主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 125-135.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.1324

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于激励相容契约的ATO式供应链交叉协调研究

李毅鹏1, 马士华2, 袁开福3   

  1. 1. 中南财经政法大学信息与安全工程学院,湖北 武汉 430073;
    2. 华中科技大学管理学院, 湖北 武汉 430074;
    3. 贵州财经大学工商管理学院,贵州 贵阳 550025
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-15 修回日期:2019-05-07 发布日期:2021-06-29
  • 通讯作者: 李毅鹏(1980-),男(汉族),湖北武汉人,中南财经政法大学信息与安全工程学院,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向:供应链管理、信息管理,E-mail:liyipeng@zuel.edu.cn E-mail:liyipeng@zuel.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    新工科研究与实践项目(E-JSJRJ20201329);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2722020PY039,2722019JCT035);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71401180)

Research on Cross-Coordination of ATO Supply Chain under Incentive Compatibility Contract

LI Yi-peng1, MA Shi-hua2, YUAN Kai-fu3   

  1. 1. School of Information and Safety Engineering, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China;
    2. School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China;
    3. School of Business Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, China
  • Received:2018-09-15 Revised:2019-05-07 Published:2021-06-29

摘要: 考虑由两个零部件供应商与单个制造商组成的按订单装配式供应链中的信息不对称问题。以完全信息下各成员的利润作为基准,分析了成本类型信息占优的单个供应商"信息伪装"对纵向制造商和横向互补供应商所造成的损失,提出了基于激励相容的供应商-制造商纵向契约和横向互补供应商参与下的交叉协调契约。通过数学建模和仿真数据分析,研究表明:制造商主导的针对单个信息不对称供应商的激励契约,会产生"低端向下扭曲"现象,降低了横向供应商的最优订单量;制造商与横向的信息对称供应商分担信息租金而形成的交叉协调,在显示真实成本信息的同时,还可以提高最优订单量和整个供应链的全局利润。

关键词: 信息不对称, 激励相容, 交叉协调, 按订单装配

Abstract: Assemble-To-Order system as a vital strategy has been widely used by many manufacturing firms. A problem of asymmetric cost information is considered in assemble-to-order supply chain comprised of two component suppliers and single manufacturer. Based on the profiles of every members under complete information, the loss of vertical manufacturer and horizontal complementary supplier are analyzed due to "information disguise" from supplier who has private cost type information, and vertical supplier-manufacturer contract is presented based on incentive compatibility and cross-coordination contract with horizontal complementary supplier's participation. And the menu of contract is incentive feasible if it satisfies both incentive compatible and participation constraints.
Through mathematical deduction and data analysis, using Excel VBA programming to simulate models and data example, the result shows that:(1)under complete information, manufacturer can occupy all profit of supply chain, upstream suppliers' reservation revenues are zero.(2)under asymmetric information of supplier's cost, single supplier's information disguise not only reduces vertical manufacturer's profit and horizontal complementary supplier's profit, but also is harm to global benefit of supply chain.(3) the vertical incentive contract which is offered by manufacturer to asymmetric information supplier, can reveal the true cost information of asymmetric information supplier, and increase expected profits of vertical manufacturer and complementary supplier. But that cause "low efficiency downward distortion" effect which decreases the horizontal supplier's optimal order quantity.(4) The cross-coordination of sharing information rent between manufacturer and horizontal symmetric information supplier can reveal true cost type information and increase optimal order quantity and global profile of whole supply chain.
Above results fill the gap in the literature of ATO supply chain and incentive contract. And the managerial insight suggests that supplier need to cross-coordinate not only with vertical manufacturer, but also with horizontal complementary supplier.

Key words: information asymmetry, incentive compatibility, cross-coordination, assemble-to-order

中图分类号: