主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Competitive Investment Strategy for Renewable Power Generation Under Uncertainty

Expand
  • 1. Center for Energy and Environment Policy Research, Institute of Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    2. Tianjin Normal University, School of Management, Tianjin 300387, China;
    3. Beihang University, School of economics and management, Beijing 100190, China

Received date: 2016-10-08

  Revised date: 2017-02-15

  Online published: 2017-09-25

Abstract

In this paper, complete preemption game model based on the real option theory is provided to analyze the optimal investment timing for investors when they compete with counterparts for the renewable energy projects under the feed in tariff policies. A geometric Brownian motion is adopted to characterize the dynamic variation of electricity spot pricing. Also, the influence of incomplete information related to rivals' investment timings on the decisions is stuaied. Theoretically, it is proved that the investment timing is within the range with upper bound of the timing for a monopolist and lower bound of the timing decided by zero-net present value. Numerical results reveal that the more FIT level and the earlier investment timing. The proposed model is able to help investors to determine the optimal timing of the feed in tariff policies when they participate in investigating, and the policy makers can draft a reasonable FIT level according to the feedback of the investors.

Cite this article

LI Li, ZHU Lei, FAN Ying . Competitive Investment Strategy for Renewable Power Generation Under Uncertainty[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017 , 25(7) : 11 -17 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.07.002

References

[1] Seneviratne S I, Nicholls N, Easterling D,et al. Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation: Changes in climate extremes and their impacts on the natural physical environment [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

[2] Gross R, Blyth W, Heptonstall P. Risks, revenues and investment in electricity generation: Why policy needs to look beyond costs [J]. Energy Economics, 2010, 32(4): 796-804.

[3] Couture T, Gagnon Y. An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment [J]. Energy policy, 2010, 38(2): 955-965.

[4] 李庆, 陈敏. 中国风电固定上网电价政策的实物期权理论与实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 65-73.

[5] Sawin J L, Martinot E, Barnes D, et al. Renewables 2016-Global status report [R].Working Paper,Renewable Energy Ploicy Network for the 21st Century, 2016.

[6] Myers S C. Determinants of corporate borrowing [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1977, 5(2): 147-175.

[7] Ritzenhofen I, Birge J R, Spinler S. The structural impact of renewable portfolio standards and feed-in tariffs on electricity markets[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 255(1): 224-242.

[8] Azevedo A, Paxson D. Developing real option game models [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 237(3): 909-920.

[9] Lambrecht B, Perraudin W. Real options and preemption under incomplete information [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2003, 27(4): 619-643.

[10] Weeds H. Strategic delay in a real options model of R&D competition [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2002, 69(3): 729-747.

[11] Graham J R, Hanlon M, Shevlin T. Real effects of accounting rules: Evidence from multinational firms' investment location and profit repatriation decisions [J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 2011, 49(1): 137-185.

[12] 朱磊, 范英, 张晓兵. 基于期权博弈的中国风电投资分析[J]. 数理统计与管理, 2010, 29(2):328-335.

[13] Alizamir S, Véricourt F D, Sun Peng. Efficient Feed-In-Tariff Policies for Renewable Energy Technologies [J]. Operations Research, 2016, 64(1): 52-66.

[14] Ritzenhofen I, Spinler S. Optimal design of feed-in-tariffs to stimulate renewable energy investments under regulatory uncertainty — A real options analysis [J]. Energy Economics, 2016, 53: 76-89.

[15] Boomsma T K, Meade N, Fleten S E. Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: A real options approach [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2012, 220(1): 225-237.

[16] International Energy Agency. World energy outlook 2015[EB/OL]. http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2015/WEO2015_ToC.pdf.

[17] International Renewable Energy Agency. Adapting renewable energy policies to dynamic market conditions[EB/OL].http://www.ourenergypolicy.org/adapting-renewable-energy-policies-to-dynamic-market-conditions/.

[18] Bobtcheff C, Villeneuve S. Technology choice under several uncertainty sources [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 206(3): 586-600.

[19] Siddiqui A, Fleten S E. How to proceed with competing alternative energy technologies: A real options analysis [J]. Energy Economics, 2010, 32(4): 817-830.

[20] Kucsera D, Rammerstorfer M. Regulation and grid expansion investment with increased penetration of renewable generation [J]. Resource and Energy Economics, 2014, 37: 184-200.

[21] Harrison J M, Kreps D M. Martingales and arbitrage in multipored securities markets [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1979, 20(3): 381-408.

[22] International Renewable Energy Agency. Data quality for the Global Renewable Energy Atlas-Solar and Wind[EB/OL]. http://www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/Global%20Atlas_Data%20_Quality.pdf.
Outlines

/