主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Effects of Carbon Trading Policies on Profit and Carbon Emission of Electric-coal Supply Chain Based on Simulation Analysis

Expand
  • School of Management, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China

Received date: 2016-12-07

  Revised date: 2018-01-09

  Online published: 2018-10-22

Abstract

Two-layer electric-coal supply chain (ECSC) consisting of one supplier and one manufacturer is studied. The carbon emission processes of the ECSC comprising of coal production, transportation and consumption are established using system dynamics model, and impacts of different carbon trading policies on profit and carbon emission of ECSC are analyzed. The ECSC of X Coal Industry and Y power plant in Shenhua Group is taken as case study, and the results show that:first, the average share of carbon emissions in production, transportation and consumption of ECSC is 12.1%, 39.6% and 48.3%, respectively; second, the higher the price of carbon trading, the larger negative impact on profit of ECSC, and the carbon reduction effect increased first and then decreased; third, with the decline in the proportion of free quotas, the profit of the ECSC is significantly reduced, while the emission reduction effect is slightly improved; finally, carbon trading subsidies could mitigate the decline in profit of ECSC, and could effectively enhance the emission reduction effect.

Cite this article

LIAO Nuo, ZHAO Ya-li, HE Yong, ZHOU Ya . Effects of Carbon Trading Policies on Profit and Carbon Emission of Electric-coal Supply Chain Based on Simulation Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018 , 26(8) : 154 -163 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.08.016

References

[1] Dales J H. Pollution, property and prices:An essay in policy-making[M]. Toronto:University of Toronto Press, 1968:23-29.

[2] Rose A,Stevens B.The efficiency and equity of marketable permits for CO2 emission[J].Resource and Energy Economics,1993,15(1):117-146.

[3] Cramton P.,Kerr S. Tradeable carbon permit auctions:How and why to auction not grandfather[J]. Energy Policy,2002,30(4):333-345.

[4] 关丽娟,乔晗,赵鸣. 我国碳排放权交易及其定价研究——基于影子价格模型的分析[J]. 价格理论与实践,2012,(4):45-49.

[5] Smale R,Hartley M,Hepburn C. The impact of emissions trading on firm profits and market prices[J]. Climate Policy,2006,6(1):29-40.

[6] 曾鸣,何深,杨玲玲. 碳排放交易市场排放权的拍卖方案设计[J]. 水电能源科学,2010,28(9):161-163.

[7] Mo Jianlei,Zhu Lei,Fan Ying. The impact of the EU ETS on the corporate value of the European electricity corporations[J]. Energy,2012,45(1):3-11.

[8] Hua Guowei,Cheng T C E,Wang Shouyang. Managing carbon footprints in inventory management[J].International Journal of Production Economics,2011,132(2):178-185.

[9] Dong Ciwei,Shen Bin,Chow P S. Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation[J]. Annals of Operations Research,2016,240(2):509-531.

[10] 谢鑫鹏,赵道致. 低碳供应链企业减排合作策略研究[J]. 管理科学,2013,26(3):108-119.

[11] Tang Ling,Wu Jiaqian,Yu Lean,et al. Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China:A multi-agent-based model[J]. Energy Policy,2015,81:152-169.

[12] Disney S M,Towill D R. The effect of vendor managed inventory(VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains[J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2003,85(2):199-215.

[13] Feng Yang. System dynamics modeling for supply chain information on sharing[J]. Physics Procedia,2012,25:1463-1469.

[14] 杨珺,李金宝,卢巍. 系统动力学的碳排放政策对供应链影响[J]. 工业工程与管理,2012,17(4):21-30.

[15] 汪小京,刘志学,徐娟. 基于系统动力学的第三方物流管理库存模型[J]. 系统管理学报,2016,25(2):317-325.

[16] 姜庆国. 电煤供应链碳排放全过程仿真研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2013.

[17] 张俊荣,王孜丹,汤铃,等. 基于系统动力学的京津冀碳排放交易政策影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(3):1-8.

[18] 于华. 煤炭供应链排放测算与控制研究[D]. 北京:北京交通大学,2011.

[19] 闵惜琳,陈原,张启人. 创新发展低碳经济系统思考[J]. 系统工程,2010,28(1):78-89.

[20] 项凌. 天然气节能减排经济性模拟与熵分析研究[D]. 天津:天津大学,2012.
Outlines

/