A large number of enterprises enter industrial cluster by the way of cluster transfer, and realize the common growth between themselves and local companies through the netting cooperation with local companies. The speciality of netting strategy will effect the cluster network structure and knowledge level. The strategy of entering into networks of transfer enterprise is definited based on environmental uncertainty, and the dynamic simulation model of cooperative innovation of transfer enterprise and local enterprise is constructed by multi-agent simulation methods. Then three network structures are compared by following three kinds of networks which take shape after cooperative innovation by transfer enterprise and local enterprise. On this basis, the level of knowledge of cluster under three kinds of environments is compared, and the mechanism of the simulation results is explored. The results show that:under the condition of environmental difference the network structure and knowledge level of clusters present a different changing rule. Risk cluster has the feather of high connectivity and high knowledge level. Partial transfer of business in Shackle cluster are failure to cooperate with local enterprise. And the knowledge width of Shackle cluster has many zero growth. The risk environment is more suitable for transfer enterprise to local embedded in the long run. Risk environment is more suitable for the cluster environment of transfer of enterprise of the local embedding netting, and it accelerates the transfer of promoting enterprise to enhance the cluster knowledge level of the cluster. The research perspective of transfer enterprise netting strategy is expanded into the environmental uncertainty. In a certain sense,it reveals the influence of transfer enterprise netting strategy on the cluster innovation network structure and knowledge level under the condition of environmental difference, and provides certain reference basis for the administrator to develop system and improve the cluster environment.
MA Yong-hong, ZHANG Fan
. Strategy of Entering into Networks of Transfer Enterprise, Network Structure and Level of Knowledge[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017
, 25(2)
: 187
-196
.
DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.02.021
[1] 黄玮强, 庄新田, 姚爽. 基于动态知识互补的企业集群创新网络演化研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2011, 29(10):1557-1567.
[2] 蔡猷花,陈国宏,刘虹,等. 产业集群创新网络与知识整合交互影响模型及仿真分析[J]. 中国管理科学,2013,21(S2):771-776.
[3] CristinaI, CristinaA, Narvaiza L. How to foster shared innovation within SMEs' networks:Social capital and the role of intermediaries[J]. European Management Journal, 2015, 33(2):104-115.
[4] 王国红,刘隽文,邢蕊. 竞合视角下中小企业协同创新行为的演化博弈模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2015,(S1):662-666.
[5] 赵健宇, 袭希, 苏屹. 知识流动网络演化中小世界效应的仿真研究[J]. 管理评论, 2013, 27(5):70-81.
[6] 曹霞, 张路蓬. 基于利益分配的创新网络合作密度演化研究[J]. 系统工程学报, 2016,(1):1-12.
[7] Kim S T. Regional advantage of cluster development:A case study of the San Diego biotechnology cluster[J]. European Planning Studies, 2015, 23(2):238-261.
[8] Faria J R. Location clusters, FDI and local entrepreneurs:Consistent public policy[J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2016,7(4):858-868.
[9] 张倩,竺杏月,张华. FDI对我国服务贸易竞争力传导机制的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2015,S1:490-495.
[10] 黄凌云, 杨娜. 外资兼并对企业出口和技术进步的影响:基于倾向指数再加权估计法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(12):34-40.
[11] 田钢, 张永安. 集群创新网络演化的动力模型及其仿真研究[J]. 科研管理, 2010,31(1):104-115.
[12] 赵健宇, 袭希, 苏屹. 知识流动网络演化中小世界效应的仿真研究[J]. 管理评论, 2013, 27(5):70-81.
[13] 黄晓, 胡汉辉, 于斌斌. 产业集群式转移中新集群网络的建构与演化——理论与实证[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(4):539-548.
[14] Eisingerich A B, Bell S J, Tracey P. How can clusters sustain performance? The role of network strength, network openness, and environmental uncertainty[J]. Research Policy, 2010, 39(2):239-253.
[15] Duncan R B. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1972,17(3):313-327.
[16] 孙冰,姚洪涛. 环境不确定性视角下创新网络阶段性演化研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2014, 35(12):71-79.
[17] Cowan R, Jonard N, Özman M. Knowledge dynamics in a network industry[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2004, 71(5):469-484.
[18] Cowan R, Jonard N. Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2004, 28(8):1557-1575.
[19] 花磊,王文平. 不同创新类型下的有效创新网络结构[J]. 管理工程学报, 2014,28(3):110-119+90.
[20] Cowan R, Jonard N, Zimmermann J B. Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(7):1051-1067.
[21] 林秋月,王文平,王娇俐.产业集群创新网络结构特征的仿真分析——基于March利用式-探索式创新分析框架[J]. 管理学报, 2010, 7(7):1015-1020.
