碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.01.015

中国管理科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (1): 152-162.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.01.015

碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究

刘名武^1,3, 万谧宇², 付红³

1. 重庆交通大学经济与管理学院, 重庆 400074;
2. 江西财经大学信息管理学院, 江西南昌 330013;
3. 电子科技大学经济与管理学院, 四川成都 610054

收稿日期:2016-02-01 修回日期:2017-03-01 发布日期:2018-03-19
通讯作者: 刘名武(1979-),男(汉族),安徽无为人,重庆交通大学经济与管理学院教授,电子科技大学经济与管理学院博士后,硕士生导师,管理科学与工程博士,研究方向:供应链管理,E-mail:liumingwu2007@aliyun.com E-mail:liumingwu2007@aliyun.com
基金资助:
重庆市社科规划"研究阐释党的十九大精神"项目；国家自然科学基金重点项目（71531003）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（71601031，71471024）；国家社会科学基金项目（14CGL013）；重庆市基础与前沿研究项目（cstc2016jcyjA0023）；江西省社科规划项目（15GL12）

Low-carbon Technology Selection for Supply Chain under Cap and Trade Mechanism with Low-carbon Preference

LIU Ming-wu^1,3, WAN Mi-yu², FU Hong³

1. School of Economics and Management, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China;
2. School of Information Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economic, Nanchang 330013, China;
3. School of Management and Economics, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China

Received:2016-02-01 Revised:2017-03-01 Published:2018-03-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在碳交易和消费者具有低碳偏好的环境下，通过分析体现成本和减排效率的低碳技术特征，建立供应链低碳技术减排投入与合作的动态优化模型，采用微分博弈方法，求解产品碳排放和供应链利润的长期轨迹，并且推导出实现双赢的低碳技术特征条件。鉴于现实中可选择的技术特征有限并考虑到零售商减排意愿合作水平，推导出促进零售商低碳合作的市场条件，并证明了将生产和使用两个环节排放同时纳入碳交易有利于激励供应商减排。

关键词: 碳交易, 低碳偏好, 低碳技术选择, 微分博弈

Abstract: In this paper,the problem of choosing low-carbon technologies under carbon trading market mechanism is investigated by dividing the carbon emissions of a product into the manufacturing stage and the usage stage. It is we assumed that the supplier can make efforts to reduce the carbon emission in each of the two stages and the efficiencies in terms of reducing the carbon emission in the two stages by the supplier's efforts are different. It is Further assumed that consumers prefer to low-carbon products.The technology characteristics of low carbon with cost and efficiency are analyzed and a dynamic supply chain optimization model with low carbon technology investment and cooperation is set up. The optimal decision for the supplier (i.e., the efforts that made in two carbon emission stages) is derived and obtain the corresponding profits of the chain members are obtained by solving a Hamilton Jacobi Bellman Equation. The optimal trajectory of product carbon emission is obtained. In view of the limited choice about technical features in practice and the willing cooperation level of the retailer, the market condition for promoting the retailer cooperation is derived. The study shows that:(1) In the short term, the margin profit of emission reduction can improve both emission and profit; while in the long term, if the efforts are selected properly in the two carbon emission stages, a win-win result can be achieved. (2) The revenue from the market is crucial to cooperation, and has a positive impact on the cooperation between the two chain members. (3) Dividing emissions in the two carbon emission stages under carbon trading market can encourage carbon reduction efforts. Additionally, numerical experiments are used to analyze the influence of critical factors. In this paper, the question about which kind of technologies should be adopted is answered and a basic idea and framework is provided for supply chain carbon emission reducing.

Key words: cap and trade, low-carbon preference, low-carbon technology selection, differential game

中图分类号:

TP315

刘名武, 万谧宇, 付红. 碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(1): 152-162.

LIU Ming-wu, WAN Mi-yu, FU Hong. Low-carbon Technology Selection for Supply Chain under Cap and Trade Mechanism with Low-carbon Preference[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(1): 152-162.

参考文献

[1] 韦映梅, 方润生, 冯玉强. 基于竞争优势视角的我国低碳经济研究现状述评[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2014, 7(1):193-200.

[2] 帅传敏, 张钰坤. 中国消费者低碳产品支付意愿的差异分析-基于碳标签的情景实验数据[J]. 中国软科学, 2013, 7(1):61-70.

[3] Chen Xi, Benjaafar S, Elomri A. The carbon-constrained EOQ[J]. Operations Research Letters, 2013, 41(2):172-179.

[4] Arikan E, Jammernegg W. The single period inventory model under dual sourcing and product carbon footprint constraint[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 157(1):15-23.

[5] 杜少甫, 董骏峰, 梁樑,等. 考虑排放许可与交易的生产优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(3):81-86.

[6] Kramer R, Subramanian A, Vidal T, et al. A matheuristic approach for the Pollution-Routing Problem[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, 243(2):523-539.

[7] Konur D, Schaefer B. Integrated inventory control and transportation decisions under carbon emissions regulations:LTL vs. TL carriers[J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2014, 68(1):14-38.

[8] Toptal A, Özlü H, Konur D. Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52(1):243-269.

[9] Barari S, Agarwal G, Zhang C, et al. A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts:An evolutionary game approach[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3):2965-2976.

[10] 赵道致, 原白云, 徐春明. 低碳供应链纵向合作减排的动态优化[J]. 控制与决策, 2014, 29(7):1340-1344.

[11] 王芹鹏, 赵道致. 消费者低碳偏好下的供应链收益共享契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 9(1):106-113.

[12] 骆瑞玲, 范体军, 夏海洋. 碳排放交易政策下供应链碳减排技术投资的博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(11):44-53.

[13] 何华, 马常松, 吴忠和. 碳限额与交易政策下考虑绿色技术投入的定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5):74-84.

[14] 杨伟娜, 刘西林. 排污权交易制度下企业环境技术采纳时间研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(2):230-237.

[15] Ma T, Grubler A, Nakamori Y. Modeling technology adoptions for sustainable development under increasing returns, uncertainty, and heterogeneous agents[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 195(1):296-306.

[16] 王志国, 李磊, 杨善林, 等. 动态博弈下引导企业低碳技术创新的政府低碳规制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(12):139-147.

[17] 徐建中, 徐莹莹. 基于演化博弈的制造企业低碳技术采纳决策机制研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2014, 23(5):264-272.

[18] 熊中楷, 胡金辉. 消费者低碳意识和政府碳税下低碳技术选择[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2014, 31(15):65-71.

[19] 朱慧贇, 常香云, 范体军, 等. 碳排放税机制下企业再制造技术选择决策研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2013, 30(20):80-84.

[20] 慕艳芬, 聂佳佳, 马祖军. 面向异质性消费者企业低碳技术选择研究[J]. 工业工程与管理, 2015, 20(3):51-59.

[21] Chenavaz R. Dynamic pricing, product and process innovation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 222(3):553-557.

碳交易和低碳偏好下供应链低碳技术选择研究

Low-carbon Technology Selection for Supply Chain under Cap and Trade Mechanism with Low-carbon Preference

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	叶同, 关志民, 张大儒, 曲优. Nash讨价还价公平关切下基于低碳商誉的供应链联合减排与广告的动态优化与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 119-132.
[2]	令狐大智, 武新丽, 叶飞. 考虑双重异质性的碳配额分配及交易机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 176-187.
[3]	叶欣, 周艳菊. 考虑商誉的双渠道供应链动态定价与联合减排策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 117-128.
[4]	刁心薇, 曾珍香, 孙丞. 混合碳政策下两产品供应链的协同研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 149-159.
[5]	廖诺, 卢晨, 贺勇. 碳交易政策下节能服务公司参与供应链合作减排策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 160-167.
[6]	纪雅杰, 马德青, 胡劲松. 供应商管理库存下基于消费者行为偏好的全渠道运营策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 82-96.
[7]	张桂涛, 王广钦, 赵欣语, 刘阳. 碳配额交易体系下闭环供应链网络的生产与碳交易策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 97-108.
[8]	张令荣, 王健, 彭博. 内外部碳配额交易路径下供应链减排决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 145-154.
[9]	王芹鹏. 考虑参考减排努力水平效应的联合减排与竞争动态策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 172-182.
[10]	徐松鹤, 韩传峰. 基于微分博弈的流域生态补偿机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 199-207.
[11]	马德青, 胡劲松. 具公平行为的零售商回收闭环供应链动态均衡策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 70-78.
[12]	马永红, 刘海礁, 柳清. 产业共性技术产学研协同研发策略的微分博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 197-207.
[13]	廖诺, 赵亚莉, 贺勇, 周雅. 碳交易政策对电煤供应链利润及碳排放量影响的仿真分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 154-163.
[14]	孙嘉楠, 肖忠东. 考虑消费者双重偏好的低碳供应链减排策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(4): 49-56.
[15]	王艳, 谭德庆. 劣势耐用品厂商的产品质保期与质保服务投入策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(2): 142-151.