主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Forecasting Realized volatility of Chinese Stock Index Futures based on Approved HAR Models with Median Realized Quarticity

Expand
  • School of Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Received date: 2016-11-26

  Revised date: 2017-07-11

  Online published: 2018-03-19

Abstract

Chinese stock index futures experienced an unusual bull and bear markets around 2015, but its volatility dynamic is a mystery for investors and regulators. Modeling and forecasting volatility is a feasible way to reveal volatility transmission process and track market risk. In this paper, 4 HAR-type models involving jumps, realized semivariances and signed jumps are established to forecast the realized volatility of CSI 300 index futures. Based on 4 basic HAR-type models, HARQ-type models and HARQF-type models are proposed by adding correction term of median realized quarticity (MedRQ). During the modeling process, two decompositions of realized volatility including continuous and jump variances, upside and downside realized semivariances are considered. To reduce the robustness of market microstructure noise, the optimal sampling frequency for calculating realized volatilities is determined by the minimum MSE criterion, the statistic Zmed of ADS jump test, realized semivariances and signed jump are revised based on realized kernel estimator. The newly MCS test is employed to evaluate the out-of-sample forecast performances. In-sample and out-of-sample analysis of forecast models are carried out on CSI 300 index futures, which shows important conclusions:1)Most of the predictable variation in realized volatility stems from continuous volatility rather than jump variance, and future realized volatility is more related to historical downside semivariances (bad volatility) than upside semivariances (good volatility); 2) Good volatility and bad volatility exhibit asymmetric impact effect that good (bad) volatility generate negative (positive) impact on future realized volatility; 3)Decomposition of upside and downside realized semivariances outperforms that of continuous and jump variances; 4) MedRQ can significantly enhance the forecast ability of HAR-type models, HARQF models outperform HARQ models on in-sample performances, while HARQ models achieve better out-of-sample forecast accuracy; 5) Signed jumps bear valuable information of both market volatility and directions, and HARQ-RV-SJ is the best model among all forecast models specified in our paper. Our findings have import implications for investors and policymakers to grasp the volatility and risk of Chinese stock index futures.

Cite this article

CHEN Sheng-Li, LI Yi-Jun, GUAN Tao . Forecasting Realized volatility of Chinese Stock Index Futures based on Approved HAR Models with Median Realized Quarticity[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018 , 26(1) : 57 -71 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.01.006

References

[1] Andersen T G, Bollerslev T, Diebold F X, et al. Exchange rate returns standardized by realized volatility are (nearly) Gaussian[J]. Multinational Finance Journal, 2000, 4(3/4):159-179.

[2] Andersen T G, Bollerslev T, Diebold F X, et al. The distribution of realized stock volatility[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, 61(1):43-76.

[3] Barndorff-Nielsen O E, Shephard N. Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2004, 2(1):1-37.

[4] Barndorff-Nielsen O E, Shephard N. Econometrics of testing for jumps in financial econometrics using bipower variation[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2006,4(1):1-30.

[5] Barndorff-Nielsen O E, Kinnebrock S, Shephard N. Measuring downside risk-realized semivariance[R]. Working Paper Oxford Financial Research Center,2008.

[6] Huang Xin, Tauchen G. The relative contribution of jumps to total price variance[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2005, 3(4):456-499.

[7] Andersen T G, Bollerslev T, Diebold F X. Roughing it up:Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility[J]. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2007, 89(4):701-720.

[8] Lee S S, Mykland P A. Jumps in financial markets:A new nonparametric test and jump dynamics[J]. Review of Financial studies, 2008, 21(6):2535-2563.

[9] Jiang G J, Oomen R C A. Testing for jumps when asset prices are observed with noise-A "swap variance" approach[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2008, 144(2):352-370.

[10] Aït-Sahalia Y, Jocad J, Testing for jumps in a discretely observed process[J]. The Annals of Statistic, 2009, 37(1):184-222.

[11] Podolskij M, Ziggel D. New tests for jumps in semimartingale models[J]. Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes, 2010, 13(1):15-41.

[12] Corsi F, Pirino D, Reno R. Threshold bipower variation and the impact of jumps on volatility forecasting[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2010, 159(2):276-288.

[13] Andersen T G, Dobrev D, Schaumburg E. Jump-robust volatility estimation using nearest neighbor truncation[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2012, 169(1):75-93.

[14] Benoit S, Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures using intraday data[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 235(3):643-659.

[15] Corsi F. A simple approximate long-memory model of realized volatility[J]. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2009, 7(2):174-196.

[16] Corsi F, Reno R, HAR volatility modelling with heterogeneous leverage and jumps[R]. Working Paper,Universita di Siena,2009.

[17] Corsi F, Pirino D, Reno R. Threshold bipower variation and the impact of jumps on volatility forecasting[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2010, 159(2):276-288.

[18] Patton A J, Sheppard K. Good volatility, bad volatility:Signed jumps and the persistence of volatility[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2013, 97(3):683-697.

[19] Audrino F, Hu Yujia. Volatility forecasting:Downside risk, jumps and leverage effect[J]. Econometrics, 2016,4(8):1-24.

[20] Vortelinos D I. Forecasting realized volatility:HAR against principal components combining neural networks and GARCH[J]. Research in International Business and Finance, 2017,39(part B):824-839.

[21] Bollerslev T, Patton A J, Quaedvlieg R. Exploiting the errors:A simple approach for improved volatility forecasting[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2016(1), 192(1):1-18.

[22] Hansen P R. A test for superior predictive ability[J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2005, 23(4):365-380.

[23] Hansen P R, Lunde A, Nason J M. The model confidence set[J]. Econometrica, 2011, 79(2):453-497.

[24] 魏宇. 沪深300股指期货的波动率预测模型研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2010,13(2):66-76.

[25] 马峰,魏宇,黄登仕,等. 基于跳跃和符号跳跃变差的HAR-RV预测模型及其MCS检验[J]. 系统管理学报,2015,24(5):700-710.

[26] 李洋,乔高秀. 沪深300股指期货市场连续波动与跳跃波动——基于已实现波动率的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2012,20(S1):451-457.

[27] Fang Nengsheng, Jiang Wen, Luo Ronghua. Realized semivariances and the variation of signed jumps in China's stock market[J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2015,53(3):563-586.

[28] Fang Nengsheng, Jiang Wen, Luo Ronghua. Asymmetric predictability of realized semivariances and the variations of signed jumps:Evidence from China's stock market[R]. Social Science Electronic Publishing,2015.

[29] Andersen T G, Bollerslev T, Frederiksen P,et al. Continuous-time models, realized volatilities, and testable distributional implications for daily stock returns[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2010, 25(2):233-261.

[30] Hansen P R, Lunde A. Realized variance and market microstructure noise[J]. Journal of Business and Statistics, 2006, 24(2):127-160.

[31] 闵素芹,柳会珍. 已实现波动率中最优抽样频率的选择[J]. 统计与决策,2009,(13):13-15.

[32] 李胜歌,张世英. 金融高频数据的最优抽样频率研究[J]. 管理学报,2008,5(6):801-806.

[33] Bandi F M, Russell J R. Separating microstructure noise from volatility[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 79(3):655-692.

[34] Bandi F M, Russell J R. Microstructure noise, realized volatility, and optimal sampling[J]. The Review of Economic Studies,2008,75(2):339-369.

[35] 翟慧,程思逸. 考虑成分股联跳与宏观信息发布的沪深300指数已实现波动率模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2016,24(12):10-19.

[36] 赵华. 中国股市的跳跃性与杠杆效应——基于已实现极差方差的研究[J]. 金融研究,2012,(11):179-192.

[37] 孙洁. 考虑跳跃和隔夜波动的中国股票市场波动率建模与预测[J]. 中国管理科学,2014,22(6):114-124.

[38] 陈国进,刘晓群,谢沛霖,等. 已实现跳跃波动与中国股市风险溢价研究[J]. 管理科学学报,2016,19(6):98-113.
Outlines

/