The supervision behavior of government regulation is the inner source of project quality government supervision effectiveness, The essential characteristics of project quality government supervision running are double principal-agent mechanism. Multiple principal-agent research at home and abroad are limited to the same object, abstract subject behavior between strategy and balanced process, government supervision over the quality engineering has two layers of principal-agent differences and the second level agents, the complex organizational structure of the monitoring group, to explore its agent chain multi-level incentive mechanism will be conducive to double principal-agent theory.Based on the construction main body structure and the economic contract, Analysis the principal-agent relations and characteristics of construction project quality government supervision, building and simplifying the project quality government supervision agency chain; construct the principal-agent mechanism model of project quality government supervision with Holmstrom and Milgrom parameterization method, based on the analysis of agent chain structure to simplify the incentive mechanism model, through the game model to get the incentive parameters of project supervision. Results show that: Incentive coefficient β is r、σ2 and b decreasing function, Project quality forming process of the larger the variance, the agent is more afraid of hard work, the corresponding risk is smaller. Quality supervision team effort aik=β/bΛik2 is proportional to the β, and is inversely proportional to the cost coefficient and engineering contracts, enhance the quality of supervision and professional level is helpful to reduce its quality supervision cost coefficient; set up quality grading evaluation mechanism is the precondition of incentive mechanism; quality supervision cost will affect its quality supervision effort level (aik=β/bΛik2), quality supervision is inversely proportional to the cost and the ability of supervisors; if the government supervision department keep expense proportion is 1-ρ, adjusting incentive mechanism coefficients is ρδ and ργ, the government objective function can achieve the optimal. When take no account of the project contracts, it can simplified to unit principal-agent model, β=1/1+rbσ2. In addition to the incentive mechanism, the work together of the punishment implementation mechanism, reputation mechanism, insurance mechanism and the rating system make for ensure the steady rise of engineering quality. Project quality government supervision agency chain and multi-level incentive mechanism research will be for engineering quality and government supervision coordination incentive measures and operation mechanism optimization to provide theoretical support and serve as a reference for other public goods regulatory incentive theory.
GUO Han-ding, HAO Hai, ZHANG Yin-xian
. Analysis on Agency Chain and Research on Multi-level Incentive Mechanism of Project Quality Government Supervision[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017
, 25(6)
: 82
-90
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.06.009
[1] 郭汉丁,张印贤,张宇,等.工程质量政府监督多层次激励协同机理研究综述[J].建筑经济,2013,(2):100-103.
[2] Simona P. Multi-level governance: Underplayed features, overblown expectation and missing linkages[M] //Ongaro E.Multi-level governance:The missing linkages.Bingley,West Yorkshine:Emerald Group Publishing Limited,2015,(6):321-342.
[3] 任曙明,孙飞,王洪静.双重委托代理、股东优势与管理层激励契约——对食品类上市公司的实证研究[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2014,35(2):44-49.
[4] Ernst F, Schmidt K M. Fairness and incentives in a multi-task principal-agent model[J]. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics,2004,106(3):453-474.
[5] Boctom W P,Holloway J,Miller G J, et al. Building a pathway to cooperation:Negotiation and social exchange between principal and agent[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2006,51(1):29-58.
[6] 李春红,王苑萍,郑志丹.双重委托代理对上市公司过度投资的影响路径分析——基于异质性双边随机边界模型[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(11):131-139.
[7] 罗艳梅,程新生.双重委托代理关系下的内部审计实验研究——角色冲突、权力配置与内部审计行为[J].管理评论,2014,26(11):201-208.
[8] Caroline N, Fredrik N, Birger R. Accountability in local government: A principal-agent perspective[J].Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting,2005,9(2):123-137.
[9] 陈其安,刘艾萍,李红强.存在主次委托人条件下的委托-代理问题:理论模型和实验研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(4):139-147.
[10] 孟凡生,周瑜.基于双重成本控制标准作用的委托-代理模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(6):1440-1448.
[11] Matthew N. Principal agent relations and the decline of the royal african company[J]. Chartering Capitalism: Organizing Markets, States, and Publics,2015,11(6):45-76.
[12] 陈永鸿,罗汉宾,王广斌.集成化建设模式下的工程项目委托代理契约设计[J].土木工程与管理学报,2014,31(2):68-72.
[13] 曾顺秋,骆建文.基于数量折扣的供应链交易信用激励机制[J].系统管理学报,2015,24(1):85-90.
[14] 严玲,邓新位,邓娇娇.基于关键项目治理因子的代建人激励实证研究:以项目控制权为调节变量[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(6):126-137.
[15] Ning N. A principal-agent model for incentive design in knowledge sharing[J]. Journal of Knowledge Management,2008,12(3):101-113.
[16] Steven S. Risk sharing and incentives in the principal and agent relationship[J].The Bell Journal of Economics,1979,10(1):55-73.
[17] Daniel R, Didier A, Thibaud M, etal. Multi-agent architecture for supply chain management[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,2004,15(8):745-755.
[18] 王立平,丁辉.基于委托代理关系的低碳技术创新激励机制研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,(1):73-80.
[19] 李春红,王苑萍,郑志丹. 双重委托代理对上市公司过度投资的影响路径分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2014,22(11):131-139.
[20] Sekar R, Priyali R, Timothy J G. Marketing healthful eating to children:The effectiveness of incentives, pledges, and competitions[J].Journal of Marketing,2010,74(5):93-106.
[21] 王玉洁,苏振民,佘小颉. IPD模式下项目团队激励机制设计与分析[J]. 工程管理学报,2013,27(4):072-076.
[22] 胡文发,朱言,何新华.工程项目承包商多层次利益分配与激励机制[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(9):1437-1443.
[23] 王常伟,顾海英.基于委托代理理论的商品安全激励机制分析[J].软科学,2013,27(8):65-68,74.