists and if so what its impact is on market liquidity and how it works. After analyzing the interaction effects between heterogeneously informed investors' trading strategy and its impact on market, it is concluded as follows. Firstly, an increase in the number of traders would promote market liquidity and information efficiency due to the competition among homogeneously informed investors. This competition generates a crowding-out effect on the trading intensity and expected profits of homogeneously informed investors, yet a promotion effect on that of heterogeneously informed investors. Secondly, the allocation of expected revenue between the two types of informed investors is determined by their competition on the quality of their own private information. That is, both the individual and group expected profits of each type of informed traders increase with the quality of his/their own information, whereas decrease with the other type's information precision. Besides, the competition on the private information of the heterogeneously informed investors would aggravate the information asymmetry and consequently reduce the liquidity but enhance the information efficiency. Specially, the above conclusions can generalize to the model of multiple (over two) fundamentals and multiple types of heterogeneously informed traders. Finally, the best state of market liquidity in theory is seeked for. Based on our results, regulators can control the access to the private information in the market to utilize the competition and promotion effects among heterogeneously informed traders to maximize market liquidity.

Key words: multiple fundamentals, heterogeneously informed traders, competition, promotion effect, market liquidity

中图分类号: