中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 111-121.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0654cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0654
张鹏, 崔淑琳, 李璟欣
收稿日期:2022-03-31
修回日期:2022-09-13
出版日期:2023-06-20
发布日期:2023-06-17
通讯作者:
张鹏(1975-),男(汉族),江西吉安人,华南师范大学经济管理学院,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:投资组合优化、金融工程,Email:zhangpeng300478@ aliyun.com.
E-mail:zhangpeng300478@aliyun.com
基金资助:ZHANG Peng, CUI Shu-lin, LI Jing-xin
Received:2022-03-31
Revised:2022-09-13
Online:2023-06-20
Published:2023-06-17
Contact:
张鹏
E-mail:zhangpeng300478@aliyun.com
摘要: 投资者决策受投资者态度影响。考虑投资者对股票市场的态度,本文运用一致性模糊数描述资产的收益率,构建具有V型交易成本、借贷限制等现实约束的一致性均值—CVaR可信性投资组合模型。该模型是线性规划问题,可运用线性规划的旋转算法求解。本文运用Fama和French因子模型从沪深A股中选取样本资产进行实证分析。样本内研究及样本外检验均表明,投资者对股票市场的不同态度显著影响投资组合表现,因此正确评估投资者对股票市场的态度能够帮助个人和机构投资者制定科学合理的投资决策。
中图分类号:
张鹏,崔淑琳,李璟欣. 一致性均值-CVaR可信性投资组合优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(6): 111-121.
ZHANG Peng,CUI Shu-lin,LI Jing-xin. Coherent Mean-CVaR Credibilistic Portfolio Selection[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(6): 111-121.
| [1] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection[J]. The Journal of Finance,1952, 7(1): 77-91. [2] 张鹏,曾永泉.具有卖空总量限制的多阶段M—SAD投资组合优化[J].中国管理科学,2021,29(6):60-69.Zhang Peng, Zeng Yongquan. Multiperiod mean semi-absolute deviation portfolio selection with total short selling constraints[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021,29(6):60-69. [3] 张金清,张剑宇.基于半方差的组合保险策略设计与应用研究[J].统计研究,2021,38(5):55-69.Zhang Jinqing, Zhang Jianyu. Portfolio insurance strategy design and application based on semi-variance[J]. Statistical Research,2021, 38(5):55-69. [4] Guo Xu, Chan R H, Wong W K, et al. Meanvariance, meanVaR, and meanCVaR models for portfolio selection with background risk[J]. Risk Management, 2019, 21(2): 73-98. [5] 许启发,周莹莹,蒋翠侠.带有范数约束的CVaR高维组合投资决策[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(2):40-49.Xu Qifa, Zhou Yingying, Jiang Cuixia. CVaR based high dimensional portfolio selection under norm constraints[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2017,25(2):40-49. [6] Chen H H, Yang C B. Multiperiod portfolio investment using stochastic programming with conditional value at risk[J]. Computers & Operations Research, 2017, 81: 305-321. [7] Strub M S, Li Duan, Cui Xiangyu, et al. Discrete-time mean-CVaR portfolio selection and time-consistency induced term structure of the CVaR[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2019, 108: 103751. [8] Liu Yongjun, Zhang Weiguo. Possibilistic moment models for multi-period portfolio selection with fuzzy returns[J]. Computational Economics, 2019,53:1657-1686. [9] Pahade J K, Jha M. Credibilistic variance and skewness of trapezoidal fuzzy variable and mean-variance-skewness model for portfolio selection[J]. Results in Applied Mathematics, 2021, 11: 100-159. [10] Liu Yongjun, Zhang Weiguo, Zhang Qun. Credibilistic multi-period portfolio optimization model with bankruptcy control and affine recourse[J]. Applied Soft Computing, 2016, 38: 890-906. [11] Kar M B, Kar S, Guo S, et al. A new bi-objective fuzzy portfolio selection model and its solution through evolutionary algorithms[J]. Soft Computing, 2019, 23(12): 4367-4381. [12] Mehlawat M K, Gupta P, Kumar A, et al. Multiobjective fuzzy portfolio performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis under credibilistic framework[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2020, 28(11): 2726-2737. [13] Li Hongquan, Yi Zhihong. Portfolio selection with coherent Investor’s expectations under uncertainty[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 133: 49-58. [14] Gupta P, Mehlawat M K, Khan A Z. Multi-period portfolio optimization using coherent fuzzy numbers in a credibilistic environment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021, 167: 114135. [15] Mehlawat M K, Gupta P, Khan A Z. Multiobjective portfolio optimization using coherent fuzzy numbers in a credibilistic environment[J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021, 36(4): 1560-1594. [16] Fama E F, French K R. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1993, 33(1): 3-56. [17] Fama E F, French K R. A five-factor asset pricing model[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 116(1): 1-22. [18] Li Xiang, Liu Baoding. A sufficient and necessary condition for credibility measures[J]. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2006, 14(5): 527-535. [19] Liu Baoding, Liu Yiankui. Expected value of fuzzy variable and fuzzy expected value models[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2002, 10(4): 445-450. [20] Liu Baoding. Uncertainty theory[M]. Germany: Springer, 2007. [21] Liu Naiqi, Chen Yanju, Liu Yankui. Optimizing portfolio selection problems under credibilistic CVaR criterion[J]. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2018, 34(1): 335-347. [22] 张鹏,张忠桢,岳超源.限制性卖空的均值-半绝对偏差投资组合模型及其旋转算法研究[J].中国管理科学,2006(2):7-11.Zhang Peng, Zhang Zhongzhen, Yue Chaoyuan. Optimization of the mean semi-absolute deviation portfolio selection model with the restricted short selling based on the pivoting algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2006(2):7-11. [23] 李志冰,杨光艺,冯永昌,等.Fama-French五因子模型在中国股票市场的实证检验[J].金融研究,2017(6):191-206.Li Zhibing, Yang Guangyi, Feng Yongchang, et al. Fama-French five factor model in China stock market[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2017(6):191-206. [24] Vercher E, Bermudez J D, Segura J V. Fuzzy portfolio optimization under downside risk measures[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2007, 158(7): 769-782. [25] DeMiguel V, Garlappi L, Uppal R. Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy?[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(5): 1915-1953. |
| [1] | 王良, 何俊杰, 黄国庆, 张金辉, 王潇涵. 基于前景理论与Bayes后验信念的风险投资项目最优投资时机研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 22-35. |
| [2] | 徐涛, 陈庭强. 银行拆借偏好、网络结构演化与金融风险传染[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(6): 1-12. |
| [3] | 江雨燕, 黄体臣, 甘如美江, 王付宇. 基于KANsLTformer的黄金期货价格预测研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(5): 11-20. |
| [4] | 朱鹏飞, 卢团团, 魏宇, 林莎. 基于多小波降噪—分形标幅双集成法的股指期货套期保值比率估计研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(5): 21-34. |
| [5] | 吴鑫育, 尹学宝, 谢海滨, 马超群. 基于成分Realized EGARCH模型的期权定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(4): 22-33. |
| [6] | 张晗, 赵骅, 李志国, 蒋莉. 碳排放区域转移视角下政府规制与企业投资[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(4): 330-342. |
| [7] | 王远平, 杨金强, 孟祥煜. 时间偏好不一致性下的消费和投资选择——基于投资业绩稳定的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(4): 1-12. |
| [8] | 俞乃畅, 程康, 李心丹, 杨学伟. 权证实现了股权分置改革对价支付功能吗?[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 1-14. |
| [9] | 武瑶瑶, 邹镇涛. 模型不确定性下的企业最优资本结构[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(3): 51-56. |
| [10] | 张永, 黄清梅, 郑萧腾, 王福鼎, 杨兴雨. 考虑投资者关注度的反转型在线投资组合策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(2): 56-66. |
| [11] | 吴鑫育, 朱志田, 马超群. 经济政策不确定性与中国股市波动率——基于已实现SV-MIDAS模型的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(1): 28-40. |
| [12] | 陈镇喜, 李京翰, 张维. 股价同步性——信息与噪声的统一框架[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(1): 41-59. |
| [13] | 马勇, 陈犁, 陈炜. 货币政策公告前的股价漂移:形成机理与影响因素[J]. 中国管理科学, 2026, 34(1): 60-71. |
| [14] | 李志楠, 雷静悦, 沈沛龙. 信息溢出对银企担保网络流动性风险传染的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(12): 26-40. |
| [15] | 崔毅安, 韦立坚, 熊熊. 计算实验与订单簿市场建模发展动态综述[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(12): 1-12. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
|
||