主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Research of Baltic Dirty Tanker Index Model Based on the Improved Mean Reversion

Expand
  • Collaborative Innovation Center for Transport Studies, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

Received date: 2016-10-24

  Revised date: 2017-06-13

  Online published: 2018-07-30

Abstract

In order to reduce the influence of freight fluctuation to the operation and decision-making of crude oil transportation and related enterprises. It is necessary to master the fluctuation law and changing characteristics of international crude oil freight. Effectively grasping the fluctuations and changing characteristics of freight has a vital significance for the operators to invest and manage the companies. In view of Baltic Dirty Tanker Index (BDTI) fluctuation mechanism, and after applying methods of unit root test and variance ratio test to verify the mean reversion characteristic of BDTI verification, this paper analyzes the mean reversion characteristic of BDTI to study its variation trend. Meanwhile, a time related model is established to forecast and analysis the BDTI which improves the traditional mean reversion model, and the corresponding method for parameters estimation is given. The improved model is verified through the numerical simulation both on the fitting effect and prediction accuracy. First, through the characteristics test, the mean regression equation with average level changes over time is established. Second, by using Korlgomov forward differential equation, a prediction model is set up on the base of improved mean reversion model to obtain the predictive value and confidence intervals, then predicted values are obtained through the fitting path of BDTI historical samples. Finally, through the analysis of BDTI published by Clarkson Database, result shows that on the one hand, the crude oil freight index has a significant mean return characteristic. And on the other hand, by forecasting and analyzing the crude oil freight index, the average relative error of this improved model is 0.1597 which is less than the traditional model's 0.1908, while the goodness of fit of improved model is 0.9420 which is a little higher than the tradition's 0.9396. The results show that the improved prediction model has better fitting effect than the traditional model, so it can better reflect the actual situation of the market. This means that the improvement of the mean regression model might be beneficial to the further study and application of the mean regression models. In the aspect of management and operation, the analysis and prediction of freight fluctuation and improvement of the mean regression model will be helpful for investment enterprises to make more excellent investment decision-making proposals.

Cite this article

FENG Wen-wen, KUANG Hai-bo, MENG Bin . Research of Baltic Dirty Tanker Index Model Based on the Improved Mean Reversion[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018 , 26(5) : 40 -50 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.05.005

References

[1] Koopmans T C. Tanker freight rates and tank ship building[M]. Holland:Netherlands Economic Institute, 1939.

[2] Adland R, Cullinane K. The non-linear dynamics of spot freight rates in tanker markets[J]. Transportation Research Part E:Logistics and Transportation Review, 2006, 42(3):211-224.

[3] Poblacion J. The stochastic seasonal behavior of freight rate dynamics[J]. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2015, 17(2):142-162.

[4] Abouarghoub W, Mariscal I, Howells P. Dynamic risk and volatility in tanker shipping markets:A Markov-switching application[C]//Proceedings of The International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) Conference Proceedings. Marseille, France, July 3-5, 2013.

[5] Batchelor R, Alizadeh A, Visvikis I. Forecasting Spot and Forward Prices in the International Freight Market[J]. International Journal of Forecasting, 2007, 23(1):107-114.

[6] Drobetz W, Richter T, Wambach M. Dynamics of time-varying volatility in the dry bulk and tanker freight markets[J]. Applied financial economics, 2012, 22(16):1367-1384.

[7] Sun Xiaolei, Tang Ling, Yang Yuying, et al. Identifying the dynamic relationship between tanker freight rates and oil prices:In the perspective of multiscale relevance[J]. Economic Modelling, 2014, 42:287-295.

[8] Zhu Chunying, Ren Xianling. Research on the relationship between the tanker freight and the future price of crude oil in the post financial crisis period[J]. Review of Industrial Economics, 2015, 2:005.

[9] Ji Mingjun, Zhang Haiyan, Wang Qingbin. Analysis and forecasting of the tanker freight rates based on combined forecasting model[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2012,2(1):199-204.

[10] Fan Shuangrui, Ji Tingyun, Gordon W, et al. Forecasting Baltic Dirty Tanker Index by applying wavelet neural networks[J]. 2013, 3(1):68-87.

[11] Eslami P, Jung K, Lee D, et al. Predicting tanker freight rates using parsimonious variables and a hybrid artificial neural network with an adaptive genetic algorithm[J]. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2017,19(3):538-550.

[12] Zhang Jiao, Zeng Qingcheng. Modelling the volatility of the tanker freight market based on improved empirical mode decomposition[J]. Applied Economics, 2017,49(17):1655-1667.

[13] Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment under uncertainty[M]. Princeton, N J:Princeton University Press, 1994.

[14] 王明亮, 何建敏, 陈百硕, 等. 时变O-U模型在气温预测及气温期货定价中的适应性研究——基于北京市1951-2012年的日平均气温数据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(2):44-49.

[15] 刘志东, 刘雯宇. Lévy过程驱动的非高斯OU随机波动模型及其贝叶斯参数统计推断方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(8):1-9.

[16] Kou Ying, Luo Meifeng. Modelling the relationship between ship price and freight rate with structural changes[J]. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (JTEP), 2015, 49(2):276-294.

[17] Taib C M I C. Forward pricing in the shipping freight market[J]. Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2016, 33(1):3-23.

[18] Kim J, Park J Y. Mean reversion and unit root properties of diffusion models[R]. Working paper, Indiana University, 2013.

[19] 张跃军, 魏一鸣. 国际碳期货价格的均值回归:基于EU ETS的实证分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2011, 31(2):214-220.

[20] Astorga P. Mean reversion in long-horizon real exchange rates:Evidence from Latin America[J]. Journal of International Money and Finance, 2012, 31(6):1529-1550.

[21] Nguyen D, Tie Jingzhi, Zhang Qing. An optimal trading rule under a switchable mean-reversion model[J]. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2014, 161(1):145-163.

[22] Benth F E, Koekebakker S. Stochastic modeling of Supramax spot and forward freight rates[J]. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 2016,18(4):391-413.

[23] Bibby B M, Sorensen M. Martingale estimation functions for discretely observed diffusion processes[J]. Bernoulli, 1995, 1(1/2):17-39.

[24] 宋玉臣, 寇俊生. 沪深股市均值回归的实证检验[J]. 金融研究, 2005,(12):55-61.

[25] Keles D, Genoese M, Möst D, et al. Comparison of extended mean-reversion and time series models for electricity spot price simulation considering negative prices[J]. Energy Economics, 2012, 34(4):1012-1032.

[26] Campbell J Y, Lo A W C, MacKinlay A C. The econometrics of financial markets[M]. Princeton, N J:Princeton University Press, 1997.
Outlines

/