There are interactive and adaptive evolution courses between the anti-terrorist measures of governments and the attack behaviors of terrorists. Moreover, for a terrorist event, governments and terrorists usually do not take the actions at the same time.
In the paper,Stackelberg game model is first built, where governments decide to defense strategies at the first and terrorists decide the attack strategies in the latter. And then, according to the above extensive-form factor game, the extensive-form evolutionary game model about the terrorism attack problem is built.
Because the equilibrium analysis of extensive-form evolutionary game model needs to consider the belief learning course at the inter-and intra-generation levels, it causes the complexity of evolutionary analysis. Although the conception of "Wright Manifold" that can be used to analyze the equilibrium solution of extensive-form evolutionary game model has been put forward, the method is difficult to understand and apply. However, if some conventional social norm are considered, the above analytical process can be simplified. Through introduceing the concept of "mental model" into evolutionary game theory, the new analytical method of evolutionary solution based mental model is proposed. For example, given terrorists take the attack strategy, the commonsensible behavior of any governmental forces should be the defense strategy. Thus, the utility functions of terrorists and governments are simplified. The replicator dynamic function of terrorists can be described as dyi/dt=yi·(1-yj)·(-f-c2)<0, where yi is the proportion of terrorists taking attack strategy, t is the evolutionary period, and f and c2 are the terrorists' payoffs. Similarly, the replicator dynamic function of governemnts can be described as dxi/dt=xi·(1-xi)·(yi·b-c1), where xi is the proportion of governments taking defense strategy, and b and c1 are the governments' payoffs. The evolutionary solution based mental model is that terrorists take the no-attack strategy, and whether governments take the defense strategy depends on the terrorists' proportion of taking the attack strategy. Lastly, based on the 6.28 terrorism incident in Moyu County, Xinjiang, the paper compares two evolutionary solutions of Wright Manifold and Mental Model.
By introducing the universal accepted social norm into evolutionary analysis, the analytical method based on mental model does not only simplify the course of existed "Wright Manifold" evolutionary analysis method proposed by Cressman (2000), but also demonstrate the more complex and realistic evolutionary characteristics. The new evolutionary solution of mental model has the high application worth. Under the overall trend of the effective control terrorist event, the anti-terrorist measurements of government force should flexibly adjust with the proportional change of terrorists taking the attack strategy. Thus, there is no best or consistent anti-terrorist strategy (evolutionary equilibrium).
LIU De-hai, CHAI Rui-rui, HAN Cheng-jun
. Extensive-form Evolutionary Game Analysis on Terrorism Based Mental Model[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018
, 26(2)
: 71
-78
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.02.008
[1] 曹颖苹, 梅建明. 对恐怖主义概念与成因的初步分析[J]. 公安大学学报, 2001, 92(4):54-58.
[2] Sandler T, Enders W. An economic perspective on transnational terrorism[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2004. 302(20):301-316.
[3] Jain S, Mukand S W. The economics of high-visibility terrorism[J]. European Journal of Political Economy, 2004, 20(2):479-494.
[4] Ressler S. Social network analysis as an approach to combat terrorism:Past, present, and future research[J]. Homeland Security Affairs, 2006, 2(2):1-10.
[5] Pinker E J. An analysis of short-term responses to threats of terrorism[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(6):865-880.
[6] Ghaffarzadegan N, Andersen D F. Modeling behavioral complexities of warning issuance for domestic security:A simulation approach to develop public management theories[J]. International Public Management Journal, 2012, 15(3):337-363.
[7] Zhuang Jun, Bier V M. Balancing terrorism and natural disasters-defensive strategy with endogenous attack effort[J]. Operations Research, 2007, 55(5):976-991.
[8] Wang Xiaofeng, Zhuang Jun. Balancing congestion and security in the presence of strategic applicants with private information[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 212(1):100-111.
[9] Zhuang Jun, Bier V M, Alagoz O. Modeling secrecy and deception in a multiple-period attacker-defender signaling game[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 203(2):409-418.
[10] 杨珺, 刘舒佶, 王玲. 考虑最坏中断损失下的P-中位设施选址问题的模型与算法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(4):120-129.
[11] 付举磊, 孙多勇, 肖进, 等. 基于社会网络分析理论的恐怖组织网络研究综述[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(9):2177-2186.
[12] 柴瑞瑞, 孙康, 陈静锋, 等. 连续恐怖袭击下反恐设施选址与资源调度优化模型及其应用[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(1):1-9.
[13] 刘德海, 周婷婷, 王维国. 反恐国际合作双重标准问题的序贯互惠博弈模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(S1):301-309.
[14] 刘德海,周婷婷. 基于认知差异的恐怖主义袭击误对策分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(10):2646-2656.
[15] 郑君君, 闫龙, 张好雨, 等. 基于演化博弈和优化理论的环境污染群体性事件处置机制[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(8):168-176.
[16] 易余胤, 盛昭瀚, 肖条军. 不同行为规则下的Cournot竞争的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2004, 12(3):126-130.
[17] Friedman D. On economic applications of evolutionary game theory[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1998, 8(1):15-43.
[18] Cressman R. Subgame monotonicity in extensive form evolutionary games[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2000, 32(2):183-205.
[19] 刘德海. 政府不同应急管理模式下群体性突发事件的演化分析[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(11):1968-1976.
[20] Maynard Smith J. Evolution and the theory of games[M]. Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press, 1982.
[21] Rouse W B, Morris N M. On looking into the black box:Prospects and limits in the search for mental models[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 1986, 100(3):349-363.
[22] Aoki M. Towards a comparative institutional analysis:motivations and some tentative theorizing[J]. Japanese Economic Review, 1996, 47(1):1-19.
[23] 邱永峥, 王盼盼. 新疆和田发生恐怖袭击事件[N]. 环球时报, 2013-6-29,(4).
[24] 马芳. 美专家指恐怖分子7月袭击伦敦地铁仅两千美元[EB/OL].[2006-01-04].http://sports.cctv.com/news/world/20060104/100478.shtml.
[25] 刘晓林, 李有军. 刑事诉讼法再次"大修"[N]. 人民日报海外版, 2011-08-25,(4).