In the knowledge network of industrial cluster, the exploratory knowledge and exploitative knowledge will be sent from the knowledge supply source, through the knowledge intermediary to the users, and then form the feedback information to the knowledge source. In this paper, the knowledge closed-loop system based on the network power is studied, the differences about knowledge pricing and profits in different decision models are compared. The method of game theory and numerical simulation is used, the different decision-making behaviors under the different power networks of knowledge entity are compared. The result shows that (1) in each model, knowledge profits decreases with the increase of the preference coefficient,(2) in the decentralized decision mode, the income of knowledge source and the intermediary is related to the power, the more power, the greater the corresponding profits, and(3) the centralized decision model is the optimal decision mode, it can make the price lowest in both of exploratory knowledge and exploitative knowledge, and the system can reach the highest profits. However, this model can only be achieved through coordination mechanism. Thus the effective coordination mechanism is designed to achieve the centralized decision model and to provide beneficial enlightenment to the industrial cluster knowledge management practice. The conclusions would be helpful to enrich the knowledge closed-loop theory and popularize the application of cluster knowledge closed-loop system in reality.
HAN Ying, CHEN Guo-hong, LIANG Juan
. Knowledge Pricing, Profits and Coordination Research on Knowledge Closed-loop System of Industrial Cluster Ambidextrous Innovation Based on Network Power[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017
, 25(3)
: 68
-75
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.03.008
[1] 韩莹,陈国宏.多重网络嵌入与产业集群知识共享关系研究[J].科学学研究, 2016,34(10):1498-1506.
[2] 刘丽丽,杜荣,艾时钟.IT服务企业中文化对知识共享与创新行为关系的影响[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(4):159-166.
[3] 赵国强,徐晓辉,蒲勇健.授权决策的期权特征与模型解析[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(8):54-62.
[4] Maloni M, Benton W C. Power influence in the supply chain[J].Journal of Business Logistics, 2000,21(1):49-65.
[5] Charles D, Arvind P. Orchestrating innovation network[J].Academy of Management Review,2006,31(3):659-669.
[6] Rajan R G, Zingales L. Power in a theory of the firm[R]. Working Paper, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1997.
[7] Pérez-Nordtvedt L, Kedia B L, Datta D K, et al. Effectiveness and efficiency of cross-border knowledge transfer:An empirical examination[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2008, 45(4):714-744.
[8] March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1):71-87.
[9] Danneels E. The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(12):1095-1121.
[10] Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation, exploration, and process management:The productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2):238-256.
[11] Osiyevskyy O, Dewald J. Explorative versus exploitative business model change:The cognitive antecedents of firm-level responses to disruptive innovation[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2015, 9(1):58-78.
[12] Ganzaroli A, De Noni I, Orsi L, et al. The combined effect of technological relatedness and knowledge utilization on explorative and exploitative invention performance post-M & A[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2016, 19(2):167-188.
[13] Lin H E, McDonough E F, Lin S J, et al. Managing the exploitation/exploration paradox:The role of a learning capability and innovation ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(2):262-278.
[14] O'Reilly C A, Tushman M L. Organizational ambidexterity:Past, present, and future[J]. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 2013, 27(4):324-338.
[15] Sariol A M, Abebe M A. The influence of CEO power on explorative and exploitative organizational innovation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 73:38-45.
[16] 周钟,陈智高.产业集群网络中知识转移行为仿真分析——企业知识刚性视角[J].管理科学学报,2015,18(1):41-49.
[17] 张向先,李昆,郭顺利,等.知识生态视角下企业员工隐性知识转移过程及影响因素研究[J].情报科学,2016,34(10):134-140.
[18] 杜维,刘清华.合作联盟间失败知识定价模型研究[J].情报杂志, 2015,34(11):94-99.
[19] 张华.协同创新,知识溢出的演化博弈机制研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(2):92-99.
[20] 张军,许庆瑞,张素平.知识积累、知识激活与创新能力关系研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,22(10):142-148.
[21] Zhao Hao. Raising awareness and signaling quality to uniformed consumers:A price-advertising model[J].Marking Science,2000,19(4):390-396.
[22] 王玉燕,申亮.基于消费者需求差异和渠道权力结构差异的MT-CLSC定价, 效率与协调研究[J].中国管理科学,2014,6(22):34-41.