债券投标专利拍卖：均衡策略与期望收益

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.2035

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (6): 22-33.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.2035cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.2035

债券投标专利拍卖：均衡策略与期望收益

时奇¹, 沈芳²

1.东华理工大学经济与管理学院，江西南昌330013；2.武汉大学质量发展战略研究院，湖北武汉430072

收稿日期:2019-12-19 修回日期:2020-06-28 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-24
通讯作者: 时奇(1979-)，男(汉族)，江西彭泽人，东华理工大学经济与管理学院，副教授，博士，研究方向：产业组织与机制设计，Email：qi.shi@foxmail.com. E-mail:qi.shi@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家社科基金资助项目(17BJY026)

Debt-Bid Patent Auctions: Equilibrium Strategyand Expected Revenue

SHI Qi¹, SHEN Fang²

1. School of Economics and Management, East China University of Technology, Nanchang 330013, China;2. Institute of Quality Development Strategy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2019-12-19 Revised:2020-06-28 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-24
Contact: 时奇 E-mail:qi.shi@foxmail.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 债券投标是一种操作简易的证券投标，常用于成长型中小企业参与投标的专利拍卖。在债券投标专利拍卖中，获胜企业在其产业利润实现之后支付其报价，如果其产业利润还足以支付其报价，则支付其全部产业利润。本文建立了一个存在N个投标企业的拍卖模型，研究了在债券投标专利拍卖中，一价拍卖和二价拍卖下企业的均衡投标策略和专利持有者的期望收益，并将其与现金投标专利拍卖进行比较。研究结果发现，企业在债券投标专利拍卖中的均衡投标高于现金投标专利拍卖的均衡投标，且二价现金投标专利拍卖和二价债券投标专利拍卖的均衡投标策略不随企业类型分布的变化和参与企业个数的变化而变化；专利持有者在债券投标专利拍卖中获得的期望收益高于现金投标专利拍卖的期望收益；在债券投标专利拍卖中，二价债券投标专利拍卖的期望收益高于一价债券投标专利拍卖的期望收益。

关键词: 债券投标;专利拍卖;均衡策略;期望收益

Abstract: Debt-bid is a kind of simple security-bid, which is often used by growing SMEs to participate in patent auctions. In debt-bid patent auctions, the winning firm pays its bid after the realization of its industrial profits. If its industrial profits are not enough to pay its bid, it pays all its industrial profits. Then the patent holder does not get the total bidpromised by the winning firm. On the other hand, the bidding firmis protected by limited liability, thus the firms have incentives to bid aggressively. So, does debt-bid bring higher expected revenues to the patent holder than cash-bid?

Key words: debt-bid; patent auction; equilibrium strategy; expected revenue

中图分类号:

F224

时奇,沈芳. 债券投标专利拍卖：均衡策略与期望收益[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 22-33.

SHI Qi,SHEN Fang. Debt-Bid Patent Auctions: Equilibrium Strategyand Expected Revenue[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 22-33.

