活跃度与补贴对O2O平台需求的影响机理及优化策略

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.2679

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 173-181.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.2679cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.2679

活跃度与补贴对O2O平台需求的影响机理及优化策略

吴志樵¹, 康亚玲¹, 罗健², 唐加福¹

1.东北财经大学管理科学与工程学院，辽宁大连116025;2.海南大学管理学院，海南海口570228

收稿日期:2021-12-24 修回日期:2022-03-10 出版日期:2023-02-20 发布日期:2023-02-28
通讯作者: 罗健(1988-)，男(汉族)，江西抚州人，海南大学管理学院，教授，博士，研究方向：运作管理、非线性优化及其应用，Email: luojian546@hotmail.com. E-mail:luojian546@hotmail.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目 (71831003,72172027)

Research on the Effect Mechanism and Optimization Strategy of Activeness and Subsidy on Platform User Demand

WU Zhi-qiao¹, KANG Ya-ling¹, LUO Jian², TANG Jia-fu¹

1. College of Management Science & Engineering, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, Dalian 116025, China;2. College of Management, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China

Received:2021-12-24 Revised:2022-03-10 Online:2023-02-20 Published:2023-02-28
Contact: 罗健 E-mail:luojian546@hotmail.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了商家活跃度和补贴水平对O2O(Online to Offline)平台需求的影响机理及用户需求随机下平台如何制定补贴策略的问题。首先，依托百度外卖(饿了么)实际运营数据特征，考虑商家活跃度和补贴水平下，构建时间序列与多元回归相结合模型，来有效识别活跃度与补贴带动用户需求的影响机理，结果表明，商家活跃度及补贴优惠能够有效带动用户需求。其次，进一步结合O2O用户即时需求与订单价格呈现的非线性相关特性，构建平台、商家、用户参与的序贯博弈模型，分析平台最优活跃度水平及最优补贴策略。结果表明，为获取总体收益最大，平台应依据商家交叉网络强度差异化实时调整补贴策略，进而灵活调控用户弹性。

关键词: 数据赋能；即时需求；网络效应；活跃度；补贴策略

Abstract: The Online to Offline (O2O) platform, connecting merchants with customers, has provided a trading venue for online transaction but offline experiencing. As an emerging two-sided platform, cross network effect promotes the explosive growth of O2O market scale. However, compared with conventional two-sided platform, the massive transaction data accumulated on the O2O platform are highly time-dependent, and the stochastic of users’ on-demand makes real-time subsidy strategy become a more complex operation problem.

Key words: digital empowerment; on-demand; network effect; activeness; subsidy strategy

中图分类号:

F274

吴志樵,康亚玲,罗健, 等. 活跃度与补贴对O2O平台需求的影响机理及优化策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(2): 173-181.

WU Zhi-qiao,KANG Ya-ling,LUO Jian, et al. Research on the Effect Mechanism and Optimization Strategy of Activeness and Subsidy on Platform User Demand[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 173-181.

参考文献

［1］周雄伟, 蔡丹, 李世刚, 等. 基于网络外部性和质量差异化的产品定价策略［J］. 管理科学学报,2019, 22(8): 1-16.Zhou Xiongwei, Cai Dan, Li Shigang, et al. Monopoly pricing strategy of quality-differentiated products with network externality［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2019, 22(8): 1-16.
［2］ Filistrucchi L, Geradin D, Van Damme E. Identifying two-sided markets［R］. Discussion Paper, TILEC, 2012.
［3］ Evans D. The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets［J］. Yale Journal on Regulation, 2003, 20(2): 325-381.
［4］李雷, 赵先德, 简兆权. 网络环境下平台企业的运营策略研究［J］. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(3): 15-33.Li Lei, Zhao Xiande, Jian Zhaoquan. Operation srategy of platform enterprisesin network environments［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19(3): 15-33.
［5］ Armstrong M. Competition in two-sided markets［J］. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 668-691.
［6］陈威如,余卓轩.平台战略［M］. 北京:中信出版社,2019.Chen Weiru, Yu Zhuoxuan. Platform strategy［M］. Beijing: Citic Press, 2019.
［7］ Caillaud B, Jullien B. Chicken & Egg: Competition among intermediation service providers［J］. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2003, 34(2): 309-328.
［8］ Eisenmann T R, Parker G, Alstyne M V. Opening platforms: when, how and why?［R］. Working Paper, Harvard Business Review, 2008.
［9］段文奇, 柯玲芬. 利用临界用户规模提升平台利润的定价策略［J］. 管理科学学报, 2019, 22(12): 40-55.Duan Wenqi, Ke Lingfen. Pricing strategy to increase two-sided platform profit by exploiting critical mass［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2019，22(12): 40-55.
［10］钟琦, 杨雪帆, 吴志樵. 平台生态系统价值共创的研究述评［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(2): 421-430.Zhong Qi, Yang Xuefan, Wu Zhiqiao. A review of value co-creation in platform ecosystems［J］. Systems Engineering—Theory & Theory, 2021, 41(2): 421-430.
［11］ Tong Tingting, Dai Hongyan, Xiao Qin, et al. Will dynamic pricing outperform? Theoretical analysis and empirical evidence from O2O on-demand food service market［J］. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 219: 375-385.
［12］张凯, 董远山. 双边平台中用户运营成本与定价策略选择［J］. 管理工程学报, 2019, 33(3): 153-161.Zhang Kai, Dong Yuanshan. Operating costs of agents and choice of pricing strategies in two-sided platform［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Engineering Management, 2019, 33(3): 153-161.
［13］胥莉, 陈宏民. 具有网络外部性特征的企业定价策略研究［J］. 管理科学学报, 2006,9(6): 23-30.Xu Li, Chen Hongmin. Study on pricing strategy choice of firms with network externality［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2006,9(6): 23-30.
［14］丁雪峰, 陈前程. 服务商组内网络外部性与物流双边平台定价策略及影响研究［J］. 管理评论, 2021, 33(3): 292-306.Ding Xuefeng, Chen Qiancheng. Research on pricing strategy of two-sided logistics platform with considering the intra-group network externality of service providers［J］. Management Review, 2021, 33(3): 292-306.
［15］刘维奇, 张苏. 双边平台兼并策略下的定价问题分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(5): 17-24.Liu Weiqi, Zhang Su. Pricing analysis of merger strategy in two-sided markets［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Sciences, 2017, 25(5): 17-24.
［16］邢鹏, 何天润. 三种运营模式下O2O外卖服务供应链质量努力策略研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 115-126.Xing Peng, He Tianrun. Optimal quality effort strategy in O2O food delivery service supply chain based on three operation models［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Sciences, 2020, 28(9): 115-126.
［17］张旭梅, 郑雁文, 李梦丽, 等. O2O模式中考虑附加服务和平台营销努力的供应链合作策略研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 181-190.Zhang Xumei, Zheng Yanwen, Li Mengli, et al. Cooperation strategy for supply chain considering Add—On service and platform’s marketing effort in O2O model［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Sciences, 2022, 30(2): 181-190.
［18］范丹丹, 徐琪, 程方正. 考虑退货影响的品牌商O2O渠道选择与决策优化［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 138-148.Fan Dandan, Xu Qi, Cheng Fangzheng. Brand suppliers’ O2O channel selection and decision optimization considering the impact of customer returns［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Sciences, 2019, 27(11): 138-148.
［19］金亮，陈朝晖，温焜. 线上零售商开设体验店：基于供应链的视角［J］. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 135-147.Jin Liang, Chen Zhaohui, Wen Kun. Online retailers open the showroom: based on the perspective of supply chain［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Sciences, 2022, 30(6): 135-147.
［20］ Lariviere M A. A note on probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates［J］. Operations Research, 2006, 54(3): 602-604.
［21］ Chen Yingju, Seshadri, S. Product development and pricing strategy for information goods under heterogeneous outside opportunities［J］. Information Systems Research 2007, 18(2): 123-232.
［22］ Baakea P, Boom A. Vertical product differentiation, network externalities, and compatibility decisions［J］. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2001, 19(1-2): 267-284.
［23］ Colombo L, Labrecciosab P. A note on pricing with risk aversion［J］. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 216(1): 252-254.
［24］ Wu Desheng. Service quality, outsourcing and upward channel decentralization［J］. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2016, 67: 240-247.
［25］ Bhargava H K, Choudhary V. Information goods and vertical differentiation［J］. Journal of Management Information Systems, 2015, 18(2): 89-106.
［26］ Mehra A, Bala R, Sankaranarayanan R. Competitive behavior-based price discrimination for software upgrades［J］. Information Systems Research 2010, 23(1): 60-74.
［27］ Banciu M, Mirchandani P. Technical note-new results concerning probability distributions with increasing generalized failure rates［J］. Operations Research, 2013, 61(4): 925-931.
［28］池毛毛, 刘姝君, 卢新元, 等. 共享住宿平台上房东持续参与意愿的影响机理研究：平台网络效应的视角［J］. 南开管理评论,2019, 22(4): 103-113.Chi Maomao, Liu Shujun, Lu Xinyuan, et al. The influencing mechanism of the re-participation intention of host in the shared accommodation platform: the perspective of platform network effects［J］. Nankai Business Review, 2019, 22(4): 103-113.
［29］叶琼伟, 张谦, 杜萌, 等. 基于双边市场理论的社交网络广告定价分析［J］. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(1): 169-178.Ye Qiongwei, Zhang Qian, Du Meng, et al. The analysis of advertising pricing based on the two-sided markets theory in social network［J］. Nankai Business Review, 2016, 19(1): 169-178.
［30］ Gallino S, Moreno A. Integration of online and offline channels in retail: the impact of sharing reliable inventory availability information ［J］. Management Science, 2014, 60(6): 1434-1451.
［31］ Chiang W K, Chhajed D, Hess J D. Direct marketing, indirect profits: a strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design［J］. Management Science, 2003, 49(1): 1-20.

[1]	刘琦铀, 陈嘉, 张成科, 朱怀念. 联邦学习与区块链赋能下的应收账款拍卖融资机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 13-21.
[2]	张晓青, 苑希港, 陈佳佳, 魏强, 霍宝锋. 考虑消费者隐私顾虑的消费品以旧换新定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 291-302.
[3]	常建红, 宋鹏, 吴丽荣. 数据交易驱动下在线商家产品个性化定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 36-49.
[4]	赵世杰, 荣雪娇, 高雷阜. 耦合行为运作下考虑供需关系的订购行为决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 303-318.
[5]	王成付, 陈祥锋, 金伟, 丁雯. 区块链智能合约驱动下动态利率定价的订单融资与供应链运营策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 319-330.
[6]	赵玉, 郑本荣, 金亮. 转售、代销还是混合模式？竞争性电商平台销售模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 331-343.
[7]	申笑宇, 代莉. 绿色产品“上链”决策与销售模式协同研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 344-355.
[8]	公彦德, 开吉, 王哲. 考虑公平偏好和绿色创新的绿色供应链策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(5): 310-321.
[9]	孙华丽, 马晨欣, 张俊鸽. 供应中断风险下考虑低息贷款和营业中断保险的应对策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(5): 342-350.
[10]	仝鹏, 丁翔, 王文宾, 毛展鹏, 肖莹. 碳交易机制下考虑零售商信息分享策略的供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(4): 287-297.
[11]	林帅成, 张桂涛. “双积分”政策下考虑新能源汽车续航和广告宣传的微分策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(4): 319-329.
[12]	李涛, 赵俊, 刘洋, 刘斌. 考虑零售商“虚拟合作”的竞争性供应链定价策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 275-285.
[13]	邹宗保, 陈力豪, 梁强, 周少锐. 集中还是分离：车电运营策略对竞争对手电池供应商选择的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 309-319.
[14]	戴道明, 王忆都. 可再生能源消纳责任权重制下光伏供应链合作与运营决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 320-332.
[15]	牟进进, 王淑云. 跨境电商供应链物流增值服务的优化决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(2): 298-308.

活跃度与补贴对O2O平台需求的影响机理及优化策略

Research on the Effect Mechanism and Optimization Strategy of Activeness and Subsidy on Platform User Demand

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0