供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.0489

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 109-118.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.0489

供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究

曹晓宁¹, 王永明², 薛方红¹, 刘晓冰¹

1. 大连理工大学经济管理学院, 制造管理信息化技术国家地方联合工程实验室, 辽宁大连 116024;
2. 昆明理工大学管理与经济学院, 云南昆明 650093

收稿日期:2017-04-21 修回日期:2018-06-05 发布日期:2021-04-02
通讯作者: 王永明(1976-),男(汉族),云南曲靖人,昆明理工大学管理与经济学院管理科学与信息管理系,主任,教授,博导,研究方向为:物流与供应链管理、运营管理,E-mail:ym_w@kmust.edu.cn. E-mail:ym_w@kmust.edu.cn
作者简介:王永明(1976-),男(汉族),云南曲靖人,昆明理工大学管理与经济学院管理科学与信息管理系,主任,教授,博导,研究方向为:物流与供应链管理、运营管理,E-mail:ym_w@kmust.edu.cn.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71640028，71362030）

Coordination Strategies for Dual-channel Supply Chain of Fresh Agricultural Products Considering the Fresh-keeping Effort of Supplier

CAO Xiao-ning¹, WANG Yong-ming², XUE Fang-hong¹, LIU Xiao-bing¹

1. National & Local Joint Engineering Laboratory of Manufacturing Management Information Technology, Faculty of Economics and Management, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China;
2. Faculty of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China

Received:2017-04-21 Revised:2018-06-05 Published:2021-04-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在互联网迅猛发展的时代，生鲜农产品双渠道营销模式是供应商的最佳选择，如何发挥双渠道优势，实现渠道共赢是目前研究的热点。以供应商主导的双渠道供应链为研究对象，考虑新鲜度衰减且扰动需求和供应商保鲜努力，对比分析集中和分散决策模型，论证构建协调模型的必要性。从渠道合作和利润最大化的角度出发，设计两部定价契约、批发价协调契约和由成本分担与补偿策略构成的混合协调契约，三种契约均能在一定范围内有效实现供应链协调，提高各成员的利润。最后，对比分析所设计协调契约以认识其本质，并通过数值分析验证其有效性。

关键词: 生鲜农产品, 新鲜度衰减, 保鲜努力, 双渠道供应链协调, 供货比例

Abstract: With the rapid development of the Internet and information technology, the dual-channel marketing of fresh agricultural products becomes gradually the best choice for suppliers. It is the problem for scholars to realize the coordination of dual-channel supply chain because of the cooperative and competitive relationship between supplier and retailer.
The models of centralized and decentralized decision-making using Stackelberg game are presented considering the loss of freshness, the influence of freshness on demand and the fresh-keeping effort of supplier in a supplier-led dual channel supply chain. Compared with centralized and decentralized decision-making models, the optimal profit of supply chain system under centralized decision-making is larger than that of decentralized. Moreover, the optimal level of fresh-keeping efforts under centralized decision-making is less than that of decentralized. The optimal level of fresh-keeping efforts is positively related to the proportion of traditional channel supply under decentralized decision-making, while it is unaffected under centralized decision-making.
Coordination contracts are designed to increase supplier and retailer their own profits based on maximizing dual-channel supply chain system profit. The designed coordination contracts include two-part pricing contract, wholesale price contract, and hybrid strategy contract. In two-part pricing and wholesale price contracts, the profit of supplier increases because of the fixed fees retailer shared, while the additional fixed fees cannot affect the profit increase of retailer. Hybrid strategy contract is that the retailer shares part of the fresh-keeping effort cost as well as supplier shares some of his revenue to retailer. It is demonstrated those contracts could effectively realize the coordination of dual-channel supply chain and improve the profits of the members in a certain range. By comparing the designed coordination contracts, the nature of dual-channel supply chain coordination could be summarized as follows:the traditional coordination method of single channel supply chain do not apply to dual channel situations; the combination of fixed fees and traditional coordination method can realize the dual-channel supply chain coordination. Finally, the relevant model parameters are set up for numerical analysis to verify the correctness and effectiveness of the theoretical conclusions.This article will help scholars to understand the essence of the dual channel supply chain coordination of fresh agricultural products, and provide guiding strategies for the fresh business enterprises to implement the dual channel supply chain.

Key words: fresh agricultural products, loss of freshness, fresh-keeping effort, coordination of dual-channel supply chain, supply ratio

中图分类号:

F253.4
TP273

曹晓宁, 王永明, 薛方红, 刘晓冰. 供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 109-118.

CAO Xiao-ning, WANG Yong-ming, XUE Fang-hong, LIU Xiao-bing. Coordination Strategies for Dual-channel Supply Chain of Fresh Agricultural Products Considering the Fresh-keeping Effort of Supplier[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(3): 109-118.

参考文献

[1] Park H T K,Keh H T. Modeling hybrid distribution channels a game-theoretic analysis[J].Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2003, 10(3):155-167.
[2] 晏妮娜,黄小原,刘兵. 电子市场环境中供应链双源渠道主从对策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(3):98-102.
[3] 徐广业,但斌. 电子商务环境下双渠道供应链协调的价格折扣模型[J]. 系统工程学报, 2012, 27(3):344-350.
[4] Cai Gangshu (George). Channel selection and coordination in dual-channel supply chains[J].Journal of Retailing, 2010, 86(1):22-36.
[5] Seong Y P, Hean T K. Modelling hybrid distribution channels:A game-theoretic analysis[J].Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2003, 10(3):155-167.
[6] 彭静,林杰. 需求扰动和联合促销下双渠道供应链的竞争与协调[J]. 预测, 2015, 34(6):62-68.
[7] 王文隆,王福乐,张涑贤.考虑低碳努力的双渠道供应链协调契约研究[J/OL].管理评论:1-13[2020-09-30].https://doi.org/10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.20200914.003.
[8] Chiang W K,Chhajed D, Hess J D. Direct marketing indirect profits a strategic analysis of dual-channel supply chain design[J].Management Science, 2003, 49(1):1-20.
[9] 董志刚,徐庆,马骋. 电子商务环境下双渠道供应链的制造商分销渠道选择[J]. 系统工程, 2015, 33(6):26-33.
[10] Arya A, Mittendorf B,Sappingtou D E M. The bright side of supplier encroachment[J].Marketing Science, 2007, 26(5):651-659.
[11] 陈远高,刘南. 具有服务差异的双渠道供应链竞争策略[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2010, 16(11):2484-2489.
[12] Yao Dongqing, Liu J J. Competitive pricing of mixed retail and e-tail distribution channels[J]. Omega, 2005, 33(3):235-247.
[13] 肖剑,但斌,张旭梅. 双渠道供应链中制造商与零售商的服务合作定价策略[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 12:2203-2211.
[14] 李海,崔南方,徐贤浩.基于讨价还价能力的双渠道供应链批发价谈判模式[J].管理工程学报,2015,29(4):124-132.
[15] Carlos E C, Olga I M, Lamie R D, et al. Does e-commerce help agricultural markets? the case of marketmaker[J]. Agricultural & Applied Economics Association, 2013, 28(4):1-7.
[16] 韩智明,邵华清,国莉媛,等. 蔬果类生鲜农产品电商运营模式研究[J].中国管理信息化, 2015,18(4):170-171.
[17] Xiao Yongbo, Chen Jian. Supply chain management of fresh products with producer transportation[J]. Decision Sciences, 2012, 43(5):785-815.
[18] Cai Xiaoqiang, Chen Jian, Xiao Yongbo, et al. Fresh-product supply chain management with logistics outsourcing[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(4):752-765.
[19] 汪旭晖,张其林.电子商务破解生鲜农产品流通困局的内在机理——基于天猫生鲜与沱沱工社的双案例比较研究[J].中国软科学,2016,2:39-55.
[20] Cai Xiaoqiang, Chen Jian, Xiao Yongbo, et al. Optimization and coordination of fresh product supply chains with freshness-keeping effort[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2010, 19(3):261-278.
[21] 余云龙,冯颖. 不同冷链服务模式下生鲜农产品供应链决策[J/OL]. 中国管理科学:1-11[2020-09-30].https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.0577.
[22] 王淑云,范晓晴,马雪丽,等.考虑商品新鲜度与量变损耗的三级冷链库存优化模型[J].系统管理学报,2020,29(2):409-416.
[23] Cattani K, Perdikaki O, Marucheck A. The perishability of online grocers[J]. Decision Sciences, 2007, 38(2):329-355.
[24] 浦徐进,金德龙. 生鲜农产品供应链的运作效率比较:单一"农超对接"vs. 双渠道[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(1):98-105.
[25] Yu Juan, Gan Mi, Ni Shaoquan, et al. Multi-objective models and real case study for dual-channel FAP supply chain network design with fuzzy information[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2018, 29(2):389-403.
[26] 李文立,赵帅. 考虑溯源系统应用的优质农产品双渠道供应链决策研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2019, 28(6):98-108.
[27] 刘墨林,但斌,马崧萱. 考虑保鲜努力与增值服务的生鲜电商供应链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8):76-88.
[28] 姬小利. 伴随销售商促销努力的供应链契约设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, 14(4):46-49.
[29] 王磊,但斌. 考虑消费者效用的生鲜农产品供应链保鲜激励机制研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(1):200-206.
[30] Chung Y T, Erhun F. Designing supply contracts for perishable goods with two periods of shelf life[J]. IIE Transactions, 2013, 45(1):53-67.
[31] 但斌,徐广业,张旭梅. 电子商务环境下双渠道供应链协调的补偿策略研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012, 26(1):125-130.
[32] 张学龙,王军进. 制造商主导型双渠道供应链协调决策模型[J].控制与决策,2016,31(8):1519-1525.
[33] 谢庆华,黄培清. Internet环境下混合市场渠道协调的数量折扣模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2007, 8:1-11.
[34] Cachon G P. Supply chain coordination with contracts[J]. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 2003,11:227-339.
[35] 王汝现. 供应链协调理论的发展[J]. 第三届不确定系统年会论文集, 南京, 2005年8月, 517-530.

供应商保鲜努力的生鲜农产品双渠道供应链协调决策研究

Coordination Strategies for Dual-channel Supply Chain of Fresh Agricultural Products Considering the Fresh-keeping Effort of Supplier

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	刘墨林, 但斌, 马崧萱. 考虑保鲜努力与增值服务的生鲜电商供应链最优决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 76-88.
[2]	周继祥, 王勇, 邱晗光. 部分信息下生鲜农产品采购外包问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 122-131.
[3]	熊峰, 方剑宇, 袁俊, 金鹏. 盟员行为偏好下生鲜农产品供应链生鲜努力激励机制与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 115-126.
[4]	邵腾伟, 吕秀梅. 基于消费者主权的生鲜电商消费体验设置[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 118-126.
[5]	曹裕, 李业梅, 万光羽. 基于消费者效用的生鲜农产品供应链生鲜度激励机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(2): 160-174.
[6]	马雪丽, 王淑云, 金辉, 柏庆国. 考虑保鲜努力与数量/质量弹性的农产品三级供应链协调优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(2): 175-185.
[7]	唐跃武, 范体军, 刘莎. 考虑策略性消费者的生鲜农产品定价和库存决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(11): 105-113.
[8]	浦徐进, 金德龙. 生鲜农产品供应链的运作效率比较:单一“农超对接”vs.双渠道[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(1): 98-105.
[9]	杨亚, 范体军, 张磊. 新鲜度信息不对称下生鲜农产品供应链协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(9): 147-155.
[10]	邵腾伟, 吕秀梅. 基于F2F的生鲜农产品C2B众筹预售定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(11): 146-152.
[11]	浦徐进, 范旺达, 吴亚. 渠道模式、努力投入与生鲜农产品供应链运作效率研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 105-112.
[12]	李琳, 范体军. 零售商主导下生鲜农产品供应链的定价策略对比研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 113-123.
[13]	张伟, 周根贵. 一次提前订购下生鲜农产品的最优订货[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(11): 138-144.
[14]	但斌, 丁松. 基于顾客分类的生鲜农产品二次补货策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(6): 87-93.
[15]	但斌, 王磊, 李宇雨. 考虑消费者效用与保鲜的生鲜农产品EOQ模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(1): 100-108.