参考文献

［1］李小娟,隋雪青.专利拍卖在我国的发展机遇与挑战［J］.中国科学院院刊, 2015, 30(3):354-359.Li Xiaojuan, Sui Xueqing. Opportunities and challenges of patent auction in China［J］. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2015,30(3):354-359.
［2］ Katz M L, Shapiro C. How to license intangible property［J］. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986, 101(3):567-589.
［3］ Giebe T, Wolfstetter E. License auctions with royalty contracts for (winners and) losers［J］. Games and Economic Behavior, 2008, 63(1): 91-106.
［4］ Fan Cuihong, Jun B H, Wolfstetter E. Licensing process innovations when losers’ messages determine royalty rates［J］. Games and Economic Behavior, 2013, 82(1):388-402.
［5］ Hansen R G. Auctions with contingent payments［J］. American Economic Review, 1985, 75(4):862-865.
［6］ Riley J G. Ex post information in auctions［J］. The Review of Economic Studies, 1988, 55(3):409-429.
［7］ Deb R, Mishra D. Implementation with contingent contracts［J］. Econometrica, 2014, 82(6):2371-2393.
［8］ DeMarzo P M, Kremer I, Skrzypacz A. Bidding with securities: Auctions and security design［J］. American Economic Review, 2005, 95(4):936-959.
［9］ Che Y, Kim J. Bidding with Securities: Comment［J］. The American Economic Review, 2010, 100(4):1929-1935.
［10］ Abhishek V, Hajek B, Williams S R. On bidding with securities: Risk aversion and positive dependence［J］. Games & Economic Behavior, 2015,90:66-80.
［11］ Hernandez-Chanto A, Fioriti A. Bidding securities in projects with negative externalities［J］.European Economic Review, 2019,118:14-36.
［12］ Gorbenko A S， Malenko A. Competition among sellers in securities auctions［J］. American Economic Review, 2011, 101(5):1806-1841.
［13］ Sogo T, Bernhardt D, Liu T, et al. Endogenous entry to security-bid auctions［J］. The American Economic Review, 2016, 106(11): 3577-3589.
［14］ Che Y, Gale I. Standard auctions with financially constrained bidders［J］. The Review of Economic Studies, 1998, 65(1): 1-21.
［15］韩帅,刘树林.带预算约束的广告主均衡报价研究—基于纳什均衡角度［J］. 中国管理科学,2019,27(5):57-67.Han Shuai, Liu Shulin. A study on advertisers’ equilibrium bids with budget-constraints-based on the nash Equilibrium［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2019,27(5):57-67.
［16］ Bobkova N. Asymmetric budget constraints in a first-price auction［J］. Journal of Economic Theory, 2020,186,104975.
［17］ Zheng C. High bids and broke winners［J］. Journal of Economic Theory, 2001, 100(1):129-171.
［18］ Board S. Bidding into the red: A model of post-auction bankruptcy［J］. The Journal of Finance, 2007, 62(6):2695-2723.
［19］周正龙,马本江,胡凤英.随机需求下的P2P网络借贷拍卖机制［J］. 中国管理科学,2018,26(5):21-30.Zhou Zhenglong, Ma Benjiang, Hu Fengying. Auctions for online peer-to-peer lending under stochastic demand［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science,2018,26(5):21-30.
［20］ Krishna V. Auction theory, 2th edition［M］. New York: Academic Press, 2010.

[1]	孙嘉轶, 路阳阳, 滕春贤. 区块链技术对低碳供应链合作策略的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 293-303.
[2]	王莺潼, 计小宇, 孟庆春. 动态不确定环境下基于多层级备份策略的供应链网络性能研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 316-326.
[3]	李梦祺, 李登峰, 南江霞. 考虑链间竞争与链内研发成本共担的绿色供应链决策——基于非合作-合作两型博弈方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 339-349.
[4]	何爽, 赵亮, 张剑, 李琳. 替代竞争情境下关联需求固定产出比联产品加工决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 76-85.
[5]	伏红勇, 雷一峰, 但斌, 掌曙光. 应对供应商减排不合规的碳审计策略：独立vs联合[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 339-348.
[6]	陈威, 田永乐, 白春光, 马永开. 考虑极端天气的电力供应链可再生能源维护策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 359-368.
[7]	吕希琛, 田银凤, 田世海, 刘佳缘, 孔庆伟. MRV机制下碳数据质量监管多主体行为决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 355-368.
[8]	李志文, 徐贤浩, 关旭, 柏庆国, 陈程. 农产品市场双寡头区块链采纳决策的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 324-336.
[9]	孙中苗, 徐琪. 区块链技术下政府对可再生能源电力消纳的动态激励补贴研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 346-359.
[10]	扈衷权, 梁倩, 沈奥, 刘阳. 基于期权契约的应急物资生产能力储备模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 247-258.
[11]	张文明, 杜玉禄. 相邻价格相关的在线单向交易问题的数据驱动型策略设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 26-33.
[12]	何洪阳, 张彬, 田苏俊. 平台经济政企协同治理的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 76-87.
[13]	周驰, 李赫, 于静. 委托代理关系下品牌商网络直播营销激励机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 265-274.
[14]	白雨, 赵昕, 丁黎黎. 考虑企业时间偏好的碳配额存储与借贷机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 357-368.
[15]	许书琴, 徐琪. 能源平台供应链可再生能源电力消纳激励契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(3): 326-338.

债券投标专利拍卖：均衡策略与期望收益

Debt-Bid Patent Auctions: Equilibrium Strategyand Expected Revenue

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0