主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
Articles

Portfolio Optimization of Multi-period Loan in Supply Chain Finance via Copula-Quantile Regression Method

Expand
  • 1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230009, China

Received date: 2016-01-26

  Revised date: 2016-03-28

  Online published: 2017-08-26

Abstract

With the continuous development and expansion of supply chain finance business, it is necessary for policymakers to reduce the concentration risk cased by sharp fluctuations of price of single pledge and keep the flexibility of the supply chain finance business. To this end, portfolio methods has been successfully applied by financial institutions for selecting different pledges to optimize the multi-period loan portfolio in supply chain finance. As we all known, Copula technique is flexible to capture the nonlinear dependence structures among assets, which is very important for portfolio in practice. In this paper, a Copula-quantile regression method is proposed by employing quantile regression to fit marginal distribution of a single asset and Copula function to capture nonlinear dependence structures among assets. Our method is able to avoid the model specification errors without assumption of the distribution of random disturbance term. Most importantly, it is flexible and adapted to describe stylized facts in supply chain finance, such as asymmetry and nonlinearity. The Copula-quantile regression method for optimizing the multi-period loan portfolio in supply chain finance consists of two steps. The Copula-quantile regression method is firstly applied to predict the multi-period loan return. Then, a decision-making scheme is provided for the loan portfolio by minimizing the traditional Sharpe ratio and the generalized Omega ratio. To illustrate the efficacy of our method, an empirical research is conducted on the spot of aluminum and copper which are the most common form of the pledge in supply chain finance. At least two facts can be drawn from the empirical results. First, the t-Copula function in Copula-quantile regression method is always optimal for all periods in term of AICs, which indicates that the correlation between aluminum and copper is a fat tail version. Second, the Copula-quantile regression method outperforms the Copula-GARCH in that the former poses higher Sharpe ratio and generalized Omega ratio than the latter for all portfolios at different periods, and provides a more reliable decision-making reference for the healthy development of supply chain finance. In the future, considering more assets in a portfolio has practical significance for policymakers. To address this issue, our method can be extended to vine-Copula-quantile regression through combining vine-Copula approach with quantile regression model. It can be expected that vine-Copula-quantile regression method can effectively handle the problem of selecting more pledges to construct multi-period loan portfolio in supply chain finance. This is left for future research.

Cite this article

XU Qi-fa, LI Hui-yan, JIANG Cui-xia . Portfolio Optimization of Multi-period Loan in Supply Chain Finance via Copula-Quantile Regression Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017 , 25(6) : 50 -60 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.06.006

References

[1] Markowitz H. Portfolio selection[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1): 77-91.

[2] Embrechts P A, McNeil A, Straumann D. Correlation:Pitfalls and alternatives[J]. Risk, 1999, 12(5): 11-21.

[3] 周艳菊, 王亚滨, 王宗润. 基于Copula函数的股指尾部相关性研究——以道琼斯工业指数与恒生指数为例[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(9): 19-27.

[4] Boubaker H, Sghaier N. Portfolio optimization in the presence of dependent financial returns with long memory: A copula based approach[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2013, 37(2): 361-377.

[5] 何娟, 王建, 蒋祥林. 存货质押业务质物组合价格风险决策[J]. 管理评论, 2013, 25(11): 163-176.

[6] 谭雪. 基于Copula模型的外汇投资组合风险度量[J]. 统计与决策, 2014, (14): 152-155.

[7] 李鹏举, 朱辉. 基于Copula函数的金融理财产品风险度量[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(3): 663-667.

[8] 刘祥东, 范彬, 杨易铭, 等. 基于M-Copula-SV-t模型的高维组合风险度量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 1-9.

[9] 胡根华. 人民币与国外主要货币的尾部相依和联动[J]. 统计研究, 2015, 32(5): 40-46.

[10] 张晨, 杨玉, 张涛. 基于Copula模型的商业银行碳金融市场风险整合度量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(4): 61-69.

[11] 于文华, 魏宇, 康明惠. 不同时变Copula-EVT-ES模型精度比较研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2015, 18(5): 32-45.

[12] 苟红军, 陈迅, 花拥军. 基于GARCH-EVT-COPULA模型的外汇投资组合风险度量研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2015, 29(1): 183-193.

[13] 何娟, 王建, 蒋祥林,等. 基于Copula-CVaR-EVT方法的供应链金融质物组合优化[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2015, 35(1): 1-16.

[14] Zhu Min. Return distribution predictability and its implications for portfolio selection[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2013, 27(27): 209-223.

[15] Koenker R W, Bassett G. Regression quantile[J]. Econometrica, 1978, 46(1): 33-50.

[16] 许启发, 周莹莹, 蒋翠侠. 带有范数约束的CVaR高维组合投资决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 40-49.

[17] Sharpe W F. Mutual fund performance[J]. Journal of Business, 1966, 39(1): 119-138.

[18] Keating C, Shadwick W F. A universal performance measure[J]. Journal of Performance Measurement, 2002, 6(3): 59-84.

[19] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979,47(2): 263-292.

[20] Bollerslev T. Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity[J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1986, 31(3): 307-327.

[21] Han Y. Asset allocation with a high dimensional latent factor stochastic volatility model[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2006, 19(1): 237-271.

[22] 蒋翠侠, 刘玉叶, 许启发. 基于LASSO分位数回归的对冲基金投资策略研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(3): 107-126.
Outlines

